If the cell has a cell wall, it is a plant cell.
An Electron Microscope is used to study the contents of a nucleus.
cells are so small we cannot see color with a microscope or electron microscope. People do die them. It is probably clear because it is fluid.
An electron microscope can only operate inside a vacuum chamber. A good vacuum, needed so that electrons do not collide with air molecules or dirt before reaching the sample and the detector coming back, would be 1e-7 Torr or below. Your sample (the object of interest) has to be small enough to be mounted on a pedestal, which is inserted into chamber where the electron beam will be. The pedestal has to have multiple degrees of freedom so the e-beam can interrogate at various angle and position. The last requirement would be that your sample does not charge up too easily, which will distort the image. Charging can be lessened with a flash of gold. Hence, if your sample meets the requirements listed, you should be able to see its image on a monitor just as clearly as you see an object of a much larger scale, with an optical microscope. Any items that are detrimental to a vacuum formation (moist, spongy materials, for example) should probably be avoided. From an electron microscope, I have seen something as big as the compound eyes of a fly or a feature as small as 1 nm.
The first compound microscope showed up around the 1500s in the Netherlands. It was probably invented by Hans Lippershey to Zacharias Janssen.
because then we can know more about the things that surround us. And it'd probably be better to have separate sscientists studying separate subjects instead of one scientist studying them all
An Electron Microscope is used to study the contents of a nucleus.
Probably an electron microscope.
You're probably thinking of the scanning electron microscope. But it could be anything. Your question is not specific enough.
Probably a microscope would be the best to magnify something 20 times. add simple lenses and couplets have fairly serious limitations beyond 8 - 10 times.
Bacteria are generally very small - so you would need an electron microscope to see them in any detail. Under a light microscope you would probably only be able to see the overall shape.
cells are so small we cannot see color with a microscope or electron microscope. People do die them. It is probably clear because it is fluid.
Electron scanning would probably be best.
cells are so small we cannot see color with a microscope or electron microscope. People do die them. It is probably clear because it is fluid.
High powered, high resolution microscopes.
Probably surgical tools like scapels and tweezers.
The resolution had limitations of 200 nanometers.
The scanning electron microscope is probably the answer you are looking for, in which a beam of electrons is bounced from the surface of the specimen - usually prepared with an incredibly thin film of metal over its surface to make the electrons bounce from the surface better and not penetrate the specimen too far - and the electrons imaged