Mass is always conserved in chemical reactions. This just means that stuff can't be created or destroyed just because the atoms reorganised themselves. So if you weigh your magnesium ribbon, then burn it, then weigh it again, it will have got heavier, and the amount it has gained is the mass of oxygen you used from the air in the room in the burning. But Einstein's famous equation E=mc2 tells us how much energy we will get if we do manage to convert some mass into energy. In a nuclear reactor or in the sun a tiny amount of mass disappears and is converted into energy - if you multiply the amount of mass destroyed by the speed of light squared, you get the answer for how much energy you've made. Since the speed of light is a REALLY big number, the amount of energy is enormous.
Yes, mass is conserved in all cases expect nuclear reactions. Thus, when a substance is physically changed, such as shaped, it does not gain or lose any mass. For example, a gold bar hammered into a sheet will have the same mass as it did before being hammered.
Always. For mass to not be conserved in any instance would violate the law of conservation of matter, which (as far as we know) cannot be done. However, the ability to measure the mass of the products of a reaction is something different. In order to accomplish that, you must have a closed system. If one of your products is a gas, this may be difficult, as gases tend to diffuse, blow away, or otherwise leave the area if not carefully controlled. If the mass of your products does not equal the mass of your reactants, then you either made an error in measuring one or both masses, or you let some of your reactants or products leave the system in between measurements. It is also possible for an outside substance to enter the system that wasn't measured as a reactant, such when Oxygen bonds with Iron in the process of rusting. It's very hard to mass the Oxygen that will react and nothing else unless the system is airtight.
A small amount of mass is converted to energy.
To find how much energy,Use:-E=mc^2
False; in a nuclear reaction, some mass is converted into energy or the reverse.
This law was deduced from numerous experiments.
yes, mass is conserved.
Yes.
While overall ENERGY has to be conserved, MASS does not. In a nuclear reaction mass can be converted into energy so the mass of the products may be less than the mass of the reactants. The difference in mass is converted into energy as Einstein's equation describes (E=MC squared). In a chemical reaction MASS has to be conserved.
The mass remains conserved... while it is in case of a nuclear reaction where the total mass changes... in chemical reaction there is no change in mass...
mass
Both mass and charge
True
While overall ENERGY has to be conserved, MASS does not. In a nuclear reaction mass can be converted into energy so the mass of the products may be less than the mass of the reactants. The difference in mass is converted into energy as Einstein's equation describes (E=MC squared). In a chemical reaction MASS has to be conserved.
In order for a nuclear reaction to be balanced, there are quantities that must be conserved. The quantities are the atomic numbers and mass numbers of the particles involved in the reaction.
Yes. Basically, energy is ALWAYS conserved. The popular saying, that in a nuclear reaction mass is converted to energy, is plainly wrong, since both mass and energy are conserved. Read about "mass deficit", for example in the Wikipedia, for more details.
The mass remains conserved... while it is in case of a nuclear reaction where the total mass changes... in chemical reaction there is no change in mass...
False. Both mass and energy are conserved.
It is often stated that mass is transformed to energy. This is wrong, since both mass and energy are conserved in a chemical reaction - or in a nuclear reaction. The Wikipedia article on "binding energy" clarifies this.
mass
Both mass and charge
Sort of. That's a common explanation for what happens in a nuclear reaction. But technically, both matter and energy are conserved - there is no more or less matter after the reaction, than before the reaction. Therefore, in such cases there is no matter-to-energy conversion. Read the Wikipedia article on "Mass deficit" or "Binding energy" for a more detailed explanation. There's no sort of about it. The meaning of Einstein's equation (E = mc2) is that matter and energy are interconvertible, and this happens all the time. What is conserved is mass-energy. Mass and energy are not conserved separately.
True
ChargeThe count of nucleons
Of course !