Yes Because the number of worms remained constant in bin 1
Oparin's hypothesis proposed that Earth's early atmosphere could have supported the formation of organic molecules, providing the foundational idea for Miller and Urey's experiment. Miller and Urey's experiment aimed to simulate early Earth conditions and demonstrated that organic molecules, including amino acids, could indeed be produced in a laboratory setting, supporting Oparin's hypothesis.
Apex: conclusion
Both a theory and a hypothesis are proposed explanations for a phenomenon in science. However, a hypothesis is a specific, testable prediction made before conducting an experiment, while a theory is a well-substantiated explanation supported by a large body of evidence.
The degree to which a hypothesis is supported depends on the evidence available. If data and research findings align with the hypothesis and suggest a pattern or relationship, it can be considered supported. Further testing and analysis are often needed to strengthen the level of support for a hypothesis.
The Miller-Urey experiment simulated the conditions of early Earth by creating a mixture of gases believed to be present in the atmosphere at that time, such as methane, ammonia, and water vapor. This mixture was then subjected to electrical sparks to mimic lightning, which was thought to have been a common occurrence on early Earth. The experiment resulted in the formation of organic molecules, including amino acids, which are the building blocks of life. This supported the hypothesis that the basic building blocks of life could have formed spontaneously on early Earth.
Scientists then state another hypothesis and test it out with another experiment.
test your hypothesis.
That depends on the result of the experiment. The experiment is a way to test a hypothesis, and it's completely fine if the experiment disproves the hypothesis. Ideally, though, the experiment will support the hypothesis.
To determine whether Fleming's hypothesis should be supported or rejected based on an experiment, one would need to analyze the results of the experiment in relation to the hypothesis. If the data from the experiment aligns with the predictions made by Fleming's hypothesis, then it should be supported. However, if the results contradict the hypothesis, it may need to be rejected or revised.
If the hypothesis is supported in an experiment, the expected outcome or result predicted by the hypothesis will likely be observed. This would provide evidence to validate the hypothesis and support the initial reasoning or explanation provided.
A hypothesis cannot be call a theory because,it has not supported a prediction even in the face of several experiment.
When their hypothesis for the conducted experiment is accurate.
That's the first step.
An answer to your hypothesis supported by your experiment and data from previous experiment's about the same idea
1)initial observation 2)hypothesis 3)experiment 4)observation and analysis of data Between-hypothesis not supported New hypothesis New experiment New. Observation 5)Interpretation 6)Final hypothesis supported
mendel hypothesized that gametes have only one factor or alle for each inherited trait. this hypothesis is supported by the observation that?
No. An hypothesis is an idea put forward to explain an observation. Often you do the experiment to test the hypothesis. The results of the experiment may help you decide whether to discard your hypothesis or to test it further.