Spontaneous generation is wrong according to scientific understanding because it suggests that living organisms can arise from non-living matter without any external influence. This idea has been disproven through experiments and observations that show living organisms come from pre-existing life through processes like reproduction.
No, spontaneous generation has never occurred, and according to the law of biogenesis, it will never occur. The law of biogenesis, along with being the fundamental law of scientific study, states that living things can only come from living things, and this has consistenly remained correct through multifarious experiments, particularly those of Louis Pasteur and Francesco Redi. Because matter has no possibility of creating living matter, spontaneous generation has never occurred.
heterotrophs
Liver cells being generated by air.
No genes disappear in the F1 generation. Each of the F1 plants was heterozygous, having both dominant and recessive alleles. The recessive phenotype disappears in the F1 generation because all members of that generation carry a dominant allele. In the F2 generation, the recessive phenotype will reappear.
No genes disappear in the F1 generation. Each of the F1 plants was heterozygous, having both a dominant and recessive alleles. The recessive phenotype disappears in the F1 generation because all members of that generation carry a dominant allele. In the F2 generation, the recessive phenotype will reappear.
No, spontaneous generation has never occurred, and according to the law of biogenesis, it will never occur. The law of biogenesis, along with being the fundamental law of scientific study, states that living things can only come from living things, and this has consistenly remained correct through multifarious experiments, particularly those of Louis Pasteur and Francesco Redi. Because matter has no possibility of creating living matter, spontaneous generation has never occurred.
Not according to current scientific understanding.
heterotrophs
No, reversing time to undo past events is not possible according to current scientific understanding.
No, the speed of light has remained constant over time according to current scientific understanding.
According to current scientific understanding, it is not possible to travel faster than the speed of light.
According to current scientific understanding, nothing can travel faster than the speed of light in a vacuum.
According to current scientific understanding, nothing can travel faster than the speed of light in a vacuum.
According to current scientific understanding, nothing can travel faster than the speed of light in a vacuum.
According to current scientific understanding, nothing can travel faster than the speed of light in a vacuum.
According to current scientific understanding, space is curved by the presence of massive objects like stars and planets. This curvature is described by Einstein's theory of general relativity, which explains how gravity warps the fabric of space-time. The curvature of space affects the paths that objects follow through space, causing them to move in curved trajectories around massive objects.
Yes, according to Islamic teachings, the earth moves around the sun in an orbit set by Allah. This understanding aligns with the scientific consensus on planetary motion.