The most obvious difference is that covalent bondingoccurs between non-metals, whereas ionic bondingoccurs between a metal and a non-metal.
Covalent bonding is also a bonding process which shares electrons, whereas ionic bonding is a bonding process in which electrons are transferred. This would therefore also affect the way in which you draw dot and cross diagrams for a covalent compound versus an ionic compound.
It is ionic
The kind of bond that results when electron transfer occurs between atoms of two different elements can be considered covalent, polar covalent, or ionic. The type of bond will depend upon the identities of the elements and their electronegativity's.
Br2 is a covalent compound. It consists of two bromine atoms sharing electrons to form a covalent bond.
The bond in LiBr is primarily ionic, not covalent. Lithium donates an electron to bromine, forming an ionic bond.
The opposite of an ionic bond is a covalent bond. In an ionic bond, electrons are transferred from one atom to another, while in a covalent bond, electrons are shared between atoms.
ionic bond conects a nonmetal and a metal. covalent bond connects a nonmetal and another nonmetal.
covalent
NO is covalent.
NO is covalent.
ionic transfers electrons, coavlent shares electrons and ionic has a metal and a nonmetal while covalent has 2 nonmetals
It is ionic
The kind of bond that results when electron transfer occurs between atoms of two different elements can be considered covalent, polar covalent, or ionic. The type of bond will depend upon the identities of the elements and their electronegativity's.
The bond is covalent.
The covalent bond is weaker.
dude that makes no sense
No, it is ionic
The F-F bond (in F2) is covalent, and non polar covalent at that.