Horses don´t have chestnuts, it is a couler.
horses do have chestnuts on the inside of their legs, it is the traces of an old toe from prehistoric times when horses were more like dogs. it is said that the chestnut fuses the horses legs together inside the womb and it breaks during birth, im not sure if that is correct though.
These grow sometimes, and have to be cut down a little bit. If not, they will interfere with the horse's movement.
They are parts of old bone from there prehistoric times they used to be toes
Not every horse may have a chestnut, but a lot of them do. This is because a chestnut is like a callous on the inside of a horse's leg (not under the skin, but not on the outside where it would face the world, it would face the horse's other leg. Sort of like the inside and outside direction in a round pin...)
no they only have 1 stomachs like humans
No,only two on their back legs
Chestnuts, like all other fruit, drop from the tree after they are ripe.
Yes, actually, water chestnuts can be frozen. First you would want to put them in a plastic, airtight container to avoid freezer burn.
No, absolutely not.
Chestnuts are the fruit of the Horse Chestnut tree, Aesculus hippocastanum, so yes they are a form of tree nut.
dunno Your a lot of help. this is 562beaver i can tell u... water chestnuts originated from china in the early 1900's. They are grown mostly in south of china near sub tropical climates, but now also grow in Asia and India, in marshes underwater in the mud as they need fertile soil and wet mud to grow. hope that helped :D..... i know that guy up there didn't
All horses have the chestnuts on the inside of the legs.
no, chestnuts are not of use to horses. People believe way back when, horses had fingers and toes.
Chestnuts and Horse Chestnuts are not the same thing. Chestnuts are edible by humans. Horse Chestnuts (Buckeyes) are not edible and are generally considered poisonous --- even to horses!
A horses chestnuts are just like a human fingerprint, no two are exactly alike. The chestnuts could be used in much the same way as a human fingerprint for identifying a horse if a 'chestnut database' were set up.
I think so.
The chestnuts on the insides of horses legs are the remaints of its "toes". When horses were first created, they were slightly bigger than a chicken(i know it sounds wierd!) but its true. Its name was Eohippus. Horses first had toes instead of hooves but over the years, they have become hooves.
Yes, although they are more prominate on the front legs.
I don't think so. See "Can you eat a pine cone".
The chestnut on a horses leg is the remnant from when they were multi toed animals. The Chestnut has absolutely no bearing on if a horse can swim or not.
Conkers
No, they are not. The nuts that are called chestnuts are poisonous to horses and ponies though.
No, they are a bony protrusion with a gel like texture on the inside of a horses legs. i dont know who you are but i agree with you