The bond present in Sucrose is a covalent bond because sucrose is made up of Carbon, Hydrogen, and Chlorine atoms which are all non-metals that share valence electrons; therefore they bond covalently, so that each atom will achieve a noble-gas configuration.
covalent. It's a dissacharide made of one glucose molecule and one fructose molecule joined via a glycosidic bond
It is ionic
No, table sugar (sucrose) is a covalent compound, not an ionic substance. It is composed of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen atoms held together by covalent bonds.
Br2 is a covalent compound. It consists of two bromine atoms sharing electrons to form a covalent bond.
The bond in LiBr is primarily ionic, not covalent. Lithium donates an electron to bromine, forming an ionic bond.
covalent. It's a dissacharide made of one glucose molecule and one fructose molecule joined via a glycosidic bond
covalent
NO is covalent.
NO is covalent.
It is ionic
The bond is covalent.
The covalent bond is weaker.
No, it is ionic
The F-F bond (in F2) is covalent, and non polar covalent at that.
nope
No, but the bond in sodium chloride is covalent.
The bond is covalent. If the bond is made by transferring electrons then it is an ionic bond, but if they are sharing the it is covalent.