No, because it didn't posses any of the characteristics of a living thing like- having cells, having internal environment, having the capacity to grow and develop, having the ability to reproduce, respond to stimuli, adaptation to the environment, etc.........
A printer is a nonliving thing because it does not possess biological processes such as growth, reproduction, or metabolism. It is a man-made device designed to perform specific functions based on input commands.
In biological terms, a clone is a living thing. For example, Dolly the sheep was a clone, and clearly she was a living thing.
living
its nonliving because fossils are like bones and things from the past
non living
The safe distance between a photocopying machine and a personal workstation is at least one meter. The distance help in operating the photocopying machine.
1900
A computerised photocopying machine
The first photocopying machine was invented in 1938 by Chester Carlson. It was called the "Xerox machine" and used a process called xerography to create copies of documents.
A photocopying machine is used to make copies of documents quickly and efficiently. It helps in reproducing important paperwork, reports, and materials without the need to manually rewrite them.
By definition, a robot is a machine and therefore not a living entity.
No, a car is not considered a living thing. Living things exhibit characteristics such as growth, reproduction, and response to stimuli, which a car does not possess.
A printer is non-living. It is a machine made from plastic and metal parts.
Photocopying in 3D
The difference between you and the bicycle you ride on is that you are a living thing that breathes while the bicycle is a machine classified as a non living thing.
Output
anantha and a rock a child and a toy, a teenager and a video game machine