Yes it can. A smoke is tiny particles of solid suspended in the air, and there are many ways to produce one.
There wouldn't be one. A fire needs oxygen in the first place.
Yes, smoke is the collection of gasses and particles which escape from a material when it undergoes combustion. No fire is a type of liquid and can be found in the deep caverns of mexico. :)
Heat is typically the least dangerous element of a fire as it is the energy source that drives the combustion process. Smoke and flames pose a greater risk to health and safety due to their ability to spread rapidly and cause harm to individuals and property. Speed can also increase the danger of a fire by making it harder to control or evacuate.
Smoke goggles are used by pilots to protect their eyes from smoke, fumes, and other hazardous materials in the event of a fire or emergency situation onboard an aircraft. They help maintain visibility and reduce eye irritation, allowing the pilot to safely navigate and land the aircraft.
Fire smoke is dangerous because it contains a combination of toxic gases, such as carbon monoxide and hydrogen cyanide, along with fine particles that can penetrate deep into the lungs. Inhaling these substances can cause respiratory problems, cardiovascular issues, and even death. Additionally, fire smoke can obscure visibility, making it difficult for people to escape from a burning building.
No Smoke Without a Fire was created in 1989.
No Smoke Without Fire was created in 1978.
Where there's smoke there's fire. The earliest recorded version is from 13th century France: "No fire is without smoke, nor smoke without fire. In 1592 the English had this version: "There's no smoke without fire". Today's version is just a variant of these. What it means: if it looks like something's wrong then something is probably wrong.
Where there's smoke there's fire. The earliest recorded version is from 13th century France: "No fire is without smoke, nor smoke without fire. In 1592 the English had this version: "There's no smoke without fire". Today's version is just a variant of these. What it means: if it looks like something's wrong then something is probably wrong.
Where there's smoke there's FIRE. The earliest recorded version is from 13th century France: "No fire is without smoke, nor smoke without fire. In 1592 the English had this version: "There's no smoke without fire". Today's version is just a variant of these. What it means: if it looks like something's wrong then something is probably wrong.
start a fire
No - At somepoint a "flash" has to develop.
No, not at all. There can be heat without flame. Something can smolder and put out more smoke than something that is at a rolling fire.
There is no smoke without fire
According to experts, if possible, get below the level of the smoke, such as by crawling, and make your way to the nearest exist if one is accessible.
There is a saying that where there is smoke, there is fire. This means that if there is evidence of something happening, then it is likely that there is a fire, or cause, for it. This saying can be applied to many situations in life. For example, if there is smoke coming from a building, it is likely that there is a fire inside. If there is smoke coming from a car, it is likely that the engine is on fire. In both of these cases, the smoke is evidence of a fire, or cause.
The phrase "where there's smoke, there's fire" means that if there are signs or indications of a problem or wrongdoing, there is likely some truth to it. Just like smoke often precedes a fire, visible signs may suggest an underlying issue.