It depends on the context in which they are being compared. Wood is a renewable resource and produces less pollution when burned compared to coal. However, coal generates more energy per unit of weight than wood.
Coal typically burns longer than wood because it has a higher energy density. This means that coal generates more heat and energy per unit of weight compared to wood, allowing it to sustain a fire for a longer period.
Coal burns hotter than wood because it has a higher carbon content and produces more heat when burned.
Yes, coal produces more energy than wood when burned. Coal is more carbon-dense and has a higher energy content compared to wood. This is why coal has been traditionally favored as a fuel source for power generation and industrial processes.
Yes, coal generally burns hotter than wood because it has a higher carbon content and burns more efficiently due to its denser composition. This makes coal a more efficient and hotter-burning fuel source compared to wood.
Because coal is more compact than wood (it is compressed wood plus organic oils essentially) so has more combustible material in a denser form. This reduces the flame fronts accessability to oxygen.
Coal typically burns longer than wood because it has a higher energy density. This means that coal generates more heat and energy per unit of weight compared to wood, allowing it to sustain a fire for a longer period.
Usually coal is a more appealing fuel source than wood. It, for one thing, burns MUCH faster then wood does. Also, it is cheaper, and more abundant. So overall, i believe that coal is your answer.But coal is a fossil fuel which takes atleast thousands of years ti form where as wood comes in 10 years of minimum
Coal burns hotter than wood because it has a higher carbon content and produces more heat when burned.
It can be and can't be. It really depends on what sort of wood.
Yes, coal produces more energy than wood when burned. Coal is more carbon-dense and has a higher energy content compared to wood. This is why coal has been traditionally favored as a fuel source for power generation and industrial processes.
Yes, the hardness of a material is a physical property. Wood is softer than coal, meaning it has a lower hardness and can be easily scratched or dented compared to coal.
Yes, coal generally burns hotter than wood because it has a higher carbon content and burns more efficiently due to its denser composition. This makes coal a more efficient and hotter-burning fuel source compared to wood.
Between coal and wood, both are fairly effective. For more consistent cooking temperature, and for a higher heat, the coal would be a better choice. If you're not interesting in the smoky flavor, go for the wood.
Is cols better than cola? did you mean: coal?did you mean: coal?i wouldn't recomend eating coal on a diet. And coal is not better than coal. Sorry. Coca-Cola isn't as good as Dr.Pepper
Because coal is more compact than wood (it is compressed wood plus organic oils essentially) so has more combustible material in a denser form. This reduces the flame fronts accessability to oxygen.
Burning wood is generally considered more environmentally friendly than burning coal because wood is a renewable resource and releases fewer harmful emissions when burned. However, both coal and wood burning can contribute to air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, so it's best to minimize the use of either and explore more sustainable alternatives for heating and energy production.
Coal IS a fossil fuel