Yes, it is because the photograph was there during the time it was happening
It is a primary source because it was taken at the time.
Yes, because it was taken at the time it happened.
Yes, a photograph of a riot can be considered a primary source as it provides direct visual evidence of the event. It captures the scene as it unfolded and can serve as an authentic record of the riot.
yes it is a primary source
It is a primary source because it was taken at the time.
A primary source might be a letter, photograph, or speech that
A source directly from an event. An autobiography, Photograph, interview YOU did, are all primary sources.
If the source is primary or secondary and what type of source it is (i.e. video, photograph, etc.)
Usually refers to a primary source such as a journal, photograph, letter, etc.
A secondary source, such as a textbook or analysis, is generally not considered a primary source.
No, a review article is not considered a primary source.
A primary source would be something like a diary, or a photograph. Primary sources are sources that came directly from the time period they are describing.