No, oxidation cannot occur without reduction occurring at the same time. This is the case since gaining electrons means another element losing due to the fact that electrons cannot be destroyed.
Oxidation is loosing electrones. E.g. an anode in a battery. The electrons lost have to reduce something, they need to end somewhere, e.g. a cathode. However by way of philosophical thinking you may send them to ground (by way of current rectifier) which is an infinite drain for electrons and assume no reduction
Generally, no. However, in electrochemical reactions driven by an externally imposed electromotive force and having a partial migration barrier between the two electrodes, it is possible to separate the oxidation and reduction reactions from one another in different compartments in space, with charge neutrality in each compartment being maintained by diffusion of some other charged entity not directly involved in the reaction.
Such substance is called an OXIDIZING AGENT. It oxidizes another substance it reacts with by displacing the Hydrogen atom present in the substance thereby gaining it and becoming REDUCED while it donates OXYGEN to the other substance,OXIDIZING it.
Yes, it is possible. Previous definitions of oxidationmeant a "reaction with oxygen". However, over time the definition became more generalized and meant the loss of electrons by substance, or an increase in the valence state/number of a substance. So for example, there is no oxygen present in the reaction of aluminum, but it is considered to be an oxidation reaction:
Al(metal) + 3 H2O + OH (-1) = (A[OH]4)(-1) + 3/2 H2
No, in order for one substance to be oxidized another must be reduced.
no
Equations that separate the oxidation from the reduction parts of the reaction
Yes, an element can undergo both oxidation and reduction in the same reaction. The reaction between Zinc and Copper Sulphate is a perfect example. This type of reaction is called a redox reaction.
Oxidation is loss of electrons. Reduction is gain of electrons.Therefore in a redox reaction one substance will lose electrons which the other picks up and gains.So the complimentary part is because in order for one substance to gain electrons another in the system must be losing them.I think that is what is meant - although it has been many years indeed!-from von2 posadas of EN 4A UE Caloocan
A catalyst doesn't undergo a chemical change during a chemical reaction.
A Catalyst.From wikipedia: "Catalysis is the process in which the rate of a chemical reaction is increased by means of a chemical substance known as a catalyst. Unlike other reagents that participate in the chemical reaction, a catalyst is not consumed by the reaction itself. The catalyst may participate in multiple chemical transformations."http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catalyst
In chemistry, reduction is considered the gaining of electrons. Oxidation is the lose of electrons. They go together in reactions called redox (reduction/oxidation). You cannot have a reduction without also having an oxidation.
Equations that separate the oxidation from the reduction parts of the reaction
In a reaction where one reactant is being oxidised another reactant is necessarily being reduced. Reduction cannot occur without oxidation, and vice versa.
Yes, an element can undergo both oxidation and reduction in the same reaction. The reaction between Zinc and Copper Sulphate is a perfect example. This type of reaction is called a redox reaction.
Reduction Half-Reaction: MnO4-(aq) → Mn2+(aq) Oxidation Half-Reaction: Cl-(aq) → Cl2(g)
reduction
o it s not possible
Redox. You can't have the re without the dox, or is that ox without the red? You can't throw away electrons, nor will electrons pop out of thin air.Oxidation is the loss of electrons, reduction is the gain of electrons. In order for one atom to lose electrons another atom must gain them. Hence, reduction must be accompanied by oxidation and vice versa.
Oxidation is loss of electrons. Reduction is gain of electrons.Therefore in a redox reaction one substance will lose electrons which the other picks up and gains.So the complimentary part is because in order for one substance to gain electrons another in the system must be losing them.I think that is what is meant - although it has been many years indeed!-from von2 posadas of EN 4A UE Caloocan
Because for oxidation to take place the electrons lost by the substance that is oxidized must be accepted by atoms or ions of another substance. Also, for reduction to occur the electrons gained by the substance that is being reduced must be transferred from the atoms of ions of another substance. Therefore, oxidation and reduction are complementary processes: that is to say that oxidation cannot occur without reduction and visa versus.
Evidence of a chemical reaction from the rusting of an iron nail is the formation of brown Iron Oxide. The oxidation of iron is a chemical reaction.Rust is iron oxide. The presence of rust indicates that the iron in the nail has oxidized, which is a chemical reaction.
Fermentation is not considered as an oxydation reaction. ------------------------------------------------------------------ It may not usually be considered as such, but the oxidation state of C in sugar is zero, and the oxidation state of C in ethanol is -2. Any change in oxidation state can be treated as a redox process. Loss of electrons (or an increase of oxidation state) is oxidation, gain of electrons (or a decrease of oxidation state) is reduction. The carbon that ends up in the ethanol has decreased its oxidation state from 0 to -2 so those atoms have undergone reduction. Reduction cannot exist without a subsequent oxidation, so something else has undergone oxidation. The fermentation process also makes carbon dioxide. The C in those molecules has an oxidation state of +4, so those atoms of carbon have been oxidized. So the answer is --- both.