Well according to Aborginal Dreamtime stories, the seagull was originally a giant flying dragon. This flying dragon was the king of the sky, anything that got in its way, was destroyed. But one day a crab accused the dragon of being stingy and not sharing the sky with other animals, this made the seagull very angry, an epic Pokemon battle broke out.
The dragon played with Wingull (a seagull type Pokemon) and the crab used Paras (a crab like Pokemon). They both had direct hits and one hit knockouts!! This left the dragon and crab in confusion for forty years. Eventually the dragon responded and accepted to share the sky with the other animals. So overtime the dragon devolved into a lesser creature from the flying dragon. Now a days we call it the 'seagull' it looks similar to the Pokemon, Wingull, played by there ancestor's.
How ironic.
scientist have been able to infer the relationships between the major groups of vertebrates by bones
I think this type of inference is by looking at the data, i.e., there is no real relationship between the tables (through Primary and Foreign keys), but when you analyze the data in a table you are able to infer that there is a relationship.
You're supposed to infer that there was something more than a friendship between dumbledore and grindelwald, but dumbledore has to destroy grindelwald because he is evil.
the sun warms the Earth
The writer is doing a report on the jogger. or The writer is a observing a typical jogger
reaction rate doubles with every 10 K temperature change
critical thinking and infers are bith answers.
She can infer that the rock layer with the fossil is younger than the layer without the fossil because the fossil was deposited after the formation of the rock layer. This provides a relative age relationship between the two layers.
Scientists can infer that the two structures may have a common evolutionary origin or shared biological function due to their similarities. This can provide insights into the relationship between the two structures and potentially help to understand their roles in biological processes. Comparing the structures can also help in identifying conserved features that are important for their function.
One thing you can infer is that they are able to be self-sufficient and survive in the woods, also that their relationship is strong enough that they are able to want to live alone.
Advantages over what? For what? Generally linear interpolation is done because one infers that the relationship between points is linear and/or it is the the easiest kind of interpolation. In the absence of data or theory to help you infer the relationship between points the principle of parsimony suggest that use the simplest that gets the job done - linear.
I think they're the same thing