0
Though the basics are settled some questions still remain. One of the biggest arguments in evolution now is the argument of the exact evolutionary history of the human lineage, and its relationships to its closest relatives, past and present.
The discussion about specific phylogenies remains because the genetic evidence is, while more precise than any other line, not so accurate as to allow only one phylogeny for each assay.
Also, there remains plenty to discuss on the subjects of mechanisms. Drift, biased gene conversion, plenty other mechanisms affect evolution - but to what degree?
What else can I help you with?
Why do most scienists think about the rate of evolution?
Scientists are interested in studying the rate of evolution because it provides insights into how species have changed over time. By understanding the pace at which genetic variations accumulate in populations, researchers can better comprehend the mechanisms driving evolution and its impacts on biodiversity. The rate of evolution can also inform predictions about how species might respond to environmental changes.
Why is evolution theory not fact?
Evolution is a scientific theory that is supported by overwhelming evidence from various fields such as paleontology, genetics, and microbiology. The term "theory" in science does not mean a guess, but rather a well-substantiated explanation based on evidence. While evolution is widely accepted among scientists, it is not considered a fact in the same way as established scientific laws because theories are subject to modification based on new evidence.
Why might scientists want to obtain the DNA sequence of organisms other than humans?
Because that is how science works. Knowledge allows the building of other knowledge, and knowing how one organism's genetic structure works is important in the fields of medicine, evolution, microbiology, and pure research.
What is the importance of evolution development?
Evolutionary development helps us understand how species have adapted and changed over time to survive in changing environments. It provides insight into the history of life on Earth and helps us make predictions about how species might change in the future. Studying evolution development also has practical applications in fields like medicine, agriculture, and conservation.
What would most likely occur over time if new technologies gave us information that challenged what scientists currently understand about natural selection?
If new technologies challenge our current understanding of natural selection, scientists would likely conduct further research and experiments to validate the new information. This might lead to revisions and updates in scientific principles related to natural selection. The scientific community would engage in debates and discussions to reconcile the new findings with existing theories. Ultimately, this process would contribute to a deeper and more comprehensive understanding of evolution and natural selection.
How might the theory of evolution be used by scientists in their studies?
to explain the relationship
How can an idea held by the scientific community be rejected?
Scientists also gather at conferences to present new findings,Researchers who disagree about the data might gather discuss views.
What proof is there for human evolution?
Well scientists believe that we evolved from the Apes, think of the era of the cave men that might give you some idea of what i mean.
Why might scientist study evolution?
A scientist may study evolution in order to understand current species of organisms, and what the future of said species may be. Evolution is a direct gateway from the past to the present allowing scientists to understand everything from genetic structures - to geographic activity.
Is french kissing from France?
well..actually it depends on how you want to think of it.. some people might say yes but others might disagree.. you need to ask an expert on France history on this one..
Why might the fossil record of the early history of these species have gaps?
The lack of a clear fossil record might indicate rapid evolution or that the transitional species was not very widespread.
Why do most scienists think about the rate of evolution?
Scientists are interested in studying the rate of evolution because it provides insights into how species have changed over time. By understanding the pace at which genetic variations accumulate in populations, researchers can better comprehend the mechanisms driving evolution and its impacts on biodiversity. The rate of evolution can also inform predictions about how species might respond to environmental changes.
In which Family Guy episode do they show how the new testament was written?
Might you be referring to Kansas' alternate teaching of evolution from Untitled Griffin Family History
Is WWE a sport?
i think soyesYes, the WWE is one of the most extreme sports in USA history, others might disagree, but these athletes train more than the normal athlete does for weeks.
Is WWE sports?
i think soyesYes, the WWE is one of the most extreme sports in USA history, others might disagree, but these athletes train more than the normal athlete does for weeks.
Why might two scientists from two different hypothses based on the same observations?
An hypothesis consists of a group of propositions that collectively form an explanation for a set of observations. If the scientists disagree on the truth of one or more central propositions, they may end up with very different hypotheses to explain the same phenomena.
Why might economic advisers to the president disagree about a question of policy?
Economic Advisers to President might disagree about a question of policy because of differing scientific judgments or differences in values
