Fitness in Darwinian evolution refers to an organism's ability to survive and reproduce in a given environment. Organisms with traits that enhance their ability to survive and produce offspring are considered more fit, leading to a higher likelihood of passing on their genes to future generations. Thus, fitness is a key factor in natural selection, shaping the characteristics of populations over time.
Strictly speaking, reproductive fitness is meant. The organism that has the most and best quality progeny adapted to the immediate environment will leave more representations of it's alleles in the population gene pool and the allel frequency will change over time fulfilling the definition of evolution.
Better adaptions in the immediate environment leading to greater reproductive success. All organisms in a population are variations and in the immediate environment some organisms are better suited to survive and reproduce against their conspecifics. They have greater fitness.
Look, Charles Darwin never addressed the issue of biogensis beyond speculation if that. Darwinian Evolution is only concerned with how do existing organisms give rise to new species, arguing that species are not immutable and give rise to new species, ie, life from existing life. In "Origin of Species" he presents the mechanism of evolution, remarkable since he did not know of Mendel's work or the existence of DNA! To say Darwinian Evolution claims life from non organic beginnings is erroneous and if propagated, deceitful. If you decide to challenge Darwinian Evolution then, please, do so from a position of understanding - read the book or take a course in Evolutionary Biology.
Darwinian evolution is based on the idea of natural selection, where individuals with advantageous traits are more likely to survive and reproduce, leading to the gradual accumulation of these traits in a population over generations. In contrast, Lamarckian evolution suggests that acquired traits during an individual's lifetime can be passed on to offspring. Specific clues that distinguish these explanations include the basis for inheritance of traits (genetic in Darwinian vs. acquired in Lamarckian) and the mechanism of how populations change over time (gradual accumulation of genetic changes in Darwinian vs. direct transfer of acquired traits in Lamarckian).
A key distinction between Darwinian and Lamarckian explanations is the inheritance of acquired traits: Lamarck proposed that organisms could pass on traits acquired during their lifetime to their offspring, while Darwin's theory of natural selection relies on genetic variation and heritability of selected traits over generations. Additionally, Darwinian evolution emphasizes gradual changes through natural selection acting on variation within populations, whereas Lamarckian evolution suggests that organisms can adapt quickly and purposefully to their environment.
Strictly speaking, reproductive fitness is meant. The organism that has the most and best quality progeny adapted to the immediate environment will leave more representations of it's alleles in the population gene pool and the allel frequency will change over time fulfilling the definition of evolution.
Better adaptions in the immediate environment leading to greater reproductive success. All organisms in a population are variations and in the immediate environment some organisms are better suited to survive and reproduce against their conspecifics. They have greater fitness.
Darwinian evolution is descent with modification and natural selection, or, in other terms, reproductive variation and differential reproductive success.
Darwinian fitness measures the reproductive success of a species. This measures how much of a contribution a specific individual contributes to their species' gene pool, and whether certain gene mutations within an individual will or will not have an overall effect on the gene pool of a species as a whole.
Religious scriptures about Darwinian evolution by variation and selection? None that I am aware of.
Darwinian evolution is descent with modification and natural selection, or, in other terms, reproductive variation and differential reproductive success.
Fitness (in Darwinian terms).
The Darwinian model of evolution by natural selection has not been disproved.
Darwinism has to do with evolution, not with the analysis of truth or other philosophical questions.
Look, Charles Darwin never addressed the issue of biogensis beyond speculation if that. Darwinian Evolution is only concerned with how do existing organisms give rise to new species, arguing that species are not immutable and give rise to new species, ie, life from existing life. In "Origin of Species" he presents the mechanism of evolution, remarkable since he did not know of Mendel's work or the existence of DNA! To say Darwinian Evolution claims life from non organic beginnings is erroneous and if propagated, deceitful. If you decide to challenge Darwinian Evolution then, please, do so from a position of understanding - read the book or take a course in Evolutionary Biology.
In looking for a logo, an ape would epitomize the Darwinian theory of evolution.
The general definition is the gradual change of form from one thing to another. You could, for example, speak of the "evolution of the automobile" from the Model A to the latest muscle car.When the word is called up, however, it usually is short for Darwinian evolution, a theory about how living species came to be as the descendents of other species. There are a number of mechanisms to Darwinian evolution which seem to nonplus some people because they feel these have theological implications.In simplest terms, Darwinian evolution is in counterpoint to special creation, which is the belief that species do not change, but have remained essentially constant since their inception.