Dalton never acknowledged the fact that the atomic structure consisted of protons nor electrons. Dalton's theory suggested:
unlike Thomson who came up with the theory of the 'Plum Pudding Model', which consisted of a positive proton with electrons 'scattered' through it, like "...currants in a Christmas pudding..."
hope this was somewhat helpful :)
Dalton's atomic theory postulated that atoms were indivisible. JJ Thomson's model showed that atoms were divisible into negatively charged electrons.
John Dalton is not author of a model of the atom.
protons,neutrons and electrons are the sub atomic particles
John Dalton is best known for work on atomic theory. While his models were very similar to the speculation of the Greeks made centuries before, his theory differentiated in the idea that chemical combination takes place between particles of different weights.
Thomson's experiments with cathode ray tubes helped him to discover the electron (which Dalton did not know about). Dalton thought that atoms were in.
JJ Thomson's discovery of electrons indicated that atoms were not indivisible.
he knew that it had protons and neutrons and electrons but he thaught the charges where the wrong way round
thomas discovered that the atom contained smaller particals called electrons
plum pudding
Thomsons model (plum pudding model of negatively charged particles in a positive soup) differed from Daltons model. Dalton hypothesised that atoms were indivisible, the word atom comes from the Greek atomos cannot be cut)
What are the similarities and differences between the Hoyt and Burgess
It was commonly described as a Solid sphere
distinguish between qualitative and quantitative model
hostilic view
The idea that atoms are indivisible.
When made.
None,they are one and the same firearm.
see along time ago before dinosaurs walked the earth. the end.
the differences between the modern model of hydrogen and bohr's model is that the modern version is much more advanced in what is known about the model, but bohr's model is very basic