Viruses are not an organism at all. They are not alive. They are like cockle burrs that "grab" hold of your clothing or a dog's coat. They are hijackers. Once they get attached to the cell of a living cell, they can take it over and "make" the living cell produce virus particles instead of cell parts. These particles can assemble into more viruses and then they break out of the cell (killing it) and begin the process again. They cannot make more viruses on their own.
Nonliving
yes
A molecule on its own is considered nonliving. Molecules are the building blocks of living organisms, but they do not exhibit life processes like growth, reproduction, or response to stimuli on their own.
The sky is nonliving, as it is composed of gases and does not have characteristics of living organisms. Pollution is also considered nonliving, as it consists of harmful substances that are released into the environment by human activities.
Viruses are generally considered nonliving because they cannot carry out essential life processes on their own, such as metabolism or reproduction. They require a host cell to replicate and carry out their life cycle.
Viruses, although the opinion on their non-living status may be changing.
because the organisms eat the dead / nonliving environment
the earth is nonliving but has living organisms on it
All organisms are living.
Your question is an oxymoron. Nonliving means they are dead. If it is dead it ceases to be an organism. Organisms are alive.
A house is considered nonliving as it does not possess biological functions or processes. It serves as a structure designed for human habitation and does not exhibit characteristics of living organisms like growth, reproduction, or response to stimuli.
Rocks are considered nonliving because they do not have the characteristics of living organisms such as growth, reproduction, or response to stimuli. Additionally, rocks are not composed of cells, which are the basic units of all living things.
no
No. It is nonliving.
Nonliving
yes
amaan