0
What else can I help you with?
Which do you suppose would be more harmful A mutation that changed the nucleotide sequence of an mRNA molecule or a mutation that changed the nucleotide sequence of a DNA molecule?
A mutation in a DNA nucleotide sequence would be more harmful than a mutation in a mRNA nucleotide sequence because it could cause the synthesis of multiple nonfunctional proteins in comparison to a mutation in a mRNA nucleotide sequence that would be less harmful because it would result in a few nonfunctional proteins.
How mutation affect survival skills of an organism?
It depends on the mutation. Some mutations have no effect on survival, some mutations are lethal, and some mutations make an individual better adapted to its environment, so it will be more fit than those without the mutation, and therefore produce more offspring with the same mutation, which could change the allele frequency of a population.
What is a mutation and explain when a mutation is beneficial?
A mutation is a permanent change in the DNA sequence of a gene. This can be beneficial if the change gives a new function to or improves the function of that gene. The above is a definition. But one must really define "beneficial". Some regard it as beneficial if it helps the specific individual who has it. Others would think it beneficial if it produced some survival advantage that insured more descendents for that individual. It is the difference between a mutation that allowed for greater athletic ability, but a decreased desire for offspring, versus a more moderate athletic enhancement, but a greater desire for offspring. The small percentage of ways to improve an organism, versus the near infinite ways of harming the organism, mean that most mutations are not going to be beneficial. At best, they will be "inconsequential" - such as a new shade of eye color, or a mole on a section of your skin. The populist notion of "powers" that can come from mutations is wildly inaccurate. Even assuming a minor power like the ability to see infra red radiation would take thousands upon thousands of mutations over vast amounts of time. A mutation for blindness is far more likely. It should also be noted that the traditional model of evolutionary theory no longer applies to man. We don't allow changes in our environment, and without such changes, there is no need for one trait more than another to predominate. After all, it is irrelevent that a mutation might allow for greater speed in running, when everyone drives a car.
What type of mutation is a beneficial to an organism?
Those that increase your health, your survival, your ability to have children and of course too many other benefits to name, here. Generally mutations are the key to natural selection. Beneficial mutations that occur allow an organism to survive longer, thus reproduce more, passing this mutated trait down to their offspring.
Are mutations always bad?
Mutations are not always bad, there are certain cases where a second mutation overcomes the effects caused by the initial mutation. Mutation may enable the mutant organism to withstand particular environmental stresses better than wild-type organisms, or reproduce more quickly. In these cases a mutation will tend to become more common in a population through natural selection. Carriers of the sickle cell allele are resistant to malaria, because the parasites that cause this disease are killed inside sickle-shaped blood cells. So, this suggests that mutations are not always bad, they are also beneficial some times.
How does mutation affect variation in species?
mutation really doesnt effect a population a mutation can be bad or good mutations can protect you from diseases or it can do something harmful to you like give u a extra body part or make you more vulnerable to diseases
Was the samurai warriors more beneficial or more harmful to Japan?
they were beneficial because they fought wars to protect their people.
Why do mutations tend to be harmful instead of helpful?
Not all mutations are harmful. The improvements in creatures through evolution are from beneficial mutations. The beneficial mutations increase the creature's chance of survival and passing along those new beneficial genes to its offspring.
What do you think will be the impact of this mutation?
It's difficult to predict the exact impact of a mutation without more specific information about it. Generally, mutations can lead to changes in an organism's traits, which can be beneficial, harmful, or have no noticeable effect. Further studies would be needed to assess the specific consequences of the mutation in question.
Which do you suppose would be more harmful A mutation that changed the nucleotide sequence of an mRNA molecule or a mutation that changed the nucleotide sequence of a DNA molecule?
A mutation in a DNA nucleotide sequence would be more harmful than a mutation in a mRNA nucleotide sequence because it could cause the synthesis of multiple nonfunctional proteins in comparison to a mutation in a mRNA nucleotide sequence that would be less harmful because it would result in a few nonfunctional proteins.
How do mutations play a note in evolutionary change?
Mutations take a huge part in evolutionary change for a few reasons. A species can be altered permanently if a mutation occurs that is beneficial. On the other hand, if a mutation that is harmful occurs, it will not be in the offspring most likely because of natural selection. Sometimes mutations will be dormant, but this isn't as big in evolution, but can be helpful if the environment changes and their mutation deals with something accepting more harsh conditions.
A mutation is harmful to an organism if?
Mutations are harmful if they decrease the function of some part of the body. Unfortunately, this is the case far more often than them making an improvement.
Were the actions of the industrialists were more beneficial to the US than they were harmful?
Most believe that the actions of the industrialists were more beneficial to the United States. The good things outweighed the bad things.
What does ceiling dose mean?
max dose with beneficial effects. anything more could be harmful
How can mutations be?
Mutations can be beneficial when they give an organism a characteristic that helps it thrive in its environment. A mutation that makes a prey animal faster or more easily camouflaged might be an example. Or a mutation that makes a predator stronger, or one that allows a plant to more easily withstand drought. They promote positive diversity within their species in a way that is beneficial to survival.
How mutation affect survival skills of an organism?
It depends on the mutation. Some mutations have no effect on survival, some mutations are lethal, and some mutations make an individual better adapted to its environment, so it will be more fit than those without the mutation, and therefore produce more offspring with the same mutation, which could change the allele frequency of a population.
What is a beneficial mutation for a koala?
A beneficial mutation for a koala could be one that enhances its ability to digest eucalyptus leaves more efficiently. This adaptation would allow koalas to extract more nutrients from their primary food source, potentially improving their overall health and reproductive success. Additionally, such a mutation might help koalas better tolerate the toxins present in eucalyptus, enabling them to thrive in environments where food quality varies. Overall, this kind of mutation could contribute to the koala's survival in a changing habitat.
