So if your fingerprint is:
XXYYXYX
And the guilty persons DNA is:
XXXXYYY
It is impossible for you to be the guilty person. But, it is possible that my DNA fingerprint is also XXXXYYY - so please don't commit any crimes near my house or I might get nailed for it.
ANS2:DNA fingerprinting always has a margin of error. The error can introduce reasonable doubt. Guilt in a capital case must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt.Sydney Brenner
he introduced steam in order to improve upon joseph0 lister's work on antiseptics. Proving that steam killed more microorganisms than carbolic acid he invented aseptic surgical techniques
Karl Willhelm, a Swiss Botanist is given credit for discovering chromosomes.
Irregular bones have complicated shapes and therefore can not be classified in any of the shape based catergories. Their shapes are due to their function, for example, proving mechanical support for the body yet protecting the spinal cord, in the case of the veterbrae. Examples common to all are the vertebrae and some facial bones.
Proving that evolution happens can be challenging for a few reasons. Firstly, evolution occurs over long periods of time, making direct observation difficult. Additionally, the process of evolution involves gradual changes in populations, which can be difficult to track and measure. Lastly, the evidence for evolution is primarily based on indirect observations, such as fossil records and genetic analysis, which some skeptics may question.
Proving the victims were innocent(APEX)ChickenChickenChickenChickenChicken
In the US - defendants are not required to PROVE their innocence. However - if you are involved in a court action you would have already been indicted due to the existence of probable cause that you WERE involved in the offense. Then - instead of proving your innocence, you would have to present proof that you are NOT GUILTY.
It depends on the legislation of the country concerned. In most western countries you are presumed innocent until proven guilty
Mayor Quimby
There is more evidence to prove her innocence than proving her guilt.
Right-mind can prove his innocence by presenting evidence, such as alibis, witness testimonies, or documentation that supports his innocence. He can also provide any relevant information that may help establish his lack of involvement in the situation in question. Seeking legal assistance and cooperating with the authorities during the investigation process can also be crucial in proving his innocence.
Surely this is a joke? News for you, its not funny.
Tell your teacher the truth. If you really think they won't believe you, record a video of you(with the time and date showing clearly) proving that the internet is not working. I think they will understand. Besides, if you went to enough trouble to make a video proving your innocence, they can't say you were too lazy to do anything. Good luck.
Biometric
The charged party disputes the criminal action by pleading "not guilty" to the charges. The prosecution bears the burden of proving that the charged party is guilty of a criminal offense. The charged party is not required to "prove" innocence.
Proving the no victims were innocent
You can file a motion to re-open your case, but if you had advice of counsel and CHOSE to plead to the charge you would have to come up with some very convincing reason(s) why your case should be re-considered. Remember you no longer have the presumption of innocence, and the burden of proving your innocence now falls directly on you.