Some organisms are fastidious and others are non fastidious because they have different nutritional requirements. An organism with a complex nutritional requirement is a fastidious organism.
Fastidious organisms are bacteria that can't produce their own vitamins, so they usually acquire them from the host. They require special fortified agar to be grown in the laboratory. I assume non-fastidious organisms can produce their own nutrients and don't need the special agar! Hope that helps
It truly depends on the organism, some organisms instinctivly mutate due to their genetic nature. Where as others such as the mutated hemorrhagic influenza virus mutated through a non instinctive process.
The closest thing that we have to non cellular living organisms is viruses, and there is some debate about whether they qualify as living things, or should be regarded instead as self-replicating poisons.
Photoautotrophs are organisms that perform photosynthesis. Less commonly they can be called holophytes.Examples of non-plant photoautotrophs include:algaecyanobacteria
renewable
Fastidious organisms are bacteria that can't produce their own vitamins, so they usually acquire them from the host. They require special fortified agar to be grown in the laboratory. I assume non-fastidious organisms can produce their own nutrients and don't need the special agar! Hope that helps
Jade and soma
It truly depends on the organism, some organisms instinctivly mutate due to their genetic nature. Where as others such as the mutated hemorrhagic influenza virus mutated through a non instinctive process.
There are no non-living organisms, unless you mean dead organisms.
London busses, tube trains, people.
Non-symbiotic -- organisms are free-living; relationships not required for survival--Synergism -- members cooperate and share nutrients--Antagonism -- some member are inhibited or destroyed by others
consist of organisms and the non living things.
London busses, tube trains, people.
The closest thing that we have to non cellular living organisms is viruses, and there is some debate about whether they qualify as living things, or should be regarded instead as self-replicating poisons.
It depends on what you mean by non-mammals. If you are counting all matter as a non-mammal, then most non-mammals are not organisms. If you are counting a non-mammal as any life form or any animal that is not a mammal, then all non-mammals are organisms.
Some of them are but others arent
It can be by some, but in general it is non-reactive inside animal bodies.