Horses don´t have chestnuts, it is a couler.
horses do have chestnuts on the inside of their legs, it is the traces of an old toe from prehistoric times when horses were more like dogs. it is said that the chestnut fuses the horses legs together inside the womb and it breaks during birth, im not sure if that is correct though.
These grow sometimes, and have to be cut down a little bit. If not, they will interfere with the horse's movement.
They are parts of old bone from there prehistoric times they used to be toes
Chestnuts, like all other fruit, drop from the tree after they are ripe.
Yes, actually, water chestnuts can be frozen. First you would want to put them in a plastic, airtight container to avoid freezer burn.
While water chestnuts are not tree nuts and are generally well tolerated by those with tree nut allergies, it is still possible for someone with a tree nut allergy to also be allergic to water chestnuts. An allergic reaction to water chestnuts in a person with a tree nut allergy would be classified as a separate allergy, not a cross-reaction. It is always best to consult with a healthcare provider for personalized advice and guidance.
Chestnuts are the fruit of the Horse Chestnut tree, Aesculus hippocastanum, so yes they are a form of tree nut.
A chestnut tree of the Chinese variety is capable of 100. Lbs of nuts when fully grown averages will vary depending on health of tree
All horses have the chestnuts on the inside of the legs.
no, chestnuts are not of use to horses. People believe way back when, horses had fingers and toes.
Chestnuts and Horse Chestnuts are not the same thing. Chestnuts are edible by humans. Horse Chestnuts (Buckeyes) are not edible and are generally considered poisonous --- even to horses!
A horses chestnuts are just like a human fingerprint, no two are exactly alike. The chestnuts could be used in much the same way as a human fingerprint for identifying a horse if a 'chestnut database' were set up.
The chestnuts on the insides of horses legs are the remaints of its "toes". When horses were first created, they were slightly bigger than a chicken(i know it sounds wierd!) but its true. Its name was Eohippus. Horses first had toes instead of hooves but over the years, they have become hooves.
I think so.
Yes, although they are more prominate on the front legs.
The chestnut on a horses leg is the remnant from when they were multi toed animals. The Chestnut has absolutely no bearing on if a horse can swim or not.
No, they are a bony protrusion with a gel like texture on the inside of a horses legs. i dont know who you are but i agree with you
Conkers
No, they are not. The nuts that are called chestnuts are poisonous to horses and ponies though.
Horse chestnuts are not safe for human consumption, as they contain a toxic compound called esculin. Consuming horse chestnuts can cause nausea, vomiting, and other serious health issues. It is important to avoid eating them.