If the autopsy determines no accidental, self-inflicted, or felonious death then the results would remain private under the provisions of HIPPA, and released only to the next of kin. If the death were ruled suspicious or felonious, the results would become potential evidence of a crime and would not be released. The cause of death is very rarely released by the Medical Examiner's or Coronor's Office. There are no legal restrictions on the release of the cause of the death by family members, however.
For a scientist to argue that evolution does not exist based on DNA evidence, her findings would need to demonstrate that genetic mutations do not occur, that species do not share common ancestry, and that there is no evidence of natural selection influencing genetic variation over time. This would contradict the vast body of scientific evidence supporting the theory of evolution.
No, because vampires do not exist; they are fictional characters.
non-exist-ent
"Inhabit" is the word that means to exist or live within.
No, there are no bugs with red blood that exist in nature.
probably
No. Not A Photo Or A video
I do not believe dream sharing is possible
Yes.
Virtual autopsy, aka post-mortem-imaging is performed around the world to reduce the need for a standard autopsy, but also to add precision in the reporting and preparing the standard autopsy. For solutions see for example Sectra Visualization Table, http://www.sectra.com/medical/radiology_it/offering/visualization_table/forensics/index.html
I personally believe that it never existed but there have no findings of a body or anything so it may still exist.
No, this phenomenon doesn't exist.
No restrictions exist that limit hamsters to particular states.
Not in a beneveolent dictatorial society, but they rarely exist and ar often suspect.
Because elected officials stand to benefit too much from special interests who stand to benefit from the limited and hindered competition that trade restrictions produce.
While a 'benign' everyday item such as chewing gum is outlawed in Singapore, there exist no such restrictions on the use of paperclips.
This depends of the country. Political power may belong entirely to the monarch, entirely to a parliament, or somewhere in between. Countries where there are no restrictions on the power of the monarch are called absolute monarchies, whereas countries where restrictions exist are called constitutional monarchies.