An example is group 2 of the Periodic Table: CaF2, MgCl2, SrCl2 etc.
Yes, iron and chlorine would form an ionic compound. Iron, a metal, would lose electrons to form Fe^2+ ions, while chlorine, a non-metal, would gain electrons to form Cl^- ions. These oppositely charged ions would then attract each other to form an ionic compound, likely iron (II) chloride with the formula FeCl2.
No, silver and copper would not form an ionic compound as they are both transition metals and tend to form metallic bonds rather than ionic bonds. Instead, they would likely form an alloy when combined.
The formula for the ionic compound formed between silver (Ag) and the phosphate ion (P3-) would be Ag3PO4. This is because the charges of the ions must balance to form a neutral compound.
Silicon and nitrogen typically do not form an ionic compound as both elements are nonmetals and tend to share electrons to form covalent bonds. In this case, they are more likely to form covalent compounds rather than an ionic compound.
No, Mn and Cl would likely not form a covalent compound. Manganese (Mn) typically forms ionic compounds, while chlorine (Cl) is a highly electronegative element that typically forms ionic compounds as well. Therefore, they would most likely form an ionic compound rather than a covalent one.
Yes, iron and chlorine would form an ionic compound. Iron, a metal, would lose electrons to form Fe^2+ ions, while chlorine, a non-metal, would gain electrons to form Cl^- ions. These oppositely charged ions would then attract each other to form an ionic compound, likely iron (II) chloride with the formula FeCl2.
Krypton is the noble gas most likely to form a compound with fluorine, typically by reacting to form krypton difluoride (KrF2).
Carbon and fluorine would most likely form a compound called carbon tetrafluoride (CF4). This compound consists of one carbon atom bonded to four fluorine atoms through single covalent bonds.
The empirical formula for the compound between x and y would be xy. Since x is in group 2a and y is in group 7a, their charges would be 2+ and 7-, respectively. To balance the charges, one x would combine with three y to form the compound with the formula XY3.
No, silver and copper would not form an ionic compound as they are both transition metals and tend to form metallic bonds rather than ionic bonds. Instead, they would likely form an alloy when combined.
The name of the compound is: Rubidium bromide The Chemical formula is: RbBr
The formula for the ionic compound formed between silver (Ag) and the phosphate ion (P3-) would be Ag3PO4. This is because the charges of the ions must balance to form a neutral compound.
Silicon and nitrogen typically do not form an ionic compound as both elements are nonmetals and tend to share electrons to form covalent bonds. In this case, they are more likely to form covalent compounds rather than an ionic compound.
No, Mn and Cl would likely not form a covalent compound. Manganese (Mn) typically forms ionic compounds, while chlorine (Cl) is a highly electronegative element that typically forms ionic compounds as well. Therefore, they would most likely form an ionic compound rather than a covalent one.
No, magnesium and sulfur would not form an ionic compound because they are both nonmetals. Ionic compounds are formed between a metal and a nonmetal. Magnesium and sulfur would likely form a covalent compound instead.
The formula of the compound formed from the ions M1+ and X1- would be MX. The charges must balance to give a neutral compound, so one cation and one anion are needed to form a stable ionic compound.
CaPo is the chemical formula of calcium polonide.