It is very unlikely that the government is cloning people by breeding them from body cells found in the city sewage. First, there is no record of anyone successfully cloning a human being anywhere in the world at this stage. Second, even if it were successful, the "person" created would be of little use to the "creator" for many reasons. One is that the person must be "brought up" so that it can behave in a normal manner to fit in to whatever purpose it is meant to achieve. To do this, a pair of "foster parents" would also need to be employed by the "creator" and there are very few people who would willingly take on such a peculiar task. And why would a government want cloned people? They can't be programmed and controlled as robots. We don't have anything like the understanding of the human brain to be able to control a person with electronic signals from a director or computer program. Real and ordinary people, willing to do for the government what it wants are much cheaper and reliable than clones. The idea of an army of clones being used as a police force, an army or a branch of the FBI is still in the children's Science Fiction class.
Opinions on cloning are diverse and vary among individuals and groups. Some people support cloning for medical research, while others have ethical concerns about the implications of cloning on identity, genetic diversity, and the sanctity of life. Overall, public opinion on cloning is not uniform and can depend on specific contexts and applications.
Cloning is the process of creating an identical copy of an organism or individual. People may be upset about cloning for various reasons, including ethical concerns about interfering with nature, fears about the potential misuse of cloning technology, and issues related to the welfare of cloned animals. Additionally, there are concerns about the implications of cloning for genetic diversity and the impact it could have on larger ecosystems.
Opinions on cloning vary among people. Some see it as a scientific advancement with the potential to benefit society by helping in medical research and organ transplantation. Others have ethical concerns about the implications of human cloning and the potential for misuse.
Many people have a personal opinion on cloning. Most people do not think it is a good idea and there has even been a bill known as the Human Cloning prohibition Act made to Congress but was rejected. It was re-introduced again in May 2013.
Cloning humans raises ethical concerns and challenges around individuality, identity, and potential exploitation. Additionally, there are unresolved scientific and technical challenges, such as high rates of failure and health risks for the cloned individual. Overall, the ethical and practical implications of human cloning outweigh any potential benefits.
secretly attack people
Muslim people along with Christians and Jewish people consider cloning a taboo, and forbid it.
No but some are and all people are secretly bad to some extent.
Some people object to cloning because it allows scientists to "act like God" in the manipulation of living organisms.
Opinions on cloning are diverse and vary among individuals and groups. Some people support cloning for medical research, while others have ethical concerns about the implications of cloning on identity, genetic diversity, and the sanctity of life. Overall, public opinion on cloning is not uniform and can depend on specific contexts and applications.
As far as is known no human cloning has taken place. Yet.
people like mushoe pork on wensdays The, "Stop Cloning Act" of 1997
Human cloning and animal cloning both involve creating a genetic copy of an organism, but there are differences in the ethical and legal considerations surrounding each. Human cloning raises complex ethical issues related to human rights and medical ethics, while animal cloning is primarily focused on agricultural and scientific applications. Additionally, the technologies and procedures used for human cloning may differ from those used for animal cloning.
Cloning is the process of creating an identical copy of an organism or individual. People may be upset about cloning for various reasons, including ethical concerns about interfering with nature, fears about the potential misuse of cloning technology, and issues related to the welfare of cloned animals. Additionally, there are concerns about the implications of cloning for genetic diversity and the impact it could have on larger ecosystems.
No one.
cose their fools
Opinions on cloning vary among people. Some see it as a scientific advancement with the potential to benefit society by helping in medical research and organ transplantation. Others have ethical concerns about the implications of human cloning and the potential for misuse.