an atom has hardly any empty space
*********************2nd Opinion***************
Just the opposite. An atom is almost entirely empty space.
The conclusion based on the gold foil experiment is that atoms have a dense, positively charged nucleus at the center, with electrons orbiting around it in a mostly empty space. This led to the development of the nuclear model of the atom by Ernest Rutherford.
The Rutherford scattering experiment showed that atoms have a tiny, positively charged nucleus at their center surrounded by mostly empty space. This experiment led to the discovery of the atomic nucleus and helped establish the model of the atom as mostly empty with a dense nucleus at its core.
The gold foil experiment led to the conclusion that atoms have a small, positively charged nucleus at their center, with electrons orbiting around it in empty space. This discovery contributed to the development of the nuclear model of the atom by Ernest Rutherford.
Ernest Rutherford's gold foil experiment demonstrated that atoms have a small, dense nucleus at their center that contains positively charged protons. This nucleus is surrounded by mostly empty space where negatively charged electrons are found orbiting. This experiment led to the development of the nuclear model of the atom.
Ernest Rutherford, a New Zealand-born physicist, conducted the gold foil experiment in the early 20th century. This experiment involved shooting alpha particles at a thin gold foil and observing their scattering patterns. Rutherford's observations led to the conclusion that atoms have a dense, positively-charged nucleus at their center, which eventually formed the basis of the modern atomic model.
The conclusion based on the gold foil experiment is that atoms have a dense, positively charged nucleus at the center, with electrons orbiting around it in a mostly empty space. This led to the development of the nuclear model of the atom by Ernest Rutherford.
Start with a general principle or premise. Apply the principle to a specific case or situation. Draw a conclusion based on the application of the principle to the specific case. Assess the validity of the conclusion based on the initial premise.
Aristotle's model of proof, known as the syllogism, consists of a major premise, a minor premise, and a conclusion. This deductive reasoning process is used to establish the validity of an argument based on the relationship between the premises and the conclusion. In essence, it involves drawing a conclusion from two given statements.
Rutherford concluded that an atom has a small, dense, positively charged nucleus surrounded by mostly empty space where electrons orbit. This model later became known as the planetary model of the atom.
test your hypothesis.
A model is to show something and it does not have a control group, like a experiment.
It is a model.
The conclusion was that the nucleus of an atom is small, dense, and positively charged, as most of the alpha particles passed through the gold foil with a minor deflection, indicating that the majority of the atom is empty space. This led to the development of the nuclear model of the atom.
The results of this experiment led to the model of the atom called "Rutherford's model", rather than Thomson's model, which it basically disproved. Some of the alpha particles were deflected in ways that suggested to Rutherford that most of the atom's mass was concentrated in a positively charged "nucleus".
The Rutherford scattering experiment showed that atoms have a tiny, positively charged nucleus at their center surrounded by mostly empty space. This experiment led to the discovery of the atomic nucleus and helped establish the model of the atom as mostly empty with a dense nucleus at its core.
They are both estimates of the probability of outcomes that are of interest. Experimental probabilities are derived by repeating the experiment a large number of times to arrive at these estimates whereas theoretical probabilities are estimates based on a mathematical model based on some assumptions.
A scientific model is a theoretical explanation of some phenomenon; the model is the conclusion, it is not the steps by which the conclusion was reached. The sequence of reasoning would just be called a scientific argument.