No. Rocks are composed of millions if not billions of molecules.
Additionally, rocks are different from minerals in that minerals are a nearly infinite repetition of the same chemical formula. Rocks are composed of diverse molecules in a relatively exact proportion.
Coal is not a molecule; it is a naturally occurring solid composed of a mixture of organic compounds, mainly carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen. These compounds are arranged in complex structures that make up the solid material of coal, rather than being individual molecules.
The one labelled "molecule A".
A group of atoms that act as a unit is called a molecule.
The molecule present in this sample is insert molecule name.
A molecule
it deposits dust and other molecule found in the rock
There's no theoretical minimum to size, except that you need to have more than a single molecule to call it a "rock". The smallest bits would thus be on the order of nanometers.
The type of fossil you are referring to is called a petrified fossil. Petrification occurs when minerals such as silica or calcite replace the organic material of the original object, transforming it into a rock-like structure while retaining its original shape and features.
This is a compound, a molecule.
C.A molecule that has a symmetrical shape will be a nonpolar molecule.
C.A molecule that has a symmetrical shape will be a nonpolar molecule.
No a molecule is a molecule, polar or nonpolar.
Coal is not a molecule; it is a naturally occurring solid composed of a mixture of organic compounds, mainly carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen. These compounds are arranged in complex structures that make up the solid material of coal, rather than being individual molecules.
lactose
H2 is how the molecule of hydrogen is presented
The one labelled "molecule A".
When a molecule loses an electron the molecule has been ionized and oxidized.