Yes it's going to be the same because no one is going to destroy it
you would expect that the populations of animals are increasing or decreasing or because of no rainfall the plants will get dried.
there well be no animal on earth
In a health ecosystem, organisms at the bottom of the food chain, such as plants and plankton, are likely to have the highest population because they form the base of the ecosystem and support higher trophic levels. Organisms at the top of the food chain, such as predators or apex predators, would have the lowest population as they typically have fewer individuals due to their position in the food web.
If an ecosystem lost all its plant species, it would disrupt the food chain as plants are primary producers. This would lead to a cascade effect, impacting herbivores, predators, and ultimately the entire ecosystem. Nutrient cycles would also be disrupted, affecting soil health and ecosystem stability.
A student would expect to find two seed leaves (cotyledons), branching veins in the leaves, flower parts in multiples of four or five, and a taproot system when examining a dicot.
After a flood, you would expect to see pioneer species, particularly fast-growing plants like grasses and certain herbaceous species, emerging first. These plants are well-adapted to disturbed soils and can quickly stabilize the area, improve soil quality, and create conditions favorable for other species. Additionally, wetland plants such as cattails and willows may also thrive in the newly saturated environment, contributing to the recovery of the ecosystem.
Only heterotrophic organisms remain after a change in the environment
Tertiary consumers receive the least amount of energy from producers.
you would expect that the populations of animals are increasing or decreasing or because of no rainfall the plants will get dried.
In an ecosystem characterized by abundant sunlight, moderate temperatures, and regular rainfall, you would likely expect a lush and diverse environment, such as a temperate rainforest or a tropical savanna. This setting would support a wide variety of plant and animal species, including trees, shrubs, and various wildlife adapted to these conditions. Additionally, the consistent rainfall would contribute to rich soil and healthy water systems, promoting biodiversity and ecological stability. Overall, such an ecosystem would be vibrant and teeming with life.
you`d expect more caterpillars than foxes because caterpillars are pregnant less and give birth earlier than foxes
It would remain the same.
We certainly hope not! If Mars were to be disturbed from its orbit to approach the Earth so closely, it would probably destroy the Earth as well. No, Mars will remain in its orbit and the Earth will remain in OUR orbit, and with any luck, the planets will never meet.
The cohesin complex will be destroyed, and the cell will remain in metaphase.
The past simple form of "disturb" is "disturbed." For example, "The loud noise disturbed my concentration."
If the ozone is disturbed, life would end on earth.
myself, i would class disturbed as heavy metal but that's just my opinion