Yes, because any time something is burning, or is burnt there is a chemical change.
A forest fire would be a chemical change, this process can not be reversed. You are changing the chemistry of the wood by combustion, which is not a physical change
Forest fire is a physical change. After a few months new vegetation comes in to being in that forest area.
A fire (burning, combustion) is a chemical process.
Chemical because its made of chemicals like minerals and when the fire on the string hits the minerals then it forms a chemical reaction.
Burning coal is a chemical change. Anytime heat is released (as such in fire) it will be a chemical property change.
chemical
Forest fire is a physical change. After a few months new vegetation comes in to being in that forest area.
Firing a forest is a chemical change because you change a wood into ashes and never reverse it back again
Fire is a chemical reaction. A forest fire is a disaster consisting of chemical reactions.
A forest fire is an example of a chemical change because the heat from the fire causes the organic materials in the forest, such as trees and plants, to undergo combustion and break down into different chemical substances like carbon dioxide, water vapor, ashes, and smoke. This transformation of the original substances into new ones is a chemical change.
A fire (burning, combustion) is a chemical process.
A fire is a chemical change due to the irreversible changes that happen.
No, fire is not "alive". It is a chemical reaction.
Both Actually :)
It is a chemical change.
Burning is a chemical change.
Burning is a chemical change.
Yes