if homo sapiens evolved from monkey-like beings, from where are those monkey-like beings?
actually, the contributor above me is a tiny bit incorrect in his inquiry. humans and apes evolved from the same species, now extinct. evidence shows that humans and apes originated around the same time from one type of animal. so really we both are deformities or sub-species that have evolved and adapted from a greater race of intelligent species. and as for where that greater race is from, it also was most likely a variation an animal from a later evolutionary period, most likely when mammals were formed. so a question you might ask - from what period were the ancestors of humans and apes formed??
I have no questions about the evidence for evolution. It is as solid as a theory can possibly be. Quite simply, more individuals of any species are born than can survive to reproduce. If a population isn't limited by outside factors, it overpopulates an area to the point of depleting all resources. Because most individuals die without reproducing, the ones that survive pass on any useful traits they had that gave them the advantage so they could survive. Over many generations, these advantages accumulate, and after a much longer time, a more adapted species can evolve.
We can see this happening rapidly when humans select certain domestic plants or animals for their desirable traits, creating new varieties. We can also see it in weeds that have developed herbicide resistance, insects that are resistant to insecticide, and pathogens that are antibiotic resistant, all within a few decades.
I am very pleased that life evolved, otherwise I would not be here. But perhaps the question was intended to ask whether I believe that life evolved - the is 'yes'.
You can doubt evolution and anything else you want. The better question is if you should doubt evolution, or if you can reasonably doubt evolution in light of science. A lot of aspects concerning evolution are backed by rather sound science. That isn't to say that the theory of evolution explains everything. The earliest textbooks on the topic said that you had to take parts of it by faith. That is no different than believing what religion has to say about it. You do have to ask yourself how to reconcile the laws saying that matter and energy cannot be created nor destroyed with the Big Bang Theory. Since if there was nothing, then you must ask where all the "something" suddenly come from.
The correct question to ask would have been "Monomers that are found in proteins are called _______?" but to answer your question, Monomers that are in proteins are called amino acids.
This is not a question. Please ask a question in order to receive an answer.
It would be hard but not impossible, however a great deal of force would need to be applied and that kind of force is unlikely to be able to come from the average human. By the way why would you ask that?
no but who would ask this kind of question
What kind of person would ask a question like that?!
What the hell kind of sicko would ask that kind of question.
The same hoes who would ask this question.
of course not what kind of idiot would ask that question
No, what the hell would bring you to ask that kind of question?
wut would we do wen were r alone?
Answer Would you be so kind as to ask your question again as the one posted makes no sense.
she probably is i mean who would ask that kind of question
Nothing eats Brazil.... why would you even ask that..... what kind of person would ask a question like that...... A VERY STUPID ONE
Obviously a fox. What kind of idiot would ask a question like that?
A functionalist is a person who strongly believes in the purpose of an idea or a belief. One question a functionalist might ask would be, "Why do you believe in God?"