The idea of evolution is that evolution is a fact and the theory of evolution by natural selection explains much about the fact of evolution.
Your question is ill posed. A more modern phrase would say your question is malformed.
How could the fact of evolution be a threat to anything? How could the theory that is the backbone of Biology not be one of the greatest progressions in science?
Much confusion between fact and theory. Theory explains fact and encompasses fact and is a higher scientific concept than fact.
The scientific community doesn't accept something until it has been conclusively supported by evidence and has been shown to fit the facts. The religious community saw it as a threat to their belief system (and some still do today).
Charles Darwin's theory of evolution upset people because it challenged traditional religious beliefs about the origin of life and the role of humans in the natural world. It also posed a threat to established scientific theories of the time. Additionally, the idea that humans shared a common ancestor with other species was seen as controversial and unsettling to many people.
Because it is an internally consistent explanation of a mechanism of evolution that is supported by many lines of converging evidence, that has been repeatedly tested and is capable of making testable predictions. Pretty much the scientific definition of theory.
Evolution is best categorized as a scientific theory that explains how species change over time through a process of natural selection, genetic variation, and adaptation. It provides a framework for understanding the diversity of life on Earth and how species have evolved to their current forms.
Numerous scientific disciplines, such as genetics, paleontology, and comparative anatomy, provide evidence supporting Darwin's theory of evolution. Fossil records show transitional forms between species, genetic studies demonstrate shared ancestry through common DNA sequences, and observations of natural selection in action support the idea of species evolving over time. These various lines of evidence collectively contribute to the scientific consensus on the validity of Darwin's theory of evolution.
he proposed a theory about natural selection
The idea that evolution is mathematically impossible is a misconception. Evolution is a well-supported scientific theory that explains the diversity of life on Earth through gradual changes in populations over generations via mechanisms like natural selection and genetic drift. Mathematical models and evidence from various scientific fields support the concept of evolution.
Charles Darwin came up with the Idea of Evolution by means of Natural Selection, this eventually became a scientific theory.
The scientific community doesn't accept something until it has been conclusively supported by evidence and has been shown to fit the facts. The religious community saw it as a threat to their belief system (and some still do today).
Charles Darwin's theory of evolution upset people because it challenged traditional religious beliefs about the origin of life and the role of humans in the natural world. It also posed a threat to established scientific theories of the time. Additionally, the idea that humans shared a common ancestor with other species was seen as controversial and unsettling to many people.
Charles Darwin's idea of evolution was initially ignored because it challenged the prevailing religious beliefs about the origin of life, and because there was insufficient scientific evidence at the time to support his theory. His ideas went against the widely accepted belief in creationism, causing controversy and skepticism among the scientific community and the general public.
A scientific law is an indisputable fact: there are no observances dictating it. For example, gravity is a scientific law. A scientific theory is simply a generally accepted explanation for a particular phenomenon or idea that cannot currently be proven or disproven. The structure of the atom and evolution are theories.
It would probably be superseded by a thesis founded on more credible scientific evidence.
"Evolutionism" is a condescending term used by creationists or intelligent design supporters to suggest that evolution is only a belief system, or that it is somehow not scientific. The correct term is "evolutionary science" or simply "evolution".
One example of a pseudoscientific idea is astrology, which claims that the positions of celestial bodies influence human behavior and personality, lacking empirical support and scientific validation. In contrast, a scientific idea is the theory of evolution, which is supported by extensive evidence from genetics, fossil records, and observations of natural selection, explaining the diversity of life on Earth through a well-established framework.
Because it is an internally consistent explanation of a mechanism of evolution that is supported by many lines of converging evidence, that has been repeatedly tested and is capable of making testable predictions. Pretty much the scientific definition of theory.
Theistic evolution is the idea that God intervenes to guide the course of evolution. Naturalistic evolution makes no mention of God. Naturalistic evolution is the idea that evolution is a normal result of natural processeses. Naturalistic evolution is compatible with both atheism, and compatible with the idea of a God that can set in motion self-sufficient processes that work without any need for ongoing intervention.