Some disadvantages of using Nanotechnology in cancer treatment include potential toxicity of the nanoparticles, difficulty in targeting specific cancer cells, and challenges in scaling up production for widespread use. Additionally, long-term effects of nanoparticle accumulation in the body are not yet fully understood.
Some potential disadvantages of using nanotechnology in dentistry include concerns about nanoparticle toxicity, limited research on long-term effects, and the high cost of implementing nanotechnology-based treatments. Additionally, there may be regulatory challenges related to the use of nanomaterials in dental products.
theres no such thing as chemo cancer but chemo (chemotherepy) is a treatment for cancer
The treatment of cancer using cobalt-60 was pioneered by Canadian physician Dr. Harold E. Johns in the 1950s. Cobalt-60 is a radioactive isotope of cobalt that emits high-energy gamma rays, which can be used to target and destroy cancerous cells. Dr. Johns and his team at the University of Saskatchewan developed the first cobalt-60 therapy unit, revolutionizing cancer treatment worldwide.
Nanotechnology can be used for air purification by developing nanomaterials like nanoparticles or nanofibers that can trap and remove contaminants from the air, such as particulate matter, VOCs, and gases. Nanotechnology can also be used to create catalytic materials that can break down pollutants into harmless substances through chemical reactions. Additionally, nanotechnology can enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of filtration systems by increasing surface area and improving the capture of pollutants.
Recent successful medical trials of a cancer treatment involving the use of "nanotechnology" may open up important new avenues for the diagnosis and treatment of other cancers and diseases. Nanotechnology is a broad term covering the building of structures and "machines" on an atomic or molecular scale-in the range from 1 to 100 nanometres. A nanometre is one billionth of a metre or about the size of 10 hydrogen atoms. The techniques range from various chemical and biological processes used to "construct" structures-in some cases atom by atom-to the etching methods used to produce computer chips. The field of nanotechnology has over the last decade or so been surrounded by considerable hype. Some of the visions of what is possible in medicine conjure up the Science Fiction classic film Fantastic Voyage where tiny submarine ships were injected into the body and travelled through the bloodstream to eradicate foreign bodies. The reality is more prosaic, but the potential is nonetheless exciting. Many of the standard radiation and drug therapies now used to treat cancers can have serious side effects. The use of radiation and chemicals to kill fast-growing tumour cells inevitably affects and kills other cells in the body. Nanotechnology offers the possibility of far more precisely localising the treatment and thus minimising the damage to healthy tissue. In early April, the nanotechnology company pSivida announced the very promising results of the Phase 2 clinical trials of its product "BrachySil" for patients with liver cancer. BrachySil is a tiny structure about one-millionth of a metre in size and made up of modified particles of silicon impregnated with the radioactive isotope of phosphorus 32P. Unlike other radiation treatments that involve focussing beams of radiation on tumours, BrachySil is injected directly into the cancer using a fine gauge needle. By using 32P, the radiation is limited to a range of just 8 millimetres, resulting in the killing of tumour cells rather than healthy tissue. For several years, doctors have been using a similar technique known as brachytherapy-injecting radioisotopes directly into tumours. The difficulty was that the injected material would not remain in the cancer, but would over time be carried to other parts of the body. The advantage of BrachySil is that its silicon structures, while small, prevent the radioisotope from leaking away. The result is that the dose of radiation is focussed very precisely on the tumour itself. The silicon eventually breaks down and is excreted. 32P, which has a half-life of 14 days, eventually decomposes to stable isotopes or is excreted. Because the treatment is localised, the side effects are likely to be less than other forms of brachytherapy. None have been observed to date, although the long-term impact of the treatment is not known. BrachySil consists of tiny pockets made up of silicon microparticles. The pores or holes in the silicon pocket are the size of about 10 atoms. Radioactive phosphorus is bombarded into the structure. Because of its method of delivery of radiation doses, the treatment may well be applicable to a broader range of cancers than other forms of brachytherapy, which is currently limited to prostate and liver cancers. The clinical trial of BrachySil was undertaken at the Singapore General Hospital beginning in mid-2004. It involved eight patients suffering from primary liver cancer (where the tumours have not spread to a secondary site). They were given CT scans before and after the injection of BrachySil to determine the impact on the tumours and were monitored for possible side effects. After 12 weeks of the treatment, smaller tumours were completely eradicated. The most extraordinary finding, however, was that all tumours were reduced by an average of 80 percent-a result not seen in other treatments. After the trial results were announced, the company received a flood of inquiries and was forced to announce on its website that testing was still in its early stages. Worldwide, liver cancer is not one of the most prevalent cancers. Nevertheless, more than half a million new cases are diagnosed every year-some 45 percent of them in China. Causes of liver cancer include infection by parasites such as the Chinese liver fluke. Liver cancer can also be related to hepatitis, exposure to radiation and to the irritant Polyvinyl Chloride.
Several hospitals and research institutions are utilizing nanotechnology to treat cancer, including the MD Anderson Cancer Center in Texas, which is exploring nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems. The Mayo Clinic is also incorporating nanotechnology in its cancer treatments, focusing on targeted therapies and imaging techniques. Additionally, the Johns Hopkins Hospital is involved in research on nanomedicine for cancer diagnosis and treatment. These institutions are at the forefront of integrating nanotechnology into oncology, aiming to improve efficacy and reduce side effects.
Some potential disadvantages of using nanotechnology in dentistry include concerns about nanoparticle toxicity, limited research on long-term effects, and the high cost of implementing nanotechnology-based treatments. Additionally, there may be regulatory challenges related to the use of nanomaterials in dental products.
There have been some recent accomplishments in cancer research using nanotechnology. These projects are discusses at the website for the National Cancer Institute.
It is called chemotherapy.
theres no such thing as chemo cancer but chemo (chemotherepy) is a treatment for cancer
Antibiotic Therapy.
By using a fridge
any advantages and disadvantages of using surgeries to remove skin cancer and the ethical/social/economical and environmental implication
Definitive cancer therapy is a treatment plan designed to potentially cure cancer using one or a combination of interventions including surgery, radiation, chemical agents, or biological therapies.
Resonant frequency therapy devices may potentially benefit cancer treatment by targeting cancer cells specifically, reducing side effects compared to traditional treatments, and potentially enhancing the body's immune response against cancer.
they can make only their own type of cell. They are not pluripotent.
hard to make them reproducibly at this point