fossils show the bone structure of ancient animals. you can see remarkable similarities between them and animals today. For example, the bone structure of many dinosaurs were very similar to that of birds today. For humans we found a bunch of steps on our evolution that is very good evidence of it.
Fossil record: Shows a pattern of gradual change in species over time, supporting the idea of common ancestry and evolution. Comparative anatomy: Similarities in bone structure and body plans among different species suggest they share a common evolutionary history. DNA evidence: Genetic similarities between different species reveal evolutionary relationships and provide strong support for the theory of evolution.
Scientists use various types of evidence to support evolution, including fossil records showing transitional forms, the distribution of species around the world, comparative anatomy and embryology, genetic similarities among organisms, and observed instances of natural selection. These different lines of evidence provide a strong basis for understanding the process of evolution.
Because there's supporting evidence for it. Lots of supporting evidence. Overwhelming, awe-inspiring amounts of supporting evidence.A scientific theory is not just a guess. My chemistry teacher explained it this way: a theory is something we can explain (the theory of evolution or the theory of relativity). A law is something we can't explain (the law of gravity. We know it works, we're just not sure exactly why or how).Charles Darwin spent years developing his hypothesis of natural selection. There is ample evidence supporting his final theory, some found long after his death. To this day, archeologists still find fossil evidence that fits into Darwin's explanation of changing species.
On almost a monthly basis, more data comes to light in the form of new fossils and other finds, that further support the Theory of Evolution.Charles Darwin (1809-1892) was not the first to study evolution, but he developed the Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection after observing the evidence for evolution during his voyage in HMS Beagle, and followed up by decades of research. This theory says that species evolved over time in response to changes in the natural environment, and was seen by scientists as the best explanation for the facts.There is ample evidence of the transition from one species to another, demonstrating that evolution really did occur. Conversely, there is no real evidence that evolution has not occurred. Those who debate the facts of evolution are left with unsupported hypotheses, often claiming that the world is too young for evolution to have occurred, or that the Laws of Thermodynamics disprove the theory. A third viewpoint is offered by a minority of creationists, such as Willian Dembski. As a qualified scientist, he accepts the immense age of the earth and the reality of evolution, but believes that there may be natural systems that cannot be explained entirely in terms of natural causes and that exhibit features characteristic of intelligent design.For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
The basis for evolution is the process of natural selection, which drives the gradual change in the genetic makeup of a species over time. Individuals with advantageous traits are more likely to survive and reproduce, passing on their genes to the next generation. This leads to the accumulation of beneficial traits in a population over generations.
The basis for all science, be it evolution or the study of how squeaky noises annoy people, is evidence. Darwin's primary evidence for evolution by natural selection was morphological homology; physical similarities between species. Modern evidence for evolution by natural selection is vast and includes a rich fossil record, well understood geologic evidence, radioisotopic evidence, as well as a host of genetic evidence from protein homologies to complex molecular systematics. All evidence for evolution converges on the singular observation that all organisms can be organized in a nested hierarchy much like a family tree; a Tree of Life.
Fossil record: Shows a pattern of gradual change in species over time, supporting the idea of common ancestry and evolution. Comparative anatomy: Similarities in bone structure and body plans among different species suggest they share a common evolutionary history. DNA evidence: Genetic similarities between different species reveal evolutionary relationships and provide strong support for the theory of evolution.
The evidence for animal and human evolution is so overwhelming that it is not possible to list it all within the scope of a short .Following decades of research, Charles Darwin published his book, The Evolution of Species in 1859. This contains copious evidence for evolution by natural selection, yet Darwin barely touched on the wealth of detail that we now have on evolution.Darwin, writing at a time when the known fossil record was scanty, barely touched on what we now know. We now have an extensive fossil record of the evolution of numerous species, with intermediate forms showing how one species or genus has gradually evolved into others.A good scientific theory should be able to predict facts that we do not yet know. The discoverers of Tiktaalik Roseaebelieved that the Theory of Evolution predicted that a species intermediate between fish and amphibians should be discovered in specific rock layers of a proposed search area, went there and soon found what they were looking for.Recent advances in our knowledge of DNA now mean that we have another scientific basis for animal evolution. For example, scientists can use DNA evidence to ascertain that our human ancestors diverged from the ancestors of the chimpanzee some seven million years ago. That this seems consistent with the dossil record should not be regarded as a mere coincidence.
Scientists use various types of evidence to support evolution, including fossil records showing transitional forms, the distribution of species around the world, comparative anatomy and embryology, genetic similarities among organisms, and observed instances of natural selection. These different lines of evidence provide a strong basis for understanding the process of evolution.
Paleobotany is the study of pre-historic plants on the basis of fossil evidence while Paleontology is the study of life in prehistoric times by using fossil evidence. The only similarity is that they both gain their evidences from fossils.
Beliefs that have a scientific basis are those that are supported by empirical evidence, rigorously tested, and peer-reviewed. Examples include the theory of evolution, the germ theory of disease, and the evidence for climate change caused by human activities.
Halogens are not the basis of all fossil fuels. Fossil fuels are primarily composed of hydrocarbons, which are compounds made of hydrogen and carbon. Halogens like chlorine, bromine, and fluorine are not key components of fossil fuels.
Because there's supporting evidence for it. Lots of supporting evidence. Overwhelming, awe-inspiring amounts of supporting evidence.A scientific theory is not just a guess. My chemistry teacher explained it this way: a theory is something we can explain (the theory of evolution or the theory of relativity). A law is something we can't explain (the law of gravity. We know it works, we're just not sure exactly why or how).Charles Darwin spent years developing his hypothesis of natural selection. There is ample evidence supporting his final theory, some found long after his death. To this day, archeologists still find fossil evidence that fits into Darwin's explanation of changing species.
no
yea
Evolution
No, halogens are not the basis of all fossil fuels. Fossil fuels are primarily made up of hydrocarbons, which are compounds of hydrogen and carbon. Halogens, like chlorine and fluorine, are not typically found in significant amounts in fossil fuels.