Scientific theories do not " prove " things, they explain things. So, before the big bang is not yet explained, as an example.
Yes, theories can be disproven if evidence is found that directly contradicts their predictions or explanations. This is a fundamental part of the scientific method, where theories are continuously tested and revised based on new evidence.
The endosymbiotic theory is widely accepted as a strong scientific hypothesis; however, definitive proof is challenging due to the lack of direct observational evidence from billions of years ago when the theorized events occurred. While there is substantial supporting evidence, such as the similarities between organelles like mitochondria and chloroplasts with free-living bacteria, the theory cannot be definitively proven beyond any doubt.
This statement is correct because a hypothesis is a proposed explanation that has not been validated through experimentation and evidence. Scientific inquiry aims to test and gather evidence to support or reject a hypothesis, rather than proving it true. It is always possible for new evidence or data to emerge that could challenge or refine a hypothesis.
Evolution is widely accepted by the scientific community because it is supported by mountains of evidence from various fields like genetics, paleontology, and biochemistry. It is considered a scientific theory, which means it is a well-substantiated explanation based on evidence. Biblical Creation, on the other hand, is a belief based on religious texts rather than empirical evidence, and therefore is not considered a scientific explanation.
This statement means that no scientific theory is considered absolute or final. Theories are continually analyzed, tested, and refined based on new evidence and research. They can be revised or even replaced as our understanding of the natural world evolves.
No, a scientific theory cannot be proven. Instead, it is supported by evidence and can be further validated through experimentation and observation.
Scientific law is proven (for the most part) and scientific theory is not proven yet."However scientific law is a law that cannot be broken.
A scientific hypothesis is an educated guess of what will happen in the experiment. A scientific theory is someone's thoughts on why something happened in an experiment. However, this cannot be proven. The opposite of this is a scientific law. This is statement of what will always happen under the same conditions.
I believe in Qur'anic/Biblical Theory because it can easily be proven... while scientific theory has many flaws and cannot be proven...
it is your thought or opinion on something, it cannot be proven.... like the Big Bang theory
theory
A scientific law is something that has been proved again and again under experimentation, and is always true. A scientific theory is an educated guess made based off of a group of data that is not proven to be true. For example, Newton's Laws are scientific laws since they have been proven to be always true. The theory of gravity is a scientific theory because gravity itself has not been completely proven to exist.
scientific theory is something they believe and a law is something that always happensscientific law means a phenomenon of nature that has been proven to inveriable occur whenever certain conditions excistscientific law: a statement or equation that can predict what will happen in certain situationsscientific theory: a scientific explanation that connects and explains many observations
scientific law is unlike a scientific theory in a sense that its the next step above a scientific theory.A scientific law is one that has been proven, a scientific theory has not been proven yet.
BASIC ANSWER>! Scientific law is proven (for the most part) and scientific theory is not proven yet."However scientific law is a law that cannot be broken and scientific theory is an attempt to explain a pattern or a rule repeadetly observed in nature".
A scientific theory is accepted as factual even though it hasn't been proven. A scientific law has been proven as fact.
I believe that a conclusion is a proven idea or experiment with complete evidence, while a theory cannot be totally proven but has been tested enough to be widely believed and accepted by the scientific community.