Mainly because they do not understand the process of evolution, or they refuse to believe it on fundamentalist grounds.
You are an example of human micro-evolution as the population of humans has changed allele frequency over time. Micro-evolution is just evolution; change over time.
An example of micro-evolution is the development of antibiotic resistance in bacteria due to natural selection. When exposed to antibiotics, bacteria with genetic mutations that provide resistance to the drug survive and reproduce, passing on the resistant trait to future generations. Over time, the proportion of resistant bacteria in the population increases, leading to the evolution of antibiotic-resistant strains.
In the past century there will be a different classification of human evolution
paleoanthropologist. They analyze fossils, artifacts, and other evidence to understand the origins and evolution of hominids and human ancestors.
The most important event in recent human evolution is the development of agriculture, which led to the rise of civilizations and significant changes in human societies, lifestyles, and technology.
People refused to believe in evolution of the human race.
They do not belive in the theory of evolution beacuse it contradicts the bible's idea that the human race was created in 6 days.
The missing link refers to a perceived gap in human evolution. Human evolution theories believe that human beings evolved from the common ape over many centuries of time.
I believe that yes you can alter human evolution not in the sense that you can change our very exsistence but in the sense that you could"ve postponed it. Such as the way we and other people interbreed some of the evolution of homo sapiens definitley formed that way but they were also already in exsistence and in competition with neanderthals. So yes I say you can alter it but no to that much of an extent.
Museum of Human Evolution was created in 2010.
The eye is a good example because there are living animals with eyes that represent each step in it's evolution. Human eyes also show how evolution can produce "bad" results; the retina is essentially "inside-out" - the nerves are on top and there is a blind-spot where the optic nerve leaves the eye.
You are an example of human micro-evolution as the population of humans has changed allele frequency over time. Micro-evolution is just evolution; change over time.
Biological anthropology is the branch of science that studies human evolution.
It is their right.
No. Jewish people follow an ethical code that is quite different from the beliefs of Christianity. For example, Jews do not accept that human sacrifice can lead to salvation, even if the human is part god.
People who study hominids are called paleoanthropologists. They specialize in the study of human evolution and the fossil record of early human ancestors.
Evolution is not a fact, but a theory. I, on the other hand, do NOT believe in evolution. People say that evolution is the forming of us humans from our old ancestors the apes, and gorillas, and monkeys... etc. So these people who do in fact believe in this, do they not ask themselves, are we going mad? the truth is, there is no real such thing as evolution, we have just changed due to the environment we have adapted to over the years. Neanderthals for example, were a 'sort' of intelligent species to roam this earth people say. Archaeologists have found skulls and what not, but the theory of apes is just a load of bull, respectively ofcourse. So to those who are reading this who believe in evolution, think to your self, how could we have formed form an ANIMAL to a HUMAN? The scientific name for ape is 'Hominoidea' and the scientific name for us humans is 'homosapiens'. Why? because we all have our unique DNA and personalities and we are all different. To respectively say, to the believers of evolution, do you really believe an animal somehow 'transformed' into a human. you might be thinking "well, an ape (or gorilla, monkey... etc.) might have had sex with a human" but also keep in mind, the baby that was produced, could it have been completely normal? or some kind of retarded donkey perhaps? it would have dies shorlty after the event anyways. no, did think of that..... the bible (i'm not christian), i'm sure has a sort of saying about evolution and we all turned from apes to humans, but a normal person's point of view, evolution is just a theory thought up by a man named Charles Darwin (dont like him either :P). He is known as the "father of biology, father of science even" but i wouldnt go as far as biology. so there you have it, hopefully i have convinced you, and a lot of other people out there.