No, this is because an Ion is only present when there is a loss or gain of electrons, meaning that it's only present from it being positive or negative, therefore it cannot have a neutral charge.
A neutral atom differs in charge from a positive or negative ion.
As an element oxygen is neutral, but it forms negative ions.
When ions come together, they do so in a way that balances out the charges on the ions.
The charge on the Sc ions in Sc2O3 is 3+. This can be determined by recognizing that oxide ions always have a charge of 2-, and there are three of them, so the total oxide charge is 6-. There are two scandium ions, and since the compound must be neutral, the total charge on the two scandium ions has to be 6+, so the charge on each scandium ion is 3+.
No, it is not true that a neutral ionic compound can only contain ions with identical charges. You can have, for example, a compound that consists of twice as many positive ions as negative ions, but the positive ions have only half the charge; +1 ions bonded to -2 ions. There are many different possible ratios with which different elements or radicals combine. As long as the total amount of charge adds up to zero, you still have a neutral ionic compound.
This compound is of course neutral.
Atoms that are neutral in charge have the same quantity of protons and electrons. Negative ions have extra electrons, and positive ions are missing electrons.
A "normal" atom has not an electrical charge; ions have a charge.
The atom of americium is neutral; only ions have an electrical charge.
This sum is zero, neutral.
Zero. (Ions have charge; atoms are always neutral.)
The resulting compound would be electrically neutral.
The resulting compound would be electrically neutral.
The standard atom is neutral; the ions are Po2+ and Po4+.
A neutral atom differs in charge from a positive or negative ion.
All the atoms are neutral. Only ions have an electrical charge.
by definition, ions are charged atoms. so a neutral ion doesn't exist