When there is low genetic variation in a population the species produced are unlikely to withstand diseases.
Genetic Drift.
Genetic Drift
Adding individuals to a population.
inbreeding
A widespread disaster would reduce the variety within the human genetic pool by eliminating all but certain segments of the population. A global plague could potentially have the greatest effect, as plagues (see: black plague, Spanish influenza) often will often decimate all of a local population save for those with genetic immunity--thus standardizing that mutation in future populations. Global catastrophe could also inhibit travel, and would limit human reproduction to their immediate region, limiting the genetic range of potential offspring.
There would be less genetic variation in humans
It can provide resistance to diseases or other beneficial characteristics. -variation in more competitive species than our own can result in natural selection that is better focused to the specific environment: there is a bigger range of characteristics, so the best traits allow those members to survive longer and therefore mate more. This allows the species overall to constantly reproduce the beneficial traits and flourish.
The colony would have less genetic variation. The Bacteria in the colony would be too genetically similar
Genetic drift usually only has effect on the genetic diversity of small populations of a species. Often times, genetic drift can greatly reduce the diversity of a population if a significant percent of members of the population leave by a chance event (as opposed to natural selection.) This means that their alleles for various genes leave with them. Genetic drift does not always effect genetic diversity. Most of the time, it is the allele frequency that is affected by genetic drift. For example, if there are 60 long-finned bass and 40 short-finned bass living in a pond, the gene frequency ratio is 3:2. If 25 short-finned are fished out, the allele frequency is now 4:1. If all or most of the members of a population carrying a specific gene were removed from the population because of genetic drift, that would effect the genetic diversity.
Which would most likely decrease the genetic variation in the human population?
If the human population was reduced to a very small number of interbreeding individual then this small population, denied outbreeding, would have very little genetic variation. Humans, who went through a bottleneck event about 70,000 years ago, are considered a " small " species because they have little genetic variation in comparison to many other species. Google cheetah to see how this concept works.
A widespread disaster would reduce the variety within the human genetic pool by eliminating all but certain segments of the population. A global plague could potentially have the greatest effect, as plagues (see: black plague, Spanish influenza) often will often decimate all of a local population save for those with genetic immunity--thus standardizing that mutation in future populations. Global catastrophe could also inhibit travel, and would limit human reproduction to their immediate region, limiting the genetic range of potential offspring.
If the human population was reduced to a very small number of interbreeding individual then this small population, denied outbreeding, would have very little genetic variation. Humans, who went through a bottleneck event about 70,000 years ago, are considered a " small " species because they have little genetic variation in comparison to many other species. Google cheetah to see how this concept works.
If the human population was reduced to a very small number of interbreeding individual then this small population, denied outbreeding, would have very little genetic variation. Humans, who went through a bottleneck event about 70,000 years ago, are considered a " small " species because they have little genetic variation in comparison to many other species. Google cheetah to see how this concept works.
fukk e2020
A bottleneck event would decrease your population to a very small number and, consequently, your gene pool would contract, some alleles would be lost and genetic variability would decrease. Google Cheetahs.
If I'm not mistaken genetic drift is the random change in the genome of a population over time. This being said it would be possible that this random changing could eventually remove certain diversity from a population.
Genetic variation. If there were no variation in the genes/phenotype then natural selection would have nothing to select from.
it would get them high
There would be less genetic variation in humans
It can provide resistance to diseases or other beneficial characteristics. -variation in more competitive species than our own can result in natural selection that is better focused to the specific environment: there is a bigger range of characteristics, so the best traits allow those members to survive longer and therefore mate more. This allows the species overall to constantly reproduce the beneficial traits and flourish.