yes
The word "abiotic" is an adjective. It describes nonliving factors in an ecosystem, such as temperature or soil composition.
It is both because soil is not living But, it also has dead organisms in it.
Yes, soil contains both biotic (living) and abiotic (non-living) components. Biotic components include microorganisms, plants, and small animals, while abiotic components include minerals, water, air, and organic matter. Together, these components contribute to the overall health and fertility of the soil.
No, redwood trees are not an abiotic factor. Abiotic factors refer to non-living components of an ecosystem such as sunlight, temperature, and soil. Redwood trees are a living organism, belonging to the biotic component of an ecosystem.
Abiotic components of a plain include soil, water, sunlight, air, and minerals. These non-living components provide essential resources and conditions for the survival of plants and animals in the plain ecosystem.
Soil is an abiotic factor.
Abiotic resources are sunlight , temperatuer, water ,soil etc.
Soil is considered an abiotic factor in an ecosystem because it is a non-living component that influences the living organisms within it. It provides physical support, nutrients, and habitats for organisms but does not have life in itself.
Yes it is. Abiotic factors are non-living factors.
the abiotic factor nutrients in the soil are ferilizers
the soil and water
it's not
abiotic factor
The word "abiotic" is an adjective. It describes nonliving factors in an ecosystem, such as temperature or soil composition.
Abiotic factors are soil, sand, gravel, rocks, water, light.
Prairie soil is considered an abiotic factor. Abiotic factors are non-living components of an ecosystem, such as soil, temperature, and water. Biotic factors, on the other hand, are living organisms that interact with each other and their environment.
Soil, sand, rocks, water, air are all abiotic factors found in the desert.