If a healthy human clone would exist (they don't as of yet, since cloning is quite difficult to do and human cloning is illegal in most nations), it would need to eat. This is because the clone is still a human being and as such it has the same basic needs such as food, oxygen etc. It will also have feelings and be capable of thought just like any other human.
No. The fact that the science of cloning is not that far along determines that it can't be done. Cats, dogs, and sheep have been cloned but not humans. There may come time when this is possible and when that happens laws will prevent a clone without your permission.
A man may take HCG (human chorionic gonadotropin) for medical reasons such as treating low testosterone levels or infertility.
I would say 'Oh No, another poor relation looking to me for support." Opinion 2: I say "Oh great, another person to spam wikianswers.com with stupid questions that really shouldn't be answered."
We do not have any means by which we can accelerate aging or development in order to make a clone that is the same age as the organism from which it was cloned, and I do not expect that any such technique will be developed, either. If you are cloned, your clones are going to be younger than you are.
I'm fairly certain human cloning is illegal in most places, but considering there was a clone of you, they would be a human being and as such killing them would be murder.
No, becuasse when you clone a human then they have no feelings and the clone will get beat up and probably die. SO, therefore, cloning a human would be totally... useless. Cloning is dangourus because it enharets the same genetic mutation as the person before it, therefor meaning if a person got arthuridus at 15 the clone would have it when it was born. if they cloned a 30 year old woman and she had kidney problems and acholhal problems, when her clone is born it would need achohol to survive, and it would have kidney problems.
No humans have been cloned yet. Should a human ever be cloned, then presumably, the clone would be identical (genetically) to the original from which it is copied; thus, it would be a human.
I would clone myself
I would clone myself
No, a clone will not have the same mindset as the original. While a clone shares the same genetic material, its personality, thoughts, and experiences are shaped by its unique environment and life experiences. Cloning does not replicate memories or consciousness, so the clone would develop its own distinct identity.
It is really expensive to clone a human. It can cost anywhere from $1.7 million to $2.0 million. Cloning is not available to the public as of now. Wait a few years and you never know.
No you would not get hurt.
If a healthy human clone would exist (they don't as of yet, since cloning is quite difficult to do and human cloning is illegal in most nations), it would need to eat. This is because the clone is still a human being and as such it has the same basic needs such as food, oxygen etc. It will also have feelings and be capable of thought just like any other human.
Of course
It's mostly to do with ethics and laws. Imagine if you were to clone yourself. Would the clone have rights? Would it be a citizen? What if you killed it, or it killed you?
A clone would be a twin made by science