answersLogoWhite

0

Eli Whitney

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Chemistry

What is the importance of using a standardized solution in titration experiments?

Using a standardized solution in titration experiments is important because it ensures accuracy and consistency in the results. Standardized solutions have known concentrations, which allows for precise measurements and reliable data analysis. This helps to minimize errors and improve the reliability of the experimental findings.


Conclusion of preparation of solution of HCl and NaOH to be standardized?

In the preparation of a solution of HCl and NaOH to be standardized, it is crucial to accurately measure the quantities of the reagents and ensure their purity. The solutions should be mixed thoroughly to ensure homogeneity, and the final solution can then be standardized using a primary standard such as potassium hydrogen phthalate (KHP) for acid or sodium carbonate for base. Conducting titrations afterward with the standardized solution will help determine the exact concentrations of the initial solutions.


Who put all the television parts together?

Television parts are put together by factory workers on assembly lines in manufacturing plants. Each worker is responsible for a specific part of the assembly process, such as attaching components, wiring, or testing the final product.


Why does NaOH need to be standardized?

NaOH, or sodium hydroxide, needs to be standardized because its concentration can vary due to factors like impurities or degradation over time. Standardization ensures accurate and consistent results when using NaOH in experiments or processes.


Which part or parts of an atom are responsible for bonding with other atoms?

Bonding between atoms occurs at the valence electron level. Core electrons and the atomic nucleus are unaffected.

Related Questions

Parts so uniform they can be substituted interchangeably are called?

standardized parts


Did Ford's system of standardized parts made parts so identical they could be easily substituted?

YES


Who invented the standardized parts?

The concept of standardized parts was first introduced by Eli Whitney in the late 18th century. Whitney promoted the use of interchangeable parts in manufacturing, which ultimately led to the development of mass production techniques.


What Eli whiteny made?

The Cotton Gin and Standardized parts for Rifles and other machines.


Factory production was greatly improved by standardized parts and assembly line production?

True(OW)


Which is the American car manufacturer to first mass produce cars with standardized car parts?

Ford produced the Model "T" on an assembly line in 1908. Oldsmobile produced the "Curved Dash" Olds from 1901 to 1904 with standardized parts using an assembly line.


Who is responsible for repairing rifle parts and replacing parts in the army?

The armourer.


Which governments are responsible for creating cities and counties?

Local governments are responsible for creating cities and counties.


What is standardized manufacturing?

Meaning everything is standardized, it's made to be more efficient by using the same process and tools to produce parts. You could think of it as being the opposite of customized manufacturing.. Hope this helps!


Who use the first standardized system of measurement?

The French and Germans used the first standardized system of measurement.


What parts of the birds is responsible for flying?

its wings!


Did various kinds of currency inhibit trade in rome during the height of rome?

No, not in the least. In the Roman empire itself the money was standardized. When dealing with foreign currency, the Romans had bankers or money changers called "argtentari". These men were responsible for the exchange of coins among other things.No, not in the least. In the Roman empire itself the money was standardized. When dealing with foreign currency, the Romans had bankers or money changers called "argtentari". These men were responsible for the exchange of coins among other things.No, not in the least. In the Roman empire itself the money was standardized. When dealing with foreign currency, the Romans had bankers or money changers called "argtentari". These men were responsible for the exchange of coins among other things.No, not in the least. In the Roman empire itself the money was standardized. When dealing with foreign currency, the Romans had bankers or money changers called "argtentari". These men were responsible for the exchange of coins among other things.No, not in the least. In the Roman empire itself the money was standardized. When dealing with foreign currency, the Romans had bankers or money changers called "argtentari". These men were responsible for the exchange of coins among other things.No, not in the least. In the Roman empire itself the money was standardized. When dealing with foreign currency, the Romans had bankers or money changers called "argtentari". These men were responsible for the exchange of coins among other things.No, not in the least. In the Roman empire itself the money was standardized. When dealing with foreign currency, the Romans had bankers or money changers called "argtentari". These men were responsible for the exchange of coins among other things.No, not in the least. In the Roman empire itself the money was standardized. When dealing with foreign currency, the Romans had bankers or money changers called "argtentari". These men were responsible for the exchange of coins among other things.No, not in the least. In the Roman empire itself the money was standardized. When dealing with foreign currency, the Romans had bankers or money changers called "argtentari". These men were responsible for the exchange of coins among other things.