answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Ionization energies generally become larger as electrons are removed from an atom since it becomes harder and harder to remove the next electron. Ionization energies increase from left to right across the Periodic Table and decrease as you go down the periods.

Ionization will decrease sharply when an electron is removed from an atom and results in the cation obtaining a full outer shell.

For example: In the element calcium the 2nd ionization energy is greater than the second ionization energy. You can think of it this way. When you remove an electron, the nucleus is able to better hold onto the remaining electrons of the positive ion so the removing the second electron is more difficult. In calcium the 3rd ionization energy is much larger than the second. This is because the 3rd electron is being removed from the 2nd energy level instead of the 3rd energy level. The second energy level is closer to the nucleus than the third so the nucleus is even more effective at holding onto the electrons.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

Generally speaking, yes. A smaller atomic radius means valence electrons are closer to the nucleus; therefore, the Coulombic attraction between the positive nucleus and those electrons will be greater due to their proximity. The farther away a valence electron is from the nucleus, the easier it will be to ionize (remove an electron from) that atom.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

No, ionization energy increase when we move from left to right (in a period) in periodic table, because atomic size decreases and nuclear charge increases.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

Ionization energy decreases down due to increase in shielding effect.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Since the atom gets smaller, the attraction of nucleus on outermost electrons increases which makes the ionization energy higher.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

Yes, it is true.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Do ionization energies get smaller as more electrons are removed from an atom?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Chemistry

Is magnesium's ionization energy higher or lower than chlorine?

ionization energies of mg is less than chlorine because chlorine requires only one electron to complete its octet so it will not prefer to loose its electron morover its electronegativity is also higher and it is of smaller size than mg so electtron removal is difficult


Which element has a smaller ionization energy Cs or Sr?

Caesium has a smaller ionization energy (375,7 kJ/mol) than strontium (549,5 kJ/mol).


Which best explains why cations are smaller than atoms from which they are formed?

A cation has had electrons removed. So, although cations and their parent atoms have the same number of protons in the nucleus they have a different number (lower) of electrons. This means the same number of protons pulls the smaller number of electrons closer to the nucleus and so the remaining electrons are more tightly bound by the nucleus and hence the reduction in size.


Why arsenic has larger ionization potential than cesium?

Due to smaller size of arsenic


When you go down the periodic table what happens to the ionization energy and why?

As you go across a period, ionization energy tends to increase. The reason for this is that as you move across a period, the outer shell of the atom becomes more complete. Consequently, there is a larger "Z" effect (attraction between the valence electrons and the nucleus) which leads to an increased difficulty in removing electrons. It is important to note that while this trend is generally valid, there are certain exceptions.

Related questions

Is the ionization energy of alkali metals larger or smaller than the alkaline earth metals in the same period?

It is about first ionization energy. It is less than alkaline earth metals.


How does calcium's first ionization energy compare to the first ionization energy of magnesium and potassium?

First ionization energy of magnesium = 870/ kj/mol First ionization energy of phosphorous = 589 kj/mol So, magnesium has the larger ionization energy required to pull the first valance electron. Do you know why?


Why the first ionization energy for sodium is much smaller than the second ionization energy for sodium?

Ionization energy is referred to the amount of energy required to remove an electron from it's nucleus.The first ionization energy refers to the valence electron (the electron on the outer most shell)Blatantly, we can say that is requires less energy to remove valence electrons, rather than electrons in other orbitals, because it is farther away from the proton and therefore take less energy to remove that electron (ionization energy).The large discrepancy between the first and second ionization energies can be accounted for, by some of these factors:- such as shielding: basically the inner most electrons block some of the attractive forces from the nucleus (protons) and the valence electrons therefore have the most electrons blocking for them, because they are "in front" of all of the other electrons, on the outer most shell. Having this energy blocked means they are more free to move about.-Inverse square relationship between the first and Nth (n) shell: I won't write the entire equation but basically:the energy to be removed from the first shell is / by n^2, where n is the shell where the electron is removed from.Hence for the first (n=1) shellIE from 1st/ 1^2 = IE/1 = IE , this means that the energy to be removed from the first shell relative to itself is = which is true. This step is important.However, if we use the second shell (n=2), this is the second ionization energy.IE/2^2 = IE/4 , this means 4Xtimes LESS energy is needed to remove an electron from the second shell compared to the firstand then, if we use the third shell (n=3), which is the valence electron , also the FIRST Ionization energy.IE/3^2 = IE/9 , this means 9Xtimes LESS energy is needed to remove an electron from the third shell compared to the first.Conclusion: if we compare the first and second ionization energies, they are radically different from one another and there's a large discrepancy between the values due to the inverse square relationship between IE from the first energy level to the Nth level.


Is magnesium's ionization energy higher or lower than chlorine?

ionization energies of mg is less than chlorine because chlorine requires only one electron to complete its octet so it will not prefer to loose its electron morover its electronegativity is also higher and it is of smaller size than mg so electtron removal is difficult


Which element has a smaller ionization energy Cs or Sr?

Caesium has a smaller ionization energy (375,7 kJ/mol) than strontium (549,5 kJ/mol).


Which atom has the smaller ionization energy B or N?

N


What affect does electron shielding have on ionization energy?

Shielding actually reduces ionization energy. Let's look at some atomic structure and see why. Electrons form shells around an atomic nucleus. The inner electrons shells shield the outer electrons shells and reduce the affect of the nuclear "pull" on those outer electrons. The shielding provided by the inner electrons means it will take less energy to free outer electrons from their orbitals, and thus the ionization energy of an outer electron is reduced by the effects of shielding.


Why the 1st ionization energy of Na is greter than mg?

Because Be contains more protons and thus has greater nuclear positivity which exerts a stronger attraction for its electrons which requires more energy to remove one of the electrons leading to a higher ionization potential.


Why are the first ionization energies of some of the group 13 elements smaller than the first ionization energies of the nearby alkali earth metals in the same period?

I.E is the energy required to remove one electron from each atom to form gaseous charged cations.from group 2 to 12,atomic radius increases and hence there is less attraction from the protons in the atom.therefore,the energy required to remove an electron from the outermost shell will be less


Is the ionization energy of chlorine higher than that of fluorine?

In the periodic table of elements, fluorine and iodine are in the same column, but fluorine is in the second, iodine in the fifth row. That means fluorine has only nine electrons flying around in orbitals while iodine has 53 of them. Ionization is the called a process during which a single electron is abstracted - we're now talking about the 1st ionization energy, which is much higher for fluorine. Well, as it only has nine electrons scattered in the orbitals (but according laws, of course), they do not really influence the repelling - attracting actions between the positive center and the other electrons beside them. For iodine with 53 electrons, they really do interfere with the attraction of other electrons AND as the outmost electrons (which are the ones taken away by ionization) are in those orbitals which are at the biggest distance to the center - for 53 electrons the outmost orbitals is at a much bigger distance... both results in a smaller attraction of the electrions at max distance from the center... so for iodine you need less energy to perform ionization.


What is the smaller protons or electrons?

Electrons


Why does boron have a higher ionization energy than fluorine?

Because fluorine's size is lower than that of iodine, it has a greater ionization energy than iodine. Fluorine, on the other hand, appears to have a smaller shielding effect. As a result, fluorine's nucleus attracts more valence electrons than iodine's.