Huh? I don't think that there is an oxide produced. Fire is a rapid oxidation of a fuel though. The only things that are produced are heat, light, and unburned products of incomplete combustion (IE: smoke).
Ashes to ashes and dust to dust! Or, The wood was burned until there was nothing left but ashes.
Yes, ashes are flammable because they are the residue left behind after a material has been burned.
Rice is made out of many carbohydrates. Therefore, in combustion, a residue of amorphous carbon is left.
The parts of the tree that burn are undergoing a chemical change. The ashes remaining may or may not have undergone a chemical change, depending on the the chemical bonding that the atoms in the ash had before the tree was burned.
Ashes are primarily solid, composed of the residue left behind after burning a material such as wood or paper. However, they may also contain some volatile gases and small liquid droplets depending on the composition of the material being burned.
A forest burn will provide ashes that are rich in minerals to support the grasses that will soon grow there.
No, his body was burned and its ashes was thrown in the Elbe river in Germany.
Ashes to ashes and dust to dust! Or, The wood was burned until there was nothing left but ashes.
Yes, ashes are flammable because they are the residue left behind after a material has been burned.
After her charred body was pulled from the ashes, it was burned two additional times. They then tossed the remaining ashes rather unceremoniously into the Seine river- so no relics survived.
Her charred body as pulled from the ashes and burned two additional times and the ashes thrown into the Seine River so that no relics remained.
tiny black pieces you see after something is burned
they burned them and baried their ashes
Yes, ashes do not burn completely because they are the residue left behind after a material has been burned.
Yes, because of the ashes.
I dont know...HOPE I HELPED:)
Aztec kings were burned to ashes, not buried.