Good for whom? The people using them might find them more useful to terrorise their enemies than are conventional weapons. They kill people but cause less physical damage to property than other weapons and are more easily created and less expensive than nuclear weapons.
The people being attacked by chemical weapons are often civilians who will experience no good from the use of these weapons, except the possible reactions of those appalled by their use.
The UN has established treaties and conventions such as the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, the Chemical Weapons Convention, and the Biological Weapons Convention to limit the spread and use of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons. It also conducts inspections and monitoring programs to ensure compliance with these agreements and works with member states to strengthen their non-proliferation efforts.
Nations may want to retain or develop an arsenal of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons for deterrent purposes to dissuade potential adversaries from attacking. Additionally, they may see these weapons as a means to protect their national interests and security in a world where other countries possess such weapons. Lastly, some countries may view these weapons as a way to maintain a position of strength and influence in global politics.
Chemical weapons in World War 1 caused immense suffering, including blindness, burns, and respiratory issues. They led to a new level of brutality in warfare and prompted the development of international agreements to ban their use. The long-term effects of exposure to these weapons also contributed to health issues for many soldiers after the war.
i think using chemical weapons in war is not the best idea in the world but if that is all we have to use then i guess we will use it. but i also think that creating a way to kill our enemies without our weapons hurting our soldiers sould be made.
Fritz Haber was a German chemist known for his work in the development of chemical weapons during World War I and for his development of the Haber-Bosch process for creating ammonia. He won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1918 for his contributions to the synthesis of ammonia. However, his legacy is controversial due to his involvement in the use of chemical weapons.
Chemical weapons, chemical weapons, and more chemical weapons
Biological weapons involve living things, such as germs. Mercury is a chemical, not a biological. Bio weapons might include the diseases of anthrax, plague, typhus, Ebola, etc.
they have 500,000,000 chemical weapons ............. well so far
Biochemical Warfare is war using weapons of a biological or chemical nature. such as biotoxins. Anthrax bombs are a good example of bichemical weapons. To use weapons of mass distruction.
Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons was created in 1997.
The budget of Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons is 74,000,000 euros.
Very probable Al-Qaeda don't use chemical weapons.
Yes, the United Nations sent a team to Syria to get the chemical weapons.
Th Chemical Weapons Convention was ratified by Morocco at 29.04.1997.
Nuclear weapons, Biological Weapons, Chemical Weapons.
One may not buy any form of chemical weapons through any legal channels. Only a government's military operations may possess chemical weapons legally.
Chemical weapons are very dangerous and can destroy also the environmement; USA used chemical weapons in all the wars (Vietnam, Serbia, Irak, Afghanistan, etc.).