So other scientists can test it out to confirm results. Theres no definite answer in science that's why its not provable, As fore falsible, idk what that means.
A hypothesis must be testable and able to be proved false because it is an educated guess based on other facts connected to the hypothesis. It must be testable so other scientists can agree with the hypothesis. It is not able to be provable because it is an educated guess.
testable, falsifiable, and based on prior knowledge or observations. The hypothesis should make clear predictions that can be tested through experimentation or observation to determine its validity.
Yes, a falsifiable hypothesis can be tested because it can be proven true or false through experimentation or observation. If evidence is found that contradicts the hypothesis, then it can be disproven. This process is essential in the scientific method to advance knowledge and understanding.
To be of any use to science, a hypothesis must be able to be tested. For instance, I might have a hypothesis that there is a civilization of giant butterfly people living in another galaxy. If I have no way to test this idea, then it really isn't a hypothesis. It would just be a wild guess.
A theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that is based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experimentation. A hypothesis, on the other hand, is a specific, testable prediction about what will happen in a given set of circumstances. In simple terms, a theory explains why something happens, while a hypothesis predicts what will happen.
A hypothesis must be testable and able to be proved false because it is an educated guess based on other facts connected to the hypothesis. It must be testable so other scientists can agree with the hypothesis. It is not able to be provable because it is an educated guess.
If a hypothesis does not generate any observational tests, there is nothing that a scientist can do with itRead more: Explain_why_a_hypothesis_must_be_testableANS2:If an hypothesis is not testable, it cannot be provable false. If it cannot be provable false it cannot be supported. If it cannot be supported, it adds nothing to science. An hypothesis is a "no-win" proposition. You need to try to prove it false. That being the case, you either prove it false (lose) or you fail to prove it false (lose). Failing to prove an hypothesis false is the basis for supporting it.
capable of being proven false. testable
testable
In Karl Popper's terminology there must be a way to prove a hypothesis false. That is what it means when scientists say that a specific hypothesis is a "testable hypothesis".
It must be possible to observe whether the hypothesis is true.
It must be testable.
It must be testable.
It must be possible to observe whether the hypothesis is true.
so it can be proven
Yes. A hypothesis must be testable to become a theory.
It must be testable, and must be falsify-able