The energy in one photon of any electromagnetic radiation is directly proportional
to its frequency, so that would be inversely proportional to its wavelength.
Note: There is no energy in the protons of light, since light has no protons.
A chemical bond is an energy relationship between outer electrons and neighboring atoms.
they both cant be renewed
First, consider the relationship between wavelength and energy and reformulate the premise in terms of energy. Then, study fluorescence, the process in which a molecule absorbs a photon and releases a subsequent photon at a longer wavelength. In fluorescence, energy must be conserved. The total energy absorbed must be equal to the total energy released by the excited molecule (sensitizer). The question is asking, for example, if a sensitizer absorbs a photon with energy of 3 eV and releases a photon of 2.5 eV, where did the missing 0.5 eV go? This question comes directly from the laboratory manual for the introductory chemistry courses at the University of Alabama. For those students attempting to find an easy answer without putting forth any effort, i.e. cheat, you'll have to look elsewhere. - Mr. E.
Chemical bonds create energy in the body.
Maxwell Plank found a direct relationship between the energy of a photon and its freq. This relationship can be expressed as E=h*f, where E is energy, h is Plank's constant and f is frequency. For more info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck\'s_constant wtf -.-
The energy in one photon of any electromagnetic radiation is directly proportionalto its frequency, so that would be inversely proportional to its wavelength.Note: There is no energy in the protons of light, since light has no protons.
Wavelength and frequency are inversely proportional.
inversely related
Energy E and wavelength w are related by a constant ,Ew= hc = .2E-24 Joule -meter.
The shorter the wavelength of a wave, the higher its energy.
Frequency is inversely proportional to wavelength (higher frequency means a shorter wavelength). Frequency is directly proportional to the energy of the wave (higher frequencies correspond to higher energies).
A high energy light will have a shorter wavelength than a low energy light. If the wavelength goes down, then the frequency goes up. When calculating energy in the equation, E=hv, frequency (v) is the variable, not the wavelength. So in the equation, if you wanted a more energy (E), you would have the frequency be large. For the frequency to be big, then the wavelength has to be low.
The energy per photon is directly proportional to the frequency; the frequency is inversely proportional to the wavelength (since frequency x wavelength = speed of light, which is constant); thus, the energy per photon is inversely proportional to the wavelength.
Ok, so this goes back to the inverse relationship between wavelength and frequency ( energy). As wavelength increases , frequency decreases, the relationship between the two is a inverse relationship. the Red light, wavelength of approx. 700 m^-7 , has a greater wavelength then of the blue light, 400m ^-7. This means , due to frequency and wavelength having an inverse relationship, blue light has a greater frequency (energy) than red light. This is why blue light, no matter how dim, will impart more energy to an electron , then a red light would.
The energy is E=hf = hc/w where f is frequency, c is the velocity and w is the wavelength.
it is a classical theory which gives us the relationship between energy and no. of vibrating particles and temperature,frequency and wavelength.
They are inversely proportional. The shorter the wavelength, the higher the energy and vice versa. v=frequency; c=speed of light (~3x10^8 m/s); y=wavelength E=hv; v=c/y E=hc/y