To positively identify a person with fingerprints, forensic experts compare the unique ridge patterns and minutiae points found in the fingerprints of the individual in question to a known set of fingerprints in a database. If there is a match in the ridge patterns and minutiae points with a high degree of certainty, then the person can be positively identified.
I do not think that there is really a purpose of making fingerprints not on purpose anyways. Fingerprints are mostly made because of the oil of our fingers. Answer 2: Assuming you mean why is is that some agencies take your fingerprint (police, CBP...). Its because each individual has its own unique fingerprint mening that is you have someone fingerprint you can identify him. In most crimes fingerprints are left behind and these can be collected and matched with fingerprints on database to identify the suspect.
A fingerprint identifies you as a person. At least, I think so. Chimpanzees also have fingerprints, and if the police found a chimp fingerprint on a stolen car, they'd probably think it was from a human. But it wouldn't match any known criminals. Let's just take your left thumbprint. It's different from your other thumb. It's different from mine, and it's different from everyone else's, even your "identical" twin's thumbprint.
A mosquito can bite a person in a matter of seconds.
Because it is now accepted as scientific fact that virtually everyone in the world has different fingerprints. This makes it statistically unlikely that anyone but you could have been at the scene of the crime.
To identify the spider you found in your garden, take a clear photo and compare it to images of common garden spiders online or consult with a local expert.
to positivley identify a person using fingerprints you need at least 12 points unique to that person ._. A&W
to positivley identify a person using fingerprints you need at least 12 points unique to that person ._. A&W
Oh, dude, to positively identify someone using fingerprints, you gotta match the unique patterns and ridges on their fingertips to a known set of prints. It's like a fingerprint puzzle, but instead of fitting together pieces, you're comparing swirls and loops. So, yeah, it's all about finding that perfect fingerprint match and being like, "Yep, that's our guy!"
I do not think that there is really a purpose of making fingerprints not on purpose anyways. Fingerprints are mostly made because of the oil of our fingers. Answer 2: Assuming you mean why is is that some agencies take your fingerprint (police, CBP...). Its because each individual has its own unique fingerprint mening that is you have someone fingerprint you can identify him. In most crimes fingerprints are left behind and these can be collected and matched with fingerprints on database to identify the suspect.
You never get exempt from fingerprints. NEVER. Some jobs require fingerprints and to even begin to take classes in education fingerprints are required. If you want the job, classes, or drivers license you give fingerprints.
I would imagine, I never tested, that it is possible but unlikely. Due to the secretions and daily chemical and biological activities that take place, the fingerprints would be degraded.
ink
Example a person touches a table, put a scotchtape at that spot quickly before the person sees and when you take out back the scotchtape, you will see the person's fingerprint.
Police take people's fingerprints to create a record in case they commit a crime in the future, as fingerprints are unique to each individual and can be used for identification purposes. Fingerprints help law enforcement link individuals to past criminal activity and aid in solving cases.
they use science by looking for dna in fingerprints and they also look for clues and can take evidence and find things like hair and shoe marks on it to identify someone
Any trained and quaified law enforcement official or civilian techinician can take fingerprints which should be suitable for processing.
No person has the same fingerprints they are a unique form of identification, so if a fingerprint can be matched with a print found at the scene of a crime the owner of the print must have be at or at least touched something found at the scene.