answersLogoWhite

0

Scientists did not know how traits were inherited.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Biology

Why was Robert Hooke event was an important foundation for the work of Watson and crick?

Robert Hooke's discovery of cells and his studies on microscopy laid the foundation for our understanding of the physical structure of cells. This knowledge was essential for Watson and Crick in their discovery of the double helix structure of DNA, as it provided a framework for understanding the molecular basis of genetics. Hooke's work highlighted the importance of observation and detailed study in scientific discovery, which influenced the approaches taken by later scientists like Watson and Crick.


What term defines question about what people do with the knowledge in biology that cannot be answered using scientific method?

The question is very confusing; please re-think the question and edit it. For example, "knowledge in Biology" either came from the scientific method, or it can at least be addressed using the scientific method. If not, then you are not talking about "knowledge in biology".


What is scientific evolution?

Scientific evolution is the evolution of scientific methodology through time; from the first attempts to derive knowledge about the world through observation, to the first formal approaches to do so structurally, including experimentation, to the current system of research and publication, which includes a formal scientific ethos.


What is one way in which a discovery that is made by using cell technology could change existing scientific knowledge?

The discovery of CRISPR gene editing technology has revolutionized the field of genetics by providing a precise method for modifying DNA sequences. This technology has enabled scientists to study gene function in a more targeted and efficient manner, leading to a deeper understanding of genetic diseases, cellular processes, and potential therapeutic interventions.


Should scientific knowledge and personal beliefs play equal or unequal roles in decisions about biotechnology?

Scientific knowledge should play a primary role in decisions about biotechnology, as it provides evidence-based information on potential risks and benefits. Personal beliefs can be considered, but decisions should prioritize scientific evidence to ensure safety and efficacy in biotechnological applications.

Related Questions

Frederick Griffith made a scientific discovery in 1928. Which best describes the knowledge about genetics before 1928?

Scientists did not know how traits were inherited.


Was there an increase in scientific knowledge for Amerigo Vespucci's discovery?

Which discovery? Amerigo rediscovered America, but that wasn't scientific.


What part of speech is scientific knowledge?

"Scientific knowledge" is a noun phrase. In this phrase, "scientific" functions as an adjective that describes the noun "knowledge," specifying the type of knowledge being referred to.


What best describes where the scientist who have contributed to our scientific knowledge were located?

Their place of work


What describes something that is created from scientific data to benefit society?

The useful application of scientific knowledge is called technology.


Which best describes where the scientist who have contributed to our scientific knowledge were located?

they were from all parts of the world


Which best describes when our scientific body of knowledge was?

t was developed by scientists throughout history


Which best describes where the scientists who have contributed to your scientific knowledge were located?

They were from all parts of the world


What are the contributions of Fredrick Taylor to the management theory?

Frederick Taylor was the father of scientific management theory. His contributions include the application of engineering and scientific knowledge in management.


Does science have a set of rules to follow?

Sort of; there is a scientific method which describes how to investigate a phenomenon to extract knowledge.


What are the best books on the philosophy of science?

Some of the best books on the philosophy of science include "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions" by Thomas Kuhn, "Science and Hypothesis" by Henri Poincar, and "The Logic of Scientific Discovery" by Karl Popper. These books explore the nature of scientific knowledge, the process of scientific discovery, and the criteria for evaluating scientific theories.


What changes has scientific discovery made on human interest in religion?

I have the general impression that the increase in scientific knowledge has had a tendency to reduce interest in religion, or even belief in God.