In the science, evolution means change over time. These changes are selected by the environment. What genes (traits) that will allow a species to survive will be passed on to the next generations.
Rather both. Evolution, the change in allele frequency over time in a population of organisms, is an observed and observable fact. The theory of evolution by natural selection explains this fact with overwhelming evidences from many different disciplines.
To disprove evolution, one would need to provide scientifically-backed evidence that cannot be explained by evolutionary theory, such as finding a fossil in a rock layer that it should not be in based on the geological timescale, or demonstrating a complex biological structure that could not have evolved through gradual processes. However, the overwhelming evidence from multiple scientific fields strongly supports the theory of evolution.
Edwin Darwin did not propose a separate theory on evolution. The theory of evolution is commonly attributed to Charles Darwin, who put forth the concept of natural selection as the mechanism driving evolution. Edwin Darwin does not have a notable theory associated with evolution.
No, it is not scientifically possible for a gorilla to mate with a human due to genetic differences between the two species.
Evolution is a noun.
Because it was Darwin who made it a scientifically plausible explanation, by providing a mechanism by which evolution could occur....Natural Selection.
They do not. Nothing "disproves" evolution. It is impossible to prove or disprove anything scientifically. That's a basic rule of science: everything is subjected to doubt.
5
it is totally wrong for human to bear twins, i mean scientifically.
Your mom. no
Not sure what you mean by "scientifically funny", but a joke can be both scientific, i.e. about some science topic (and perhaps even scientifically accurate), and funny.
It is NOT scientifically disputed as the overwhelming number of scientists accept evolutionary theory. Those scientists, and others, that do not accept the theory do so for religiously ideological reasons, though they try to rationalize this by pseudo scientific proposals.
Scientifically, massive does not necessarily mean huge, though it does not preclude that meaning either, rather massive implies that the item being described merely has mass.
That he was teaching the scientifically proven method of evolution rather than the literal translation of The Bible.
Yes, When asteroids join and start building up. No, that's not scientifically realistic. What I mean is that astronomers calculate that it will not happen at this stage of the Solar System's evolution. It's all based on mathematics, I think.
scientifically, nothing.
energy is scientifically defined as the ability to do work.