They are alike because, they don't have true roots, steams, and leaf-like structures.
They are different because some grow in water, and some grow on land like most plants do.
They are alike because, they don't have true roots, steams, and leaf-like structures.
They are different because some grow in water, and some grow on land like most plants do.
THEY BOTH PRODUCE THEIR OWN FOOD.
Both types have alternation of generation to complete their sexual reproductive cycle and both can perform photosynthesis.
ummmm
Conifer is a vascular plant.
no. nonvascular plants are thing such are liverworts, hornworts, and mosses.
vascular plants are plants that have vessels
Yes. Very few plants are nonvascular, but a dogwood is definitely vascular.
Mosses and liverworts are non-vascular. Horsetails are vascular plants.
They are alike by having to do with transporting nutrients to plants.
these people are wrong its vascular
Pitcher plants are vascular plants.
Brassicas are vascular.
i think they are vascular??
Vascular plants have vascular tissue while non-vascular plants don´t
I really do not know, so stop buggin me!!!!
ricca and marchantia are two plants without tubes they are also non-vascular
Vascular plants have vascular tissue while non-vascular plants don´t
anyone know!? the choices are nonvascular plants...seedles vascular plants.....vascular seed plants without flowers....vascular seed plants with flowers.
Nonvascular plants dont have xylem and phloem, whereas seed plants have vascular bundles
Vascular plants have a specialized vascular system made up of xylem and phloem, which allows them to transport water, nutrients, and sugars. Nonvascular plants, on the other hand, lack this specialized system and instead absorb water and nutrients directly into their tissues. Additionally, vascular plants have true roots, stems, and leaves, while nonvascular plants do not.