0
What else can I help you with?
What other words can you make out of the word evaporation?
Ovarian Poet Aviator Open Aviator Peon Aviator Nope Aviator Pone Atropine Ova Pear Ovation Reap Ovation Rape Ovation Pare Ovation Pave Oration A Native Poor A Naive Troop A Vitae Porno A Rave Potion A Rave Option A Aver Potion A Aver Option A Ovation Rep A Ovation Per A Piano Voter A Piano Trove A Piano Overt A Iota Proven A Patroon Vie A Ova Protein A Ova Pointer Area Vino Pot Area Vino Opt Area Vino Top Area Pivot On Area Pivot No Avian Ope Tor Avian Ope Rot Avian Rope To Avian Pore To Avian Poet Or Avian Ore Pot Avian Ore Opt Avian Ore Top Avian Roe Pot Avian Roe Opt Avian Roe Top Avian Rote Op Avian Tore Op Avian Toe Pro Avian Rep Too Avian Per Too Aviator En Op Aria Oven Pot Aria Oven Opt Aria Oven Top Tiara Oven Op Atria Oven Op Aorta Nevi Op Aorta Vein Op Aorta Vine Op Aorta Oven Pi Para Nevi Too Para Vein Too Para Vine Too Para Vie Onto Para Toe Vino Para Veto Ion Para Vote Ion Rapine Ova To Panier Ova To Pantie Ova Or Retain Ova Op Retina Ova Op Naiver Oat Op Naiver Pa Too Vainer Oat Op Vainer Pa Too Ravine Oat Op Ravine Pa Too Native Oar Op Naive Atop Or Naive Oar Pot Naive Oar Opt Naive Oar Top Naive Taro Op Naive Oat Pro Naive Pa Root Naive Rap Too Naive Par Too Naive At Poor Opiate Van Or Pirate Ova On Pirate Ova No Irate Nova Op Vitae An Poor Vitae Roan Op Nae Vita Poor Nae Via Troop Nae Oar Pivot Aeon Vita Pro Aeon Via Port Aeon Vapor It Aeon Vapor Ti Aeon Ova Trip Protean Ova I Ornate Via Op Ornate Ova Pi Atone Via Pro Atone Vapor I Atone Ova Rip Oaten Via Pro Oaten Vapor I Oaten Ova Rip Novae Pair To Novae Pita Or Novae Air Pot Novae Air Opt Novae Air Top Novae Oar Tip Novae Oar Pit Novae Taro Pi Novae Oat Rip Novae Pa Tiro Novae Pa Riot Novae Pa Trio Novae Rat Poi Novae Art Poi Novae Tar Poi Pane Via Root Pane Ova Tiro Pane Ova Riot Pane Ova Trio Nape Via Root Nape Ova Tiro Nape Ova Riot Nape Ova Trio Neap Via Root Neap Ova Tiro Neap Ova Riot Neap Ova Trio Raven Iota Op Raven Oat Poi Ante Via Poor Neat Via Poor Nave Patio Or Nave Ratio Op Nave Iota Pro Nave Pair Too Nave Taro Poi Vane Patio Or Vane Ratio Op Vane Iota Pro Vane Pair Too Vane Taro Poi Opera Vain To Opera Vita On Opera Vita No Opera Via Ton Opera Via Not Opera Nova It Opera Nova Ti Opera Ova Tin Opera Ova Nit Opera At Vino Opera Vat Ion Orate Vain Op Orate Nova Pi Orate Van Poi Orate Ova Pin Orate Ova Nip Orate Pa Vino Ovate Ani Pro Ovate Pain Or Ovate Rain Op Ovate Rani Op Ovate Pair On Ovate Pair No Ovate Apron I Ovate Roan Pi Ovate Ran Poi Ovate Oar Pin Ovate Oar Nip Ovate Pa Iron Ovate Rap Ion Ovate Par Ion Ape Vain Root Ape Nova Tiro Ape Nova Riot Ape Nova Trio Ape Taro Vino Ape Ova Intro Pea Vain Root Pea Nova Tiro Pea Nova Riot Pea Nova Trio Pea Taro Vino Pea Ova Intro Pear Vain Too Pear Via Onto Pear Oat Vino Pear Ova Into Reap Vain Too Reap Via Onto Reap Oat Vino Reap Ova Into Rape Vain Too Rape Via Onto Rape Oat Vino Rape Ova Into Pare Vain Too Pare Via Onto Pare Oat Vino Pare Ova Into Taper Ova Ion Prate Ova Ion Apter Ova Ion Peat Oar Vino Peat Ova Iron Pate Oar Vino Pate Ova Iron Tape Oar Vino Tape Ova Iron Pave Ani Root Pave Rain Too Pave Rani Too Pave Ratio On Pave Ratio No Pave Iota Nor Pave Air Onto Pave Oar Into Pave Taro Ion Pave Oat Iron Ear Atop Vino Ear Ova Pinto Ear Ova Piton Ear Ova Point Era Atop Vino Era Ova Pinto Era Ova Piton Era Ova Point Are Atop Vino Are Ova Pinto Are Ova Piton Are Ova Point Tear Nova Poi Rate Nova Poi Tare Nova Poi Rave Piano To Rave Pain Too Rave Patio On Rave Patio No Rave Atop Ion Aver Piano To Aver Pain Too Aver Patio On Aver Patio No Aver Atop Ion Eat Vain Poor Eat Via Porno Eat Vapor Ion Ate Vain Poor Ate Via Porno Ate Vapor Ion Eta Vain Poor Eta Via Porno Eta Vapor Ion Tea Vain Poor Tea Via Porno Tea Vapor Ion Ani Vapor Toe Ani Atop Over Ani Atop Rove Ani Oat Prove Ani Ova Trope Ovation Pa Re Piano Oar Vet Piano Oat Rev Piano At Over Piano At Rove Piano Vat Ore Piano Vat Roe Pain Oar Veto Pain Oar Vote Pain Oat Over Pain Oat Rove Pain Ova Rote Pain Ova Tore Paint Ova Ore Paint Ova Roe Inapt Ova Ore Inapt Ova Roe Rain Ova Poet Rani Ova Poet Train Ova Ope Anti Ova Rope Anti Ova Pore Vain Atop Ore Vain Atop Roe Vain Oar Poet Vain Taro Ope Vain Oat Rope Vain Oat Pore Patio An Over Patio An Rove Patio Nova Re Patio Van Ore Patio Van Roe Ratio Van Ope Ratio Ova Pen Ratio Pa Oven Iota An Prove Iota Nova Rep Iota Nova Per Iota Nap Over Iota Nap Rove Iota Pan Over Iota Pan Rove Iota Van Rope Iota Van Pore Iota Vapor En Iota Rap Oven Iota Par Oven Pair Nova Toe Pair Oat Oven Pair Ova Note Pair Ova Tone Tapir Ova Eon Tapir Ova One Pita Nova Ore Pita Nova Roe Pita Oar Oven Air Nova Poet Air Atop Oven Vita Roan Ope Vita Oar Open Vita Oar Peon Vita Oar Nope Vita Oar Pone Via Apron Toe Via Roan Poet Via Taro Open Via Taro Peon Via Taro Nope Via Taro Pone Via Oat Prone An Atop Vireo Apron Oat Vie Apron Ova Tie Roan Atop Vie Nova Atop Ire Nova Taro Pie Nova Oat Ripe Nova Oat Pier Nap Oat Vireo Pan Oat Vireo Atop Oar Nevi Atop Oar Vein Atop Oar Vine Atop Ova Rein Oar Ova Inept Oar Vat Opine Taro Ova Pine Oat Ova Ripen Ova Pa Tonier Ova Pa Orient Ova Rat Opine Ova Art Opine Ova Tar Opine A Naiver Op To A Vainer Op To A Ravine Op To A Native Op Or A Naive Op Tor A Naive Op Rot A Naive Pro To A Naive Pot Or A Naive Opt Or A Naive Top Or A Vitae On Pro A Vitae No Pro A Vitae Nor Op A Nae Pivot Or A Novae I Port A Novae Pi Tor A Novae Pi Rot A Novae Rip To A Novae Tip Or A Novae Pit Or A Novae It Pro A Novae Ti Pro A Raven Poi To A Raven Pi Too A Nave I Troop A Nave Poi Tor A Nave Poi Rot A Nave Tiro Op A Nave Riot Op A Nave Trio Op A Nave Pi Root A Nave Rip Too A Nave It Poor A Nave Ti Poor A Vane I Troop A Vane Poi Tor A Vane Poi Rot A Vane Tiro Op A Vane Riot Op A Vane Trio Op A Vane Pi Root A Vane Rip Too A Vane It Poor A Vane Ti Poor A Ovate I Porn A Ovate In Pro A Ovate Pin Or A Ovate Nip Or A Ovate Pi Nor A Ovate Rip On A Ovate Rip No A Ape Vino Tor A Ape Vino Rot A Pea Vino Tor A Pea Vino Rot A Pear Vino To A Reap Vino To A Rape Vino To A Pare Vino To A Peat Vino Or A Pate Vino Or A Tape Vino Or A Pave In Root A Pave Ion Tor A Pave Ion Rot A Pave Iron To A Pave Into Or A Pave Tiro On A Pave Tiro No A Pave Riot On A Pave Riot No A Pave Trio On A Pave Trio No A Ear Vino Pot A Ear Vino Opt A Ear Vino Top A Ear Pivot On A Ear Pivot No A Era Vino Pot A Era Vino Opt A Era Vino Top A Era Pivot On A Era Pivot No A Are Vino Pot A Are Vino Opt A Are Vino Top A Are Pivot On A Are Pivot No A Tear Vino Op A Rate Vino Op A Tare Vino Op A Avert Ion Op A Avert Poi On A Avert Poi No A Rave Ion Pot A Rave Ion Opt A Rave Ion Top A Rave Into Op A Rave Pin Too A Rave Nip Too A Rave Poi Ton A Rave Poi Not A Rave Pi Onto A Aver Ion Pot A Aver Ion Opt A Aver Ion Top A Aver Into Op A Aver Pin Too A Aver Nip Too A Aver Poi Ton A Aver Poi Not A Aver Pi Onto A Eat Vino Pro A Ate Vino Pro A Eta Vino Pro A Tea Vino Pro A Ani Prove To A Ani Voter Op A Ani Trove Op A Ani Overt Op A Ani Over Pot A Ani Over Opt A Ani Over Top A Ani Rove Pot A Ani Rove Opt A Ani Rove Top A Ani Veto Pro A Ani Vote Pro A Ani Vet Poor A Piano Rev To A Piano Vet Or A Pain Over To A Pain Rove To A Pain Veto Or A Pain Vote Or A Pain Rev Too A Rain Veto Op A Rain Vote Op A Rani Veto Op A Rani Vote Op A Anti Over Op A Anti Rove Op A Vain Ope Tor A Vain Ope Rot A Vain Rope To A Vain Pore To A Vain Poet Or A Vain Ore Pot A Vain Ore Opt A Vain Ore Top A Vain Roe Pot A Vain Roe Opt A Vain Roe Top A Vain Rote Op A Vain Tore Op A Vain Toe Pro A Vain Rep Too A Vain Per Too A Patio Rev On A Patio Rev No A Pair Oven To A Pair Veto On A Pair Veto No A Pair Vote On A Pair Vote No A Pita Oven Or A Pita Over On A Pita Over No A Pita Rove On A Pita Rove No A Air Oven Pot A Air Oven Opt A Air Oven Top A Vita En Poor A Vita Eon Pro A Vita One Pro A Vita Open Or A Vita Peon Or A Vita Nope Or A Vita Pone Or A Vita Ope Nor A Vita Rope On A Vita Rope No A Vita Pore On A Vita Pore No A Via En Troop A Via Eon Port A Via One Port A Via Open Tor A Via Open Rot A Via Peon Tor A Via Peon Rot A Via Nope Tor A Via Nope Rot A Via Pone Tor A Via Pone Rot A Via Prone To A Via Toner Op A Via Tenor Op A Via Note Pro A Via Tone Pro A Via Pen Root A Via Ten Poor A Via Net Poor A Via Ope Torn A Via Rope Ton A Via Rope Not A Via Pore Ton A Via Pore Not A Via Trope On A Via Trope No A Via Poet Nor A Via Toe Porn A Via Rep Onto A Via Per Onto A An Vireo Pot A An Vireo Opt A An Vireo Top A An Viper Too A An Vie Troop A An Ore Pivot A An Roe Pivot A An Voter Poi A An Trove Poi A An Overt Poi A Apron Vie To A Apron Veto I A Apron Vote I A Roan Vie Pot A Roan Vie Opt A Roan Vie Top A Roan Veto Pi A Roan Vote Pi A Roan Vet Poi A Nova Pie Tor A Nova Pie Rot A Nova Ripe To A Nova Pier To A Nova Ire Pot A Nova Ire Opt A Nova Ire Top A Nova Tire Op A Nova Tier Op A Nova Rite Op A Nova Tie Pro A Nova Rope It A Nova Rope Ti A Nova Pore It A Nova Pore Ti A Nova Trope I A Nova Ore Tip A Nova Ore Pit A Nova Roe Tip A Nova Roe Pit A Nova Rote Pi A Nova Tore Pi A Nova Toe Rip A Nap Vireo To A Nap Rive Too A Nap Vie Root A Pan Vireo To A Pan Rive Too A Pan Vie Root A Ran Veto Poi A Ran Vote Poi A Tan Vireo Op A Tan Vie Poor A Tan Over Poi A Tan Rove Poi A Ant Vireo Op A Ant Vie Poor A Ant Over Poi A Ant Rove Poi A Van Pie Root A Van Ripe Too A Van Pier Too A Van Tie Poor A Van Ope Tiro A Van Ope Riot A Van Ope Trio A Van Rote Poi A Van Tore Poi A Vapor Tie On A Vapor Tie No A Vapor Eon It A Vapor Eon Ti A Vapor One It A Vapor One Ti A Vapor Note I A Vapor Tone I A Vapor Toe In A Atop Nevi Or A Atop Vein Or A Atop Vine Or A Atop Rive On A Atop Rive No A Atop Vie Nor A Atop Over In A Atop Rove In A Atop Re Vino A Atop Rev Ion A Oar Nevi Pot A Oar Nevi Opt A Oar Nevi Top A Oar Vein Pot A Oar Vein Opt A Oar Vein Top A Oar Vine Pot A Oar Vine Opt A Oar Vine Top A Oar En Pivot A Oar Oven Tip A Oar Oven Pit A Oar Vent Poi A Oar Veto Pin A Oar Veto Nip A Oar Vote Pin A Oar Vote Nip A Oar Pet Vino A Taro Nevi Op A Taro Vein Op A Taro Vine Op A Taro Oven Pi A Oat Riven Op A Oat Nevi Pro A Oat Vein Pro A Oat Vine Pro A Oat Viper On A Oat Viper No A Oat Vie Porn A Oat Proven I A Oat Oven Rip A Oat Prove In A Oat Over Pin A Oat Over Nip A Oat Rove Pin A Oat Rove Nip A Oat Rep Vino A Oat Per Vino A Ova Pine Tor A Ova Pine Rot A Ova Ripen To A Ova Inept Or A Ova Rein Pot A Ova Rein Opt A Ova Rein Top A Ova Inert Op A Ova Inter Op A Ova Nitre Op A Ova Niter Op A Ova Nite Pro A Ova Tine Pro A Ova Pie Torn A Ova Ripe Ton A Ova Ripe Not A Ova Pier Ton A Ova Pier Not A Ova Tripe On A Ova Tripe No A Ova Tie Porn A Ova Eon Trip A Ova One Trip A Ova Prone It A Ova Prone Ti A Ova Toner Pi A Ova Tenor Pi A Ova Note Rip A Ova Tone Rip A Ova Pen Tiro A Ova Pen Riot A Ova Pen Trio A Ova Tern Poi A Ova Rent Poi A Ova Rope Tin A Ova Rope Nit A Ova Pore Tin A Ova Pore Nit A Ova Trope In A Ova Ore Pint A Ova Roe Pint A Ova Rote Pin A Ova Rote Nip A Ova Tore Pin A Ova Tore Nip A Ova Rep Into A Ova Per Into A Ova Pert Ion A Ova Pet Iron A Ova Re Pinto A Ova Re Piton A Ova Re Point A Pa Riven Too A Pa Nevi Root A Pa Vein Root A Pa Vine Root A Pa Vireo Ton A Pa Vireo Not A Pa Rive Onto A Pa Oven Tiro A Pa Oven Riot A Pa Oven Trio A Pa Rote Vino A Pa Tore Vino A Pa Voter Ion A Pa Trove Ion A Pa Overt Ion A Pa Over Into A Pa Rove Into A Pa Veto Iron A Pa Vote Iron A Rap Nevi Too A Rap Vein Too A Rap Vine Too A Rap Vie Onto A Rap Toe Vino A Rap Veto Ion A Rap Vote Ion A Par Nevi Too A Par Vein Too A Par Vine Too A Par Vie Onto A Par Toe Vino A Par Veto Ion A Par Vote Ion A Pat Vireo On A Pat Vireo No A Pat Ore Vino A Pat Roe Vino A Pat Over Ion A Pat Rove Ion A Tap Vireo On A Tap Vireo No A Tap Ore Vino A Tap Roe Vino A Tap Over Ion A Tap Rove Ion A Apt Vireo On A Apt Vireo No A Apt Ore Vino A Apt Roe Vino A Apt Over Ion A Apt Rove Ion A Rat Oven Poi A Rat Ope Vino A Art Oven Poi A Art Ope Vino A Tar Oven Poi A Tar Ope Vino A At Nevi Poor A At Vein Poor A At Vine Poor A At Vie Porno A At Rope Vino A At Pore Vino A At Prove Ion A Vat Opine Or A Vat Ope Iron A Vat Rope Ion A Vat Pore Ion Avian Re Op To Aria Vet On Op Aria Vet No Op Para Vie On To Para Vie No To Para Oven I To Para Veto I On Para Veto I No Para Vote I On Para Vote I No Naive Pa Or To Naive At Op Or Vitae An Op Or Vitae Pa On Or Vitae Pa No Or Nae Vita Op Or Nae Via Op Tor Nae Via Op Rot Nae Via Pro To Nae Via Pot Or Nae Via Opt Or Nae Via Top Or Nae Vapor I To Nae Ova I Port Nae Ova Pi Tor Nae Ova Pi Rot Nae Ova Rip To Nae Ova Tip Or Nae Ova Pit Or Nae Ova It Pro Nae Ova Ti Pro Nae Vat I Poor Nae Vat Poi Or Aeon Vat I Pro Aeon Vat Pi Or Novae Pa I Tor Novae Pa I Rot Novae Pa It Or Novae Pa Ti Or Novae Rap I To Novae Par I To Novae Pat I Or Novae Tap I Or Novae Apt I Or Novae Rat I Op Novae Art I Op Novae Tar I Op Novae At I Pro Novae At Pi Or Pane Via Or To Pane Ova I Tor Pane Ova I Rot Pane Ova It Or Pane Ova Ti Or Nape Via Or To Nape Ova I Tor Nape Ova I Rot Nape Ova It Or Nape Ova Ti Or Neap Via Or To Neap Ova I Tor Neap Ova I Rot Neap Ova It Or Neap Ova Ti Or Near Via Op To Near Ova I Pot Near Ova I Opt Near Ova I Top Near Ova Pi To Near Ova It Op Near Ova Ti Op Earn Via Op To Earn Ova I Pot Earn Ova I Opt Earn Ova I Top Earn Ova Pi To Earn Ova It Op Earn Ova Ti Op Raven Oat I Op Raven Pa I Too Ante Via Op Or Ante Ova I Pro Ante Ova Pi Or Neat Via Op Or Neat Ova I Pro Neat Ova Pi Or Nave Air Op To Nave Atop I Or Nave Oar I Pot Nave Oar I Opt Nave Oar I Top Nave Oar Pi To Nave Oar It Op Nave Oar Ti Op Nave Taro I Op Nave Oat I Pro Nave Oat Pi Or Nave Pa I Root Nave Rap I Too Nave Par I Too Nave At I Poor Nave At Poi Or Vane Air Op To Vane Atop I Or Vane Oar I Pot Vane Oar I Opt Vane Oar I Top Vane Oar Pi To Vane Oar It Op Vane Oar Ti Op Vane Taro I Op Vane Oat I Pro Vane Oat Pi Or Vane Pa I Root Vane Rap I Too Vane Par I Too Vane At I Poor Vane At Poi Or Opera Van I To Opera Vat I On Opera Vat I No Orate Van I Op Ovate An I Pro Ovate An Pi Or Ovate Nap I Or Ovate Pan I Or Ovate Ran I Op Ovate Pa I Nor Ovate Pa In Or Ovate Rap I On Ovate Rap I No Ovate Par I On Ovate Par I No Ape Vain Or To Ape Vita On Or Ape Vita No Or Ape Via On Tor Ape Via On Rot Ape Via No Tor Ape Via No Rot Ape Via Nor To Ape Via Ton Or Ape Via Not Or Ape Nova I Tor Ape Nova I Rot Ape Nova It Or Ape Nova Ti Or Ape Van I Root Ape Ova I Torn Ape Ova In Tor Ape Ova In Rot Ape Ova Tin Or Ape Ova Nit Or Ape Ova It Nor Ape Ova Ti Nor Ape At Vino Or Ape Vat Ion Or Pea Vain Or To Pea Vita On Or Pea Vita No Or Pea Via On Tor Pea Via On Rot Pea Via No Tor Pea Via No Rot Pea Via Nor To Pea Via Ton Or Pea Via Not Or Pea Nova I Tor Pea Nova I Rot Pea Nova It Or Pea Nova Ti Or Pea Van I Root Pea Ova I Torn Pea Ova In Tor Pea Ova In Rot
How are two atoms held together in a covalent bond?
Chemical bond From Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaA chemical bond is a lasting attraction between atoms that enables the formation of chemical compounds. The bond may result from the electrostatic force of attraction between atoms with opposite charges, or through the sharing of electrons as in the covalent bonds. The strength of chemical bonds varies considerably; there are "strong bonds" or "primary bond" such as metallic, covalent or ionic bonds and "weak bonds" or "secondary bond" such as Dipole-dipole interaction, the London dispersion forceand hydrogen bonding.Since opposite charges attract via a simple electromagnetic force, the negatively charged electrons that are orbiting the nucleus and the positively charged protons in the nucleus attract each other. An electron positioned between two nuclei will be attracted to both of them, and the nuclei will be attracted toward electrons in this position. This attraction constitutes the chemical bond. Due to the matter wave nature of electrons and their smaller mass, they must occupy a much larger amount of volume compared with the nuclei, and this volume occupied by the electrons keeps the atomic nuclei relatively far apart, as compared with the size of the nuclei themselves. This phenomenon limits the distance between nuclei and atoms in a bond.In general, strong chemical bonding is associated with the sharing or transfer of electrons between the participating atoms. The atoms in molecules, crystals, metals and diatomic gases-indeed most of the physical environment around us-are held together by chemical bonds, which dictate the structure and the bulk properties of matter.Examples of Lewis dot-style representations of chemical bonds between carbon (C), hydrogen (H), and oxygen (O). Lewis dot diagrams were an early attempt to describe chemical bonding and are still widely used today.All bonds can be explained by quantum theory, but, in practice, simplification rules allow chemists to predict the strength, directionality, and polarity of bonds. The octet rule and VSEPR theory are two examples. More sophisticated theories are valence bond theorywhich includes orbital hybridization and resonance, and molecular orbital theorywhich includes linear combination of atomic orbitals and ligand field theory. Electrostatics are used to describe bond polarities and the effects they have on chemical substances.Contents[show] Overview of main types of chemical bondsThis section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this sectionby adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (January 2014) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)A chemical bond is an attraction between atoms. This attraction may be seen as the result of different behaviors of the outermost or valence electrons of atoms. These behaviors merge into each other seamlessly in various circumstances, so that there is no clear line to be drawn between them. However it remains useful and customary to differentiate between different types of bond, which result in different properties of condensed matter.In the simplest view of a covalent bond, one or more electrons (often a pair of electrons) are drawn into the space between the two atomic nuclei. Energy is released by bond formation. This is not as a reduction in potential energy, because the attraction of the two electrons to the two protons[clarification needed] is offset by the electron-electron and proton-proton repulsions. Instead, the release of energy (and hence stability of the bond) arises from the reduction in kinetic energy due to the electrons being in a more spatially distributed (i.e. longer de Broglie wavelength) orbital compared with each electron being confined closer to its respective nucleus.[1] These bonds exist between two particular identifiable atoms and have a direction in space, allowing them to be shown as single connecting lines between atoms in drawings, or modeled as sticks between spheres in models.In a polar covalent bond, one or more electrons are unequally shared between two nuclei. Covalent bonds often result in the formation of small collections of better-connected atoms called molecules, which in solids and liquids are bound to other molecules by forces that are often much weaker than the covalent bonds that hold the molecules internally together. Such weak intermolecular bonds give organic molecular substances, such as waxes and oils, their soft bulk character, and their low melting points (in liquids, molecules must cease most structured or oriented contact with each other). When covalent bonds link long chains of atoms in large molecules, however (as in polymers such as nylon), or when covalent bonds extend in networks through solids that are not composed of discrete molecules (such as diamond or quartz or the silicate minerals in many types of rock) then the structures that result may be both strong and tough, at least in the direction oriented correctly with networks of covalent bonds. Also, the melting points of such covalent polymers and networks increase greatly.In a simplified view of an ionic bond, the bonding electron is not shared at all, but transferred. In this type of bond, the outer atomic orbital of one atom has a vacancy which allows the addition of one or more electrons. These newly added electrons potentially occupy a lower energy-state (effectively closer to more nuclear charge) than they experience in a different atom. Thus, one nucleus offers a more tightly bound position to an electron than does another nucleus, with the result that one atom may transfer an electron to the other. This transfer causes one atom to assume a net positive charge, and the other to assume a net negative charge. The bond then results from electrostatic attraction between atoms and the atoms become positive or negatively charged ions. Ionic bonds may be seen as extreme examples of polarization in covalent bonds. Often, such bonds have no particular orientation in space, since they result from equal electrostatic attraction of each ion to all ions around them. Ionic bonds are strong (and thus ionic substances require high temperatures to melt) but also brittle, since the forces between ions are short-range and do not easily bridge cracks and fractures. This type of bond gives rise to the physical characteristics of crystals of classic mineral salts, such as table salt.A less often mentioned type of bonding is metallic bonding. In this type of bonding, each atom in a metal donates one or more electrons to a "sea" of electrons that reside between many metal atoms. In this sea, each electron is free (by virtue of its wave nature) to be associated with a great many atoms at once. The bond results because the metal atoms become somewhat positively charged due to loss of their electrons while the electrons remain attracted to many atoms, without being part of any given atom. Metallic bonding may be seen as an extreme example of delocalization of electrons over a large system of covalent bonds, in which every atom participates. This type of bonding is often very strong (resulting in the tensile strengthof metals). However, metallic bonding is more collective in nature than other types, and so they allow metal crystals to more easily deform, because they are composed of atoms attracted to each other, but not in any particularly-oriented ways. This results in the malleability of metals. The sea of electrons in metallic bonding causes the characteristically good electrical and thermal conductivity of metals, and also their "shiny" reflection of most frequencies of white light.HistoryThis section needs additional citations to secondary or tertiary sources such as review articles, monographs, or textbooks. Please add references to provide context and establish notability for any primary research articles cited. (March 2015) Main articles: History of chemistry and History of the moleculeEarly speculations about the nature of the chemical bond, from as early as the 12th century, supposed that certain types of chemical species were joined by a type of chemical affinity. In 1704, Sir Isaac Newtonfamously outlined his atomic bonding theory, in "Query 31" of his Opticks, whereby atoms attach to each other by some "force". Specifically, after acknowledging the various popular theories in vogue at the time, of how atoms were reasoned to attach to each other, i.e. "hooked atoms", "glued together by rest", or "stuck together by conspiring motions", Newton states that he would rather infer from their cohesion, that "particles attract one another by some force, which in immediate contact is exceedingly strong, at small distances performs the chemical operations, and reaches not far from the particles with any sensible effect."In 1819, on the heels of the invention of the voltaic pile, Jöns Jakob Berzeliusdeveloped a theory of chemical combination stressing the electronegative and electropositive characters of the combining atoms. By the mid 19th century, Edward Frankland, F.A. Kekulé, A.S. Couper, Alexander Butlerov, and Hermann Kolbe, building on the theory of radicals, developed the theory of valency, originally called "combining power", in which compounds were joined owing to an attraction of positive and negative poles. In 1916, chemist Gilbert N. Lewisdeveloped the concept of the electron-pair bond, in which two atoms may share one to six electrons, thus forming the single electron bond, a single bond, a double bond, or a triple bond; in Lewis's own words, "An electron may form a part of the shell of two different atoms and cannot be said to belong to either one exclusively."[2]That same year, Walther Kossel put forward a theory similar to Lewis' only his model assumed complete transfers of electrons between atoms, and was thus a model of ionic bonding. Both Lewis and Kossel structured their bonding models on that of Abegg's rule (1904).In 1927, the first mathematically complete quantum description of a simple chemical bond, i.e. that produced by one electron in the hydrogen molecular ion, H2+, was derived by the Danish physicist Oyvind Burrau.[3] This work showed that the quantum approach to chemical bonds could be fundamentally and quantitatively correct, but the mathematical methods used could not be extended to molecules containing more than one electron. A more practical, albeit less quantitative, approach was put forward in the same year by Walter Heitler and Fritz London. The Heitler-London method forms the basis of what is now called valence bond theory. In 1929, the linear combination of atomic orbitals molecular orbital method (LCAO) approximation was introduced by Sir John Lennard-Jones, who also suggested methods to derive electronic structures of molecules of F2(fluorine) and O2 (oxygen) molecules, from basic quantum principles. This molecular orbital theory represented a covalent bond as an orbital formed by combining the quantum mechanical Schrödinger atomic orbitals which had been hypothesized for electrons in single atoms. The equations for bonding electrons in multi-electron atoms could not be solved to mathematical perfection (i.e., analytically), but approximations for them still gave many good qualitative predictions and results. Most quantitative calculations in modern quantum chemistry use either valence bond or molecular orbital theory as a starting point, although a third approach, density functional theory, has become increasingly popular in recent years.In 1933, H. H. James and A. S. Coolidge carried out a calculation on the dihydrogen molecule that, unlike all previous calculation which used functions only of the distance of the electron from the atomic nucleus, used functions which also explicitly added the distance between the two electrons.[4]With up to 13 adjustable parameters they obtained a result very close to the experimental result for the dissociation energy. Later extensions have used up to 54 parameters and gave excellent agreement with experiments. This calculation convinced the scientific community that quantum theory could give agreement with experiment. However this approach has none of the physical pictures of the valence bond and molecular orbital theories and is difficult to extend to larger molecules.Bonds in chemical formulasThis section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this sectionby adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (March 2015) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)Because atoms and molecules are three-dimensional, it is difficult to use a single method to indicate orbitals and bonds. In molecular formulasthe chemical bonds (binding orbitals) between atoms are indicated in different ways depending on the type of discussion. Sometimes, some details are neglected. For example, in organic chemistry one is sometimes concerned only with the functional groupof the molecule. Thus, the molecular formula of ethanol may be written in conformational form, three-dimensional form, full two-dimensional form (indicating every bond with no three-dimensional directions), compressed two-dimensional form (CH3-CH2-OH), by separating the functional group from another part of the molecule (C2H5OH), or by its atomic constituents (C2H6O), according to what is discussed. Sometimes, even the non-bonding valence shell electrons (with the two-dimensional approximate directions) are marked, e.g. for elemental carbon .'C'. Some chemists may also mark the respective orbitals, e.g. the hypothetical ethene−4 anion (\/C=C/\−4) indicating the possibility of bond formation.Strong chemical bondsThis section needs additional citations to secondary or tertiary sources such as review articles, monographs, or textbooks. Please add references to provide context and establish notability for any primary research articles cited. (March 2015) Typical bond lengths in pmand bond energies in kJ/mol.Bond lengths can be converted to Åby division by 100 (1 Å = 100 pm).Data taken from University of Waterloo.[5] Bond Length(pm) Energy(kJ/mol) H - Hydrogen H-H 74 436 H-O 96 366 H-F 92 568 H-Cl 127 432 C - Carbon C-H 109 413 C-C 154 348 C-C= 151 =C-C≡ 147 =C-C= 148 C=C 134 614 C≡C 120 839 C-N 147 308 C-O 143 360 C-F 134 488 C-Cl 177 330 N - Nitrogen N-H 101 391 N-N 145 170 N≡N 110 945 O - Oxygen O-O 148 145 O=O 121 498 F, Cl, Br, I - Halogens F-F 142 158 Cl-Cl 199 243 Br-H 141 366 Br-Br 228 193 I-H 161 298 I-I 267 151Strong chemical bonds are the intramolecular forces which hold atoms together in molecules. A strong chemical bond is formed from the transfer or sharing of electrons between atomic centers and relies on the electrostatic attractionbetween the protons in nuclei and the electrons in the orbitals.The types of strong bond differ due to the difference in electronegativityof the constituent elements. A large difference in electronegativity leads to more polar (ionic) character in the bond.Ionic bondingMain article: Ionic bondingIonic bonding is a type of electrostatic interaction between atoms which have a large electronegativity difference. There is no precise value that distinguishes ionic from covalent bonding, but a difference of electronegativity of over 1.7 is likely to be ionic, and a difference of less than 1.7 is likely to be covalent.[6] Ionic bonding leads to separate positive and negative ions. Ionic charges are commonly between −3e to +3e. Ionic bonding commonly occurs in metal salts such as sodium chloride (table salt). A typical feature of ionic bonds is that the species form into ionic crystals, in which no ion is specifically paired with any single other ion, in a specific directional bond. Rather, each species of ion is surrounded by ions of the opposite charge, and the spacing between it and each of the oppositely charged ions near it, is the same for all surrounding atoms of the same type. It is thus no longer possible to associate an ion with any specific other single ionized atom near it. This is a situation unlike that in covalent crystals, where covalent bonds between specific atoms are still discernible from the shorter distances between them, as measured via such techniques as X-ray diffraction.Ionic crystals may contain a mixture of covalent and ionic species, as for example salts of complex acids, such as sodium cyanide, NaCN. X-ray diffraction shows that in NaCN, for example, the bonds between sodium cations (Na+) and the cyanide anions (CN−) are ionic, with no sodium ion associated with any particular cyanide. However, the bonds between C and N atoms in cyanide are of the covalent type, making each of the carbon and nitrogen associated with just one of its opposite type, to which it is physically much closer than it is to other carbons or nitrogens in a sodium cyanide crystal.When such crystals are melted into liquids, the ionic bonds are broken first because they are non-directional and allow the charged species to move freely. Similarly, when such salts dissolve into water, the ionic bonds are typically broken by the interaction with water, but the covalent bonds continue to hold. For example, in solution, the cyanide ions, still bound together as single CN− ions, move independently through the solution, as do sodium ions, as Na+. In water, charged ions move apart because each of them are more strongly attracted to a number of water molecules, than to each other. The attraction between ions and water molecules in such solutions is due to a type of weak dipole-dipole type chemical bond. In melted ionic compounds, the ions continue to be attracted to each other, but not in any ordered or crystalline way.Covalent bondMain article: Covalent bondNonpolar covalent bonds in methane (CH4). The Lewis structure shows electrons shared between C and H atoms.Covalent bonding is a common type of bonding, in which two atoms share two valence electrons, one from each of the atoms. In nonpolar covalent bonds, the electronegativity difference between the bonded atoms is small, typically 0 to 0.3. Bonds within most organic compoundsare described as covalent. The figure shows methane (CH4), in which each hydrogen forms a covalent bond with the carbon. See sigma bonds and pi bonds for LCAO-description of such bonding.Molecules which are formed primarily from non-polar covalent bonds are often immiscible in water or other polar solvents, but much more soluble in non-polar solventssuch as hexane.A polar covalent bond is a covalent bond with a significant ionic character. This means that the two shared electrons are closer to one of the atoms than the other, creating an imbalance of charge. Such bonds occur between two atoms with moderately different electronegativities and give rise to dipole-dipole interactions. The electronegativity difference between the two atoms in these bonds is 0.3 to 1.7.Single and multiple bondsA single bond between two atoms corresponds to the sharing of one pair of electrons. The electron density of these two bonding electrons is concentrated in the region between the two atoms, which is the defining quality of a sigma bond.Two p-orbitals forming a pi-bond.A double bond between two atoms is formed by the sharing of two pairs of electrons, one in a sigma bond and one in a pi bond, with electron density concentrated on two opposite sides of the internuclear axis. A triple bond consists of three shared electron pairs, forming one sigma and two pi bonds.Quadruple and higher bonds are very rare and occur only between certain transition metalatoms.Coordinate covalent bond (Dipolar bond)Adduct of ammonia and boron trifluorideA coordinate covalent bondis a covalent bond in which the two shared bonding electrons are from the same one of the atoms involved in the bond. For example, boron trifluoride (BF3) and ammonia (NH3) from an adduct or coordination complexF3B←NH3 with a B-N bond in which a lone pair of electrons on N is shared with an empty atomic orbital on B. BF3 with an empty orbital is described as an electron pair acceptor or Lewis acid, while NH3 with a lone pair which can be shared is described as an electron-pair donor or Lewis base. The electrons are shared roughly equally between the atoms in contrast to ionic bonding. Such bonding is shown by an arrow pointing to the Lewis acid.Transition metal complexes are generally bound by coordinate covalent bonds. For example, the ion Ag+ reacts as a Lewis acid with two molecules of the Lewis base NH3 to form the complex ion Ag(NH3)2+, which has two Ag←N coordinate covalent bonds.Metallic bondingMain article: Metallic bondingIn metallic bonding, bonding electrons are delocalized over a lattice of atoms. By contrast, in ionic compounds, the locations of the binding electrons and their charges are static. The freely-moving or delocalization of bonding electrons leads to classical metallic properties such as luster (surface light reflectivity), electrical and thermal conductivity, ductility, and high tensile strength.Intermolecular bondingThis section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this sectionby adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (January 2014) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Main article: Intermolecular forceThere are four basic types of bonds that can be formed between two or more (otherwise non-associated) molecules, ions or atoms. Intermolecular forcescause molecules to be attracted or repulsed by each other. Often, these define some of the physical characteristics (such as the melting point) of a substance.A large difference in electronegativitybetween two bonded atoms will cause a permanent charge separation, or dipole, in a molecule or ion. Two or more molecules or ions with permanent dipoles can interact within dipole-dipole interactions. The bonding electrons in a molecule or ion will, on average, be closer to the more electronegative atom more frequently than the less electronegative one, giving rise to partial charges on each atom, and causing electrostatic forcesbetween molecules or ions.A hydrogen bond is effectively a strong example of an interaction between two permanent dipoles. The large difference in electronegativities between hydrogen and any of fluorine, nitrogen and oxygen, coupled with their lone pairs of electrons cause strong electrostatic forces between molecules. Hydrogen bonds are responsible for the high boiling points of water and ammoniawith respect to their heavier analogues.The London dispersion forcearises due to instantaneous dipoles in neighbouring atoms. As the negative charge of the electron is not uniform around the whole atom, there is always a charge imbalance. This small charge will induce a corresponding dipole in a nearby molecule; causing an attraction between the two. The electron then moves to another part of the electron cloud and the attraction is broken.A cation-pi interaction occurs between a pi bond and a cation.Theories of chemical bondingThis section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this sectionby adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (January 2014) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Main article: Chemical bonding modelIn the (unrealistic) limit of "pure" ionic bonding, electrons are perfectly localized on one of the two atoms in the bond. Such bonds can be understood by classical physics. The forces between the atoms are characterized by isotropic continuum electrostatic potentials. Their magnitude is in simple proportion to the charge difference.Covalent bonds are better understood by valence bond theory or molecular orbital theory. The properties of the atoms involved can be understood using concepts such as oxidation number. The electron density within a bond is not assigned to individual atoms, but is instead delocalized between atoms. In valence bond theory, the two electrons on the two atoms are coupled together with the bond strength depending on the overlap between them. In molecular orbital theory, the linear combination of atomic orbitals (LCAO) helps describe the delocalized molecular orbital structures and energies based on the atomic orbitals of the atoms they came from. Unlike pure ionic bonds, covalent bonds may have directed anisotropic properties. These may have their own names, such as sigma bond and pi bond.In the general case, atoms form bonds that are intermediate between ionic and covalent, depending on the relative electronegativity of the atoms involved. This type of bond is sometimes called polar covalent.ReferencesJump up^ Rioux, F. (2001). "The Covalent Bond in H2". The Chemical Educator. 6 (5): 288. doi:10.1007/s00897010509a.Jump up^ Lewis, Gilbert N.(1916). "The Atom and the Molecule". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 38 (4): 772. doi:10.1021/ja02261a002. a copyJump up^ Laidler, K. J. (1993). The World of Physical Chemistry. Oxford University Press. p. 346. ISBN 0-19-855919-4.Jump up^ James, H. H.; Coolidge, A. S. (1933). "The Ground State of the Hydrogen Molecule". Journal of Chemical Physics. American Institute of Physics. 1 (12): 825-835. doi:10.1063/1.1749252.Jump up^ "Bond Lengths and Energies". Science.uwaterloo.ca. Retrieved 2013-10-15.Jump up^ Atkins, Peter; Loretta Jones (1997). Chemistry: Molecules, Matter and Change. New York: W. H. Freeman & Co. pp. 294-295. ISBN 0-7167-3107-X.External linksWikiquote has quotations related to: Chemical bondW. Locke (1997). Introduction to Molecular Orbital Theory. Retrieved May 18, 2005.Carl R. Nave (2005). HyperPhysics. Retrieved May 18, 2005.Linus Pauling and the Nature of the Chemical Bond: A Documentary History. Retrieved February 29, 2008.[hide] vteChemical bondsIntramolecular(strong)CovalentBy symmetrySigma (σ)Pi (π)Delta (δ)Phi (φ)By multiplicity1 (single)2 (double)3 (triple)4 (quadruple)5 (quintuple)6 (sextuple)MiscellaneousAgosticBentCoordinate (dipolar)Pi backbondCharge-shiftHapticityConjugationHyperconjugationAntibondingResonantElectron deficiency3c-2e4c-2eHypercoordination3c-4eAromaticitymöbiussupersigmahomospiroσ-bishomosphericalY-MetallicMetal aromaticityIonicIntermolecular(weak)van der Waals forcesLondon dispersionHydrogenLow-barrierResonance-assistedSymmetricDihydrogen bondsC-H···O interactionNoncovalentotherMechanicalHalogenAurophilicityIntercalationStackingCation-piAnion-piSalt bridgeAuthority controlGND: 4009843-6NDL: 00564418Categories:Chemical bondingQuantum chemistry
Is Carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) are in the same group.?
Chemical bond From Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaA chemical bond is a lasting attraction between atoms that enables the formation of chemical compounds. The bond may result from the electrostatic force of attraction between atoms with opposite charges, or through the sharing of electrons as in the covalent bonds. The strength of chemical bonds varies considerably; there are "strong bonds" or "primary bond" such as metallic, covalent or ionic bonds and "weak bonds" or "secondary bond" such as Dipole-dipole interaction, the London dispersion forceand hydrogen bonding.Since opposite charges attract via a simple electromagnetic force, the negatively charged electrons that are orbiting the nucleus and the positively charged protons in the nucleus attract each other. An electron positioned between two nuclei will be attracted to both of them, and the nuclei will be attracted toward electrons in this position. This attraction constitutes the chemical bond. Due to the matter wave nature of electrons and their smaller mass, they must occupy a much larger amount of volume compared with the nuclei, and this volume occupied by the electrons keeps the atomic nuclei relatively far apart, as compared with the size of the nuclei themselves. This phenomenon limits the distance between nuclei and atoms in a bond.In general, strong chemical bonding is associated with the sharing or transfer of electrons between the participating atoms. The atoms in molecules, crystals, metals and diatomic gases-indeed most of the physical environment around us-are held together by chemical bonds, which dictate the structure and the bulk properties of matter.Examples of Lewis dot-style representations of chemical bonds between carbon (C), hydrogen (H), and oxygen (O). Lewis dot diagrams were an early attempt to describe chemical bonding and are still widely used today.All bonds can be explained by quantum theory, but, in practice, simplification rules allow chemists to predict the strength, directionality, and polarity of bonds. The octet rule and VSEPR theory are two examples. More sophisticated theories are valence bond theorywhich includes orbital hybridization and resonance, and molecular orbital theorywhich includes linear combination of atomic orbitals and ligand field theory. Electrostatics are used to describe bond polarities and the effects they have on chemical substances.Contents[show] Overview of main types of chemical bondsThis section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this sectionby adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (January 2014) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)A chemical bond is an attraction between atoms. This attraction may be seen as the result of different behaviors of the outermost or valence electrons of atoms. These behaviors merge into each other seamlessly in various circumstances, so that there is no clear line to be drawn between them. However it remains useful and customary to differentiate between different types of bond, which result in different properties of condensed matter.In the simplest view of a covalent bond, one or more electrons (often a pair of electrons) are drawn into the space between the two atomic nuclei. Energy is released by bond formation. This is not as a reduction in potential energy, because the attraction of the two electrons to the two protons[clarification needed] is offset by the electron-electron and proton-proton repulsions. Instead, the release of energy (and hence stability of the bond) arises from the reduction in kinetic energy due to the electrons being in a more spatially distributed (i.e. longer de Broglie wavelength) orbital compared with each electron being confined closer to its respective nucleus.[1] These bonds exist between two particular identifiable atoms and have a direction in space, allowing them to be shown as single connecting lines between atoms in drawings, or modeled as sticks between spheres in models.In a polar covalent bond, one or more electrons are unequally shared between two nuclei. Covalent bonds often result in the formation of small collections of better-connected atoms called molecules, which in solids and liquids are bound to other molecules by forces that are often much weaker than the covalent bonds that hold the molecules internally together. Such weak intermolecular bonds give organic molecular substances, such as waxes and oils, their soft bulk character, and their low melting points (in liquids, molecules must cease most structured or oriented contact with each other). When covalent bonds link long chains of atoms in large molecules, however (as in polymers such as nylon), or when covalent bonds extend in networks through solids that are not composed of discrete molecules (such as diamond or quartz or the silicate minerals in many types of rock) then the structures that result may be both strong and tough, at least in the direction oriented correctly with networks of covalent bonds. Also, the melting points of such covalent polymers and networks increase greatly.In a simplified view of an ionic bond, the bonding electron is not shared at all, but transferred. In this type of bond, the outer atomic orbital of one atom has a vacancy which allows the addition of one or more electrons. These newly added electrons potentially occupy a lower energy-state (effectively closer to more nuclear charge) than they experience in a different atom. Thus, one nucleus offers a more tightly bound position to an electron than does another nucleus, with the result that one atom may transfer an electron to the other. This transfer causes one atom to assume a net positive charge, and the other to assume a net negative charge. The bond then results from electrostatic attraction between atoms and the atoms become positive or negatively charged ions. Ionic bonds may be seen as extreme examples of polarization in covalent bonds. Often, such bonds have no particular orientation in space, since they result from equal electrostatic attraction of each ion to all ions around them. Ionic bonds are strong (and thus ionic substances require high temperatures to melt) but also brittle, since the forces between ions are short-range and do not easily bridge cracks and fractures. This type of bond gives rise to the physical characteristics of crystals of classic mineral salts, such as table salt.A less often mentioned type of bonding is metallic bonding. In this type of bonding, each atom in a metal donates one or more electrons to a "sea" of electrons that reside between many metal atoms. In this sea, each electron is free (by virtue of its wave nature) to be associated with a great many atoms at once. The bond results because the metal atoms become somewhat positively charged due to loss of their electrons while the electrons remain attracted to many atoms, without being part of any given atom. Metallic bonding may be seen as an extreme example of delocalization of electrons over a large system of covalent bonds, in which every atom participates. This type of bonding is often very strong (resulting in the tensile strengthof metals). However, metallic bonding is more collective in nature than other types, and so they allow metal crystals to more easily deform, because they are composed of atoms attracted to each other, but not in any particularly-oriented ways. This results in the malleability of metals. The sea of electrons in metallic bonding causes the characteristically good electrical and thermal conductivity of metals, and also their "shiny" reflection of most frequencies of white light.HistoryThis section needs additional citations to secondary or tertiary sources such as review articles, monographs, or textbooks. Please add references to provide context and establish notability for any primary research articles cited. (March 2015) Main articles: History of chemistry and History of the moleculeEarly speculations about the nature of the chemical bond, from as early as the 12th century, supposed that certain types of chemical species were joined by a type of chemical affinity. In 1704, Sir Isaac Newtonfamously outlined his atomic bonding theory, in "Query 31" of his Opticks, whereby atoms attach to each other by some "force". Specifically, after acknowledging the various popular theories in vogue at the time, of how atoms were reasoned to attach to each other, i.e. "hooked atoms", "glued together by rest", or "stuck together by conspiring motions", Newton states that he would rather infer from their cohesion, that "particles attract one another by some force, which in immediate contact is exceedingly strong, at small distances performs the chemical operations, and reaches not far from the particles with any sensible effect."In 1819, on the heels of the invention of the voltaic pile, Jöns Jakob Berzeliusdeveloped a theory of chemical combination stressing the electronegative and electropositive characters of the combining atoms. By the mid 19th century, Edward Frankland, F.A. Kekulé, A.S. Couper, Alexander Butlerov, and Hermann Kolbe, building on the theory of radicals, developed the theory of valency, originally called "combining power", in which compounds were joined owing to an attraction of positive and negative poles. In 1916, chemist Gilbert N. Lewisdeveloped the concept of the electron-pair bond, in which two atoms may share one to six electrons, thus forming the single electron bond, a single bond, a double bond, or a triple bond; in Lewis's own words, "An electron may form a part of the shell of two different atoms and cannot be said to belong to either one exclusively."[2]That same year, Walther Kossel put forward a theory similar to Lewis' only his model assumed complete transfers of electrons between atoms, and was thus a model of ionic bonding. Both Lewis and Kossel structured their bonding models on that of Abegg's rule (1904).In 1927, the first mathematically complete quantum description of a simple chemical bond, i.e. that produced by one electron in the hydrogen molecular ion, H2+, was derived by the Danish physicist Oyvind Burrau.[3] This work showed that the quantum approach to chemical bonds could be fundamentally and quantitatively correct, but the mathematical methods used could not be extended to molecules containing more than one electron. A more practical, albeit less quantitative, approach was put forward in the same year by Walter Heitler and Fritz London. The Heitler-London method forms the basis of what is now called valence bond theory. In 1929, the linear combination of atomic orbitals molecular orbital method (LCAO) approximation was introduced by Sir John Lennard-Jones, who also suggested methods to derive electronic structures of molecules of F2(fluorine) and O2 (oxygen) molecules, from basic quantum principles. This molecular orbital theory represented a covalent bond as an orbital formed by combining the quantum mechanical Schrödinger atomic orbitals which had been hypothesized for electrons in single atoms. The equations for bonding electrons in multi-electron atoms could not be solved to mathematical perfection (i.e., analytically), but approximations for them still gave many good qualitative predictions and results. Most quantitative calculations in modern quantum chemistry use either valence bond or molecular orbital theory as a starting point, although a third approach, density functional theory, has become increasingly popular in recent years.In 1933, H. H. James and A. S. Coolidge carried out a calculation on the dihydrogen molecule that, unlike all previous calculation which used functions only of the distance of the electron from the atomic nucleus, used functions which also explicitly added the distance between the two electrons.[4]With up to 13 adjustable parameters they obtained a result very close to the experimental result for the dissociation energy. Later extensions have used up to 54 parameters and gave excellent agreement with experiments. This calculation convinced the scientific community that quantum theory could give agreement with experiment. However this approach has none of the physical pictures of the valence bond and molecular orbital theories and is difficult to extend to larger molecules.Bonds in chemical formulasThis section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this sectionby adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (March 2015) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)Because atoms and molecules are three-dimensional, it is difficult to use a single method to indicate orbitals and bonds. In molecular formulasthe chemical bonds (binding orbitals) between atoms are indicated in different ways depending on the type of discussion. Sometimes, some details are neglected. For example, in organic chemistry one is sometimes concerned only with the functional groupof the molecule. Thus, the molecular formula of ethanol may be written in conformational form, three-dimensional form, full two-dimensional form (indicating every bond with no three-dimensional directions), compressed two-dimensional form (CH3-CH2-OH), by separating the functional group from another part of the molecule (C2H5OH), or by its atomic constituents (C2H6O), according to what is discussed. Sometimes, even the non-bonding valence shell electrons (with the two-dimensional approximate directions) are marked, e.g. for elemental carbon .'C'. Some chemists may also mark the respective orbitals, e.g. the hypothetical ethene−4 anion (\/C=C/\−4) indicating the possibility of bond formation.Strong chemical bondsThis section needs additional citations to secondary or tertiary sources such as review articles, monographs, or textbooks. Please add references to provide context and establish notability for any primary research articles cited. (March 2015) Typical bond lengths in pmand bond energies in kJ/mol.Bond lengths can be converted to Åby division by 100 (1 Å = 100 pm).Data taken from University of Waterloo.[5] Bond Length(pm) Energy(kJ/mol) H - Hydrogen H-H 74 436 H-O 96 366 H-F 92 568 H-Cl 127 432 C - Carbon C-H 109 413 C-C 154 348 C-C= 151 =C-C≡ 147 =C-C= 148 C=C 134 614 C≡C 120 839 C-N 147 308 C-O 143 360 C-F 134 488 C-Cl 177 330 N - Nitrogen N-H 101 391 N-N 145 170 N≡N 110 945 O - Oxygen O-O 148 145 O=O 121 498 F, Cl, Br, I - Halogens F-F 142 158 Cl-Cl 199 243 Br-H 141 366 Br-Br 228 193 I-H 161 298 I-I 267 151Strong chemical bonds are the intramolecular forces which hold atoms together in molecules. A strong chemical bond is formed from the transfer or sharing of electrons between atomic centers and relies on the electrostatic attractionbetween the protons in nuclei and the electrons in the orbitals.The types of strong bond differ due to the difference in electronegativityof the constituent elements. A large difference in electronegativity leads to more polar (ionic) character in the bond.Ionic bondingMain article: Ionic bondingIonic bonding is a type of electrostatic interaction between atoms which have a large electronegativity difference. There is no precise value that distinguishes ionic from covalent bonding, but a difference of electronegativity of over 1.7 is likely to be ionic, and a difference of less than 1.7 is likely to be covalent.[6] Ionic bonding leads to separate positive and negative ions. Ionic charges are commonly between −3e to +3e. Ionic bonding commonly occurs in metal salts such as sodium chloride (table salt). A typical feature of ionic bonds is that the species form into ionic crystals, in which no ion is specifically paired with any single other ion, in a specific directional bond. Rather, each species of ion is surrounded by ions of the opposite charge, and the spacing between it and each of the oppositely charged ions near it, is the same for all surrounding atoms of the same type. It is thus no longer possible to associate an ion with any specific other single ionized atom near it. This is a situation unlike that in covalent crystals, where covalent bonds between specific atoms are still discernible from the shorter distances between them, as measured via such techniques as X-ray diffraction.Ionic crystals may contain a mixture of covalent and ionic species, as for example salts of complex acids, such as sodium cyanide, NaCN. X-ray diffraction shows that in NaCN, for example, the bonds between sodium cations (Na+) and the cyanide anions (CN−) are ionic, with no sodium ion associated with any particular cyanide. However, the bonds between C and N atoms in cyanide are of the covalent type, making each of the carbon and nitrogen associated with just one of its opposite type, to which it is physically much closer than it is to other carbons or nitrogens in a sodium cyanide crystal.When such crystals are melted into liquids, the ionic bonds are broken first because they are non-directional and allow the charged species to move freely. Similarly, when such salts dissolve into water, the ionic bonds are typically broken by the interaction with water, but the covalent bonds continue to hold. For example, in solution, the cyanide ions, still bound together as single CN− ions, move independently through the solution, as do sodium ions, as Na+. In water, charged ions move apart because each of them are more strongly attracted to a number of water molecules, than to each other. The attraction between ions and water molecules in such solutions is due to a type of weak dipole-dipole type chemical bond. In melted ionic compounds, the ions continue to be attracted to each other, but not in any ordered or crystalline way.Covalent bondMain article: Covalent bondNonpolar covalent bonds in methane (CH4). The Lewis structure shows electrons shared between C and H atoms.Covalent bonding is a common type of bonding, in which two atoms share two valence electrons, one from each of the atoms. In nonpolar covalent bonds, the electronegativity difference between the bonded atoms is small, typically 0 to 0.3. Bonds within most organic compoundsare described as covalent. The figure shows methane (CH4), in which each hydrogen forms a covalent bond with the carbon. See sigma bonds and pi bonds for LCAO-description of such bonding.Molecules which are formed primarily from non-polar covalent bonds are often immiscible in water or other polar solvents, but much more soluble in non-polar solventssuch as hexane.A polar covalent bond is a covalent bond with a significant ionic character. This means that the two shared electrons are closer to one of the atoms than the other, creating an imbalance of charge. Such bonds occur between two atoms with moderately different electronegativities and give rise to dipole-dipole interactions. The electronegativity difference between the two atoms in these bonds is 0.3 to 1.7.Single and multiple bondsA single bond between two atoms corresponds to the sharing of one pair of electrons. The electron density of these two bonding electrons is concentrated in the region between the two atoms, which is the defining quality of a sigma bond.Two p-orbitals forming a pi-bond.A double bond between two atoms is formed by the sharing of two pairs of electrons, one in a sigma bond and one in a pi bond, with electron density concentrated on two opposite sides of the internuclear axis. A triple bond consists of three shared electron pairs, forming one sigma and two pi bonds.Quadruple and higher bonds are very rare and occur only between certain transition metalatoms.Coordinate covalent bond (Dipolar bond)Adduct of ammonia and boron trifluorideA coordinate covalent bondis a covalent bond in which the two shared bonding electrons are from the same one of the atoms involved in the bond. For example, boron trifluoride (BF3) and ammonia (NH3) from an adduct or coordination complexF3B←NH3 with a B-N bond in which a lone pair of electrons on N is shared with an empty atomic orbital on B. BF3 with an empty orbital is described as an electron pair acceptor or Lewis acid, while NH3 with a lone pair which can be shared is described as an electron-pair donor or Lewis base. The electrons are shared roughly equally between the atoms in contrast to ionic bonding. Such bonding is shown by an arrow pointing to the Lewis acid.Transition metal complexes are generally bound by coordinate covalent bonds. For example, the ion Ag+ reacts as a Lewis acid with two molecules of the Lewis base NH3 to form the complex ion Ag(NH3)2+, which has two Ag←N coordinate covalent bonds.Metallic bondingMain article: Metallic bondingIn metallic bonding, bonding electrons are delocalized over a lattice of atoms. By contrast, in ionic compounds, the locations of the binding electrons and their charges are static. The freely-moving or delocalization of bonding electrons leads to classical metallic properties such as luster (surface light reflectivity), electrical and thermal conductivity, ductility, and high tensile strength.Intermolecular bondingThis section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this sectionby adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (January 2014) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Main article: Intermolecular forceThere are four basic types of bonds that can be formed between two or more (otherwise non-associated) molecules, ions or atoms. Intermolecular forcescause molecules to be attracted or repulsed by each other. Often, these define some of the physical characteristics (such as the melting point) of a substance.A large difference in electronegativitybetween two bonded atoms will cause a permanent charge separation, or dipole, in a molecule or ion. Two or more molecules or ions with permanent dipoles can interact within dipole-dipole interactions. The bonding electrons in a molecule or ion will, on average, be closer to the more electronegative atom more frequently than the less electronegative one, giving rise to partial charges on each atom, and causing electrostatic forcesbetween molecules or ions.A hydrogen bond is effectively a strong example of an interaction between two permanent dipoles. The large difference in electronegativities between hydrogen and any of fluorine, nitrogen and oxygen, coupled with their lone pairs of electrons cause strong electrostatic forces between molecules. Hydrogen bonds are responsible for the high boiling points of water and ammoniawith respect to their heavier analogues.The London dispersion forcearises due to instantaneous dipoles in neighbouring atoms. As the negative charge of the electron is not uniform around the whole atom, there is always a charge imbalance. This small charge will induce a corresponding dipole in a nearby molecule; causing an attraction between the two. The electron then moves to another part of the electron cloud and the attraction is broken.A cation-pi interaction occurs between a pi bond and a cation.Theories of chemical bondingThis section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this sectionby adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (January 2014) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Main article: Chemical bonding modelIn the (unrealistic) limit of "pure" ionic bonding, electrons are perfectly localized on one of the two atoms in the bond. Such bonds can be understood by classical physics. The forces between the atoms are characterized by isotropic continuum electrostatic potentials. Their magnitude is in simple proportion to the charge difference.Covalent bonds are better understood by valence bond theory or molecular orbital theory. The properties of the atoms involved can be understood using concepts such as oxidation number. The electron density within a bond is not assigned to individual atoms, but is instead delocalized between atoms. In valence bond theory, the two electrons on the two atoms are coupled together with the bond strength depending on the overlap between them. In molecular orbital theory, the linear combination of atomic orbitals (LCAO) helps describe the delocalized molecular orbital structures and energies based on the atomic orbitals of the atoms they came from. Unlike pure ionic bonds, covalent bonds may have directed anisotropic properties. These may have their own names, such as sigma bond and pi bond.In the general case, atoms form bonds that are intermediate between ionic and covalent, depending on the relative electronegativity of the atoms involved. This type of bond is sometimes called polar covalent.ReferencesJump up^ Rioux, F. (2001). "The Covalent Bond in H2". The Chemical Educator. 6 (5): 288. doi:10.1007/s00897010509a.Jump up^ Lewis, Gilbert N.(1916). "The Atom and the Molecule". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 38 (4): 772. doi:10.1021/ja02261a002. a copyJump up^ Laidler, K. J. (1993). The World of Physical Chemistry. Oxford University Press. p. 346. ISBN 0-19-855919-4.Jump up^ James, H. H.; Coolidge, A. S. (1933). "The Ground State of the Hydrogen Molecule". Journal of Chemical Physics. American Institute of Physics. 1 (12): 825-835. doi:10.1063/1.1749252.Jump up^ "Bond Lengths and Energies". Science.uwaterloo.ca. Retrieved 2013-10-15.Jump up^ Atkins, Peter; Loretta Jones (1997). Chemistry: Molecules, Matter and Change. New York: W. H. Freeman & Co. pp. 294-295. ISBN 0-7167-3107-X.External linksWikiquote has quotations related to: Chemical bondW. Locke (1997). Introduction to Molecular Orbital Theory. Retrieved May 18, 2005.Carl R. Nave (2005). HyperPhysics. Retrieved May 18, 2005.Linus Pauling and the Nature of the Chemical Bond: A Documentary History. Retrieved February 29, 2008.[hide] vteChemical bondsIntramolecular(strong)CovalentBy symmetrySigma (σ)Pi (π)Delta (δ)Phi (φ)By multiplicity1 (single)2 (double)3 (triple)4 (quadruple)5 (quintuple)6 (sextuple)MiscellaneousAgosticBentCoordinate (dipolar)Pi backbondCharge-shiftHapticityConjugationHyperconjugationAntibondingResonantElectron deficiency3c-2e4c-2eHypercoordination3c-4eAromaticitymöbiussupersigmahomospiroσ-bishomosphericalY-MetallicMetal aromaticityIonicIntermolecular(weak)van der Waals forcesLondon dispersionHydrogenLow-barrierResonance-assistedSymmetricDihydrogen bondsC-H···O interactionNoncovalentotherMechanicalHalogenAurophilicityIntercalationStackingCation-piAnion-piSalt bridgeAuthority controlGND: 4009843-6NDL: 00564418Categories:Chemical bondingQuantum chemistry
A(n) is formed when two or more elements are joined together.?
Chemical bond From Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaA chemical bond is a lasting attraction between atoms that enables the formation of chemical compounds. The bond may result from the electrostatic force of attraction between atoms with opposite charges, or through the sharing of electrons as in the covalent bonds. The strength of chemical bonds varies considerably; there are "strong bonds" or "primary bond" such as metallic, covalent or ionic bonds and "weak bonds" or "secondary bond" such as Dipole-dipole interaction, the London dispersion forceand hydrogen bonding.Since opposite charges attract via a simple electromagnetic force, the negatively charged electrons that are orbiting the nucleus and the positively charged protons in the nucleus attract each other. An electron positioned between two nuclei will be attracted to both of them, and the nuclei will be attracted toward electrons in this position. This attraction constitutes the chemical bond. Due to the matter wave nature of electrons and their smaller mass, they must occupy a much larger amount of volume compared with the nuclei, and this volume occupied by the electrons keeps the atomic nuclei relatively far apart, as compared with the size of the nuclei themselves. This phenomenon limits the distance between nuclei and atoms in a bond.In general, strong chemical bonding is associated with the sharing or transfer of electrons between the participating atoms. The atoms in molecules, crystals, metals and diatomic gases-indeed most of the physical environment around us-are held together by chemical bonds, which dictate the structure and the bulk properties of matter.Examples of Lewis dot-style representations of chemical bonds between carbon (C), hydrogen (H), and oxygen (O). Lewis dot diagrams were an early attempt to describe chemical bonding and are still widely used today.All bonds can be explained by quantum theory, but, in practice, simplification rules allow chemists to predict the strength, directionality, and polarity of bonds. The octet rule and VSEPR theory are two examples. More sophisticated theories are valence bond theorywhich includes orbital hybridization and resonance, and molecular orbital theorywhich includes linear combination of atomic orbitals and ligand field theory. Electrostatics are used to describe bond polarities and the effects they have on chemical substances.Contents[show] Overview of main types of chemical bondsThis section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this sectionby adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (January 2014) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)A chemical bond is an attraction between atoms. This attraction may be seen as the result of different behaviors of the outermost or valence electrons of atoms. These behaviors merge into each other seamlessly in various circumstances, so that there is no clear line to be drawn between them. However it remains useful and customary to differentiate between different types of bond, which result in different properties of condensed matter.In the simplest view of a covalent bond, one or more electrons (often a pair of electrons) are drawn into the space between the two atomic nuclei. Energy is released by bond formation. This is not as a reduction in potential energy, because the attraction of the two electrons to the two protons[clarification needed] is offset by the electron-electron and proton-proton repulsions. Instead, the release of energy (and hence stability of the bond) arises from the reduction in kinetic energy due to the electrons being in a more spatially distributed (i.e. longer de Broglie wavelength) orbital compared with each electron being confined closer to its respective nucleus.[1] These bonds exist between two particular identifiable atoms and have a direction in space, allowing them to be shown as single connecting lines between atoms in drawings, or modeled as sticks between spheres in models.In a polar covalent bond, one or more electrons are unequally shared between two nuclei. Covalent bonds often result in the formation of small collections of better-connected atoms called molecules, which in solids and liquids are bound to other molecules by forces that are often much weaker than the covalent bonds that hold the molecules internally together. Such weak intermolecular bonds give organic molecular substances, such as waxes and oils, their soft bulk character, and their low melting points (in liquids, molecules must cease most structured or oriented contact with each other). When covalent bonds link long chains of atoms in large molecules, however (as in polymers such as nylon), or when covalent bonds extend in networks through solids that are not composed of discrete molecules (such as diamond or quartz or the silicate minerals in many types of rock) then the structures that result may be both strong and tough, at least in the direction oriented correctly with networks of covalent bonds. Also, the melting points of such covalent polymers and networks increase greatly.In a simplified view of an ionic bond, the bonding electron is not shared at all, but transferred. In this type of bond, the outer atomic orbital of one atom has a vacancy which allows the addition of one or more electrons. These newly added electrons potentially occupy a lower energy-state (effectively closer to more nuclear charge) than they experience in a different atom. Thus, one nucleus offers a more tightly bound position to an electron than does another nucleus, with the result that one atom may transfer an electron to the other. This transfer causes one atom to assume a net positive charge, and the other to assume a net negative charge. The bond then results from electrostatic attraction between atoms and the atoms become positive or negatively charged ions. Ionic bonds may be seen as extreme examples of polarization in covalent bonds. Often, such bonds have no particular orientation in space, since they result from equal electrostatic attraction of each ion to all ions around them. Ionic bonds are strong (and thus ionic substances require high temperatures to melt) but also brittle, since the forces between ions are short-range and do not easily bridge cracks and fractures. This type of bond gives rise to the physical characteristics of crystals of classic mineral salts, such as table salt.A less often mentioned type of bonding is metallic bonding. In this type of bonding, each atom in a metal donates one or more electrons to a "sea" of electrons that reside between many metal atoms. In this sea, each electron is free (by virtue of its wave nature) to be associated with a great many atoms at once. The bond results because the metal atoms become somewhat positively charged due to loss of their electrons while the electrons remain attracted to many atoms, without being part of any given atom. Metallic bonding may be seen as an extreme example of delocalization of electrons over a large system of covalent bonds, in which every atom participates. This type of bonding is often very strong (resulting in the tensile strengthof metals). However, metallic bonding is more collective in nature than other types, and so they allow metal crystals to more easily deform, because they are composed of atoms attracted to each other, but not in any particularly-oriented ways. This results in the malleability of metals. The sea of electrons in metallic bonding causes the characteristically good electrical and thermal conductivity of metals, and also their "shiny" reflection of most frequencies of white light.HistoryThis section needs additional citations to secondary or tertiary sources such as review articles, monographs, or textbooks. Please add references to provide context and establish notability for any primary research articles cited. (March 2015) Main articles: History of chemistry and History of the moleculeEarly speculations about the nature of the chemical bond, from as early as the 12th century, supposed that certain types of chemical species were joined by a type of chemical affinity. In 1704, Sir Isaac Newtonfamously outlined his atomic bonding theory, in "Query 31" of his Opticks, whereby atoms attach to each other by some "force". Specifically, after acknowledging the various popular theories in vogue at the time, of how atoms were reasoned to attach to each other, i.e. "hooked atoms", "glued together by rest", or "stuck together by conspiring motions", Newton states that he would rather infer from their cohesion, that "particles attract one another by some force, which in immediate contact is exceedingly strong, at small distances performs the chemical operations, and reaches not far from the particles with any sensible effect."In 1819, on the heels of the invention of the voltaic pile, Jöns Jakob Berzeliusdeveloped a theory of chemical combination stressing the electronegative and electropositive characters of the combining atoms. By the mid 19th century, Edward Frankland, F.A. Kekulé, A.S. Couper, Alexander Butlerov, and Hermann Kolbe, building on the theory of radicals, developed the theory of valency, originally called "combining power", in which compounds were joined owing to an attraction of positive and negative poles. In 1916, chemist Gilbert N. Lewisdeveloped the concept of the electron-pair bond, in which two atoms may share one to six electrons, thus forming the single electron bond, a single bond, a double bond, or a triple bond; in Lewis's own words, "An electron may form a part of the shell of two different atoms and cannot be said to belong to either one exclusively."[2]That same year, Walther Kossel put forward a theory similar to Lewis' only his model assumed complete transfers of electrons between atoms, and was thus a model of ionic bonding. Both Lewis and Kossel structured their bonding models on that of Abegg's rule (1904).In 1927, the first mathematically complete quantum description of a simple chemical bond, i.e. that produced by one electron in the hydrogen molecular ion, H2+, was derived by the Danish physicist Oyvind Burrau.[3] This work showed that the quantum approach to chemical bonds could be fundamentally and quantitatively correct, but the mathematical methods used could not be extended to molecules containing more than one electron. A more practical, albeit less quantitative, approach was put forward in the same year by Walter Heitler and Fritz London. The Heitler-London method forms the basis of what is now called valence bond theory. In 1929, the linear combination of atomic orbitals molecular orbital method (LCAO) approximation was introduced by Sir John Lennard-Jones, who also suggested methods to derive electronic structures of molecules of F2(fluorine) and O2 (oxygen) molecules, from basic quantum principles. This molecular orbital theory represented a covalent bond as an orbital formed by combining the quantum mechanical Schrödinger atomic orbitals which had been hypothesized for electrons in single atoms. The equations for bonding electrons in multi-electron atoms could not be solved to mathematical perfection (i.e., analytically), but approximations for them still gave many good qualitative predictions and results. Most quantitative calculations in modern quantum chemistry use either valence bond or molecular orbital theory as a starting point, although a third approach, density functional theory, has become increasingly popular in recent years.In 1933, H. H. James and A. S. Coolidge carried out a calculation on the dihydrogen molecule that, unlike all previous calculation which used functions only of the distance of the electron from the atomic nucleus, used functions which also explicitly added the distance between the two electrons.[4]With up to 13 adjustable parameters they obtained a result very close to the experimental result for the dissociation energy. Later extensions have used up to 54 parameters and gave excellent agreement with experiments. This calculation convinced the scientific community that quantum theory could give agreement with experiment. However this approach has none of the physical pictures of the valence bond and molecular orbital theories and is difficult to extend to larger molecules.Bonds in chemical formulasThis section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this sectionby adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (March 2015) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)Because atoms and molecules are three-dimensional, it is difficult to use a single method to indicate orbitals and bonds. In molecular formulasthe chemical bonds (binding orbitals) between atoms are indicated in different ways depending on the type of discussion. Sometimes, some details are neglected. For example, in organic chemistry one is sometimes concerned only with the functional groupof the molecule. Thus, the molecular formula of ethanol may be written in conformational form, three-dimensional form, full two-dimensional form (indicating every bond with no three-dimensional directions), compressed two-dimensional form (CH3-CH2-OH), by separating the functional group from another part of the molecule (C2H5OH), or by its atomic constituents (C2H6O), according to what is discussed. Sometimes, even the non-bonding valence shell electrons (with the two-dimensional approximate directions) are marked, e.g. for elemental carbon .'C'. Some chemists may also mark the respective orbitals, e.g. the hypothetical ethene−4 anion (\/C=C/\−4) indicating the possibility of bond formation.Strong chemical bondsThis section needs additional citations to secondary or tertiary sources such as review articles, monographs, or textbooks. Please add references to provide context and establish notability for any primary research articles cited. (March 2015) Typical bond lengths in pmand bond energies in kJ/mol.Bond lengths can be converted to Åby division by 100 (1 Å = 100 pm).Data taken from University of Waterloo.[5] Bond Length(pm) Energy(kJ/mol) H - Hydrogen H-H 74 436 H-O 96 366 H-F 92 568 H-Cl 127 432 C - Carbon C-H 109 413 C-C 154 348 C-C= 151 =C-C≡ 147 =C-C= 148 C=C 134 614 C≡C 120 839 C-N 147 308 C-O 143 360 C-F 134 488 C-Cl 177 330 N - Nitrogen N-H 101 391 N-N 145 170 N≡N 110 945 O - Oxygen O-O 148 145 O=O 121 498 F, Cl, Br, I - Halogens F-F 142 158 Cl-Cl 199 243 Br-H 141 366 Br-Br 228 193 I-H 161 298 I-I 267 151Strong chemical bonds are the intramolecular forces which hold atoms together in molecules. A strong chemical bond is formed from the transfer or sharing of electrons between atomic centers and relies on the electrostatic attractionbetween the protons in nuclei and the electrons in the orbitals.The types of strong bond differ due to the difference in electronegativityof the constituent elements. A large difference in electronegativity leads to more polar (ionic) character in the bond.Ionic bondingMain article: Ionic bondingIonic bonding is a type of electrostatic interaction between atoms which have a large electronegativity difference. There is no precise value that distinguishes ionic from covalent bonding, but a difference of electronegativity of over 1.7 is likely to be ionic, and a difference of less than 1.7 is likely to be covalent.[6] Ionic bonding leads to separate positive and negative ions. Ionic charges are commonly between −3e to +3e. Ionic bonding commonly occurs in metal salts such as sodium chloride (table salt). A typical feature of ionic bonds is that the species form into ionic crystals, in which no ion is specifically paired with any single other ion, in a specific directional bond. Rather, each species of ion is surrounded by ions of the opposite charge, and the spacing between it and each of the oppositely charged ions near it, is the same for all surrounding atoms of the same type. It is thus no longer possible to associate an ion with any specific other single ionized atom near it. This is a situation unlike that in covalent crystals, where covalent bonds between specific atoms are still discernible from the shorter distances between them, as measured via such techniques as X-ray diffraction.Ionic crystals may contain a mixture of covalent and ionic species, as for example salts of complex acids, such as sodium cyanide, NaCN. X-ray diffraction shows that in NaCN, for example, the bonds between sodium cations (Na+) and the cyanide anions (CN−) are ionic, with no sodium ion associated with any particular cyanide. However, the bonds between C and N atoms in cyanide are of the covalent type, making each of the carbon and nitrogen associated with just one of its opposite type, to which it is physically much closer than it is to other carbons or nitrogens in a sodium cyanide crystal.When such crystals are melted into liquids, the ionic bonds are broken first because they are non-directional and allow the charged species to move freely. Similarly, when such salts dissolve into water, the ionic bonds are typically broken by the interaction with water, but the covalent bonds continue to hold. For example, in solution, the cyanide ions, still bound together as single CN− ions, move independently through the solution, as do sodium ions, as Na+. In water, charged ions move apart because each of them are more strongly attracted to a number of water molecules, than to each other. The attraction between ions and water molecules in such solutions is due to a type of weak dipole-dipole type chemical bond. In melted ionic compounds, the ions continue to be attracted to each other, but not in any ordered or crystalline way.Covalent bondMain article: Covalent bondNonpolar covalent bonds in methane (CH4). The Lewis structure shows electrons shared between C and H atoms.Covalent bonding is a common type of bonding, in which two atoms share two valence electrons, one from each of the atoms. In nonpolar covalent bonds, the electronegativity difference between the bonded atoms is small, typically 0 to 0.3. Bonds within most organic compoundsare described as covalent. The figure shows methane (CH4), in which each hydrogen forms a covalent bond with the carbon. See sigma bonds and pi bonds for LCAO-description of such bonding.Molecules which are formed primarily from non-polar covalent bonds are often immiscible in water or other polar solvents, but much more soluble in non-polar solventssuch as hexane.A polar covalent bond is a covalent bond with a significant ionic character. This means that the two shared electrons are closer to one of the atoms than the other, creating an imbalance of charge. Such bonds occur between two atoms with moderately different electronegativities and give rise to dipole-dipole interactions. The electronegativity difference between the two atoms in these bonds is 0.3 to 1.7.Single and multiple bondsA single bond between two atoms corresponds to the sharing of one pair of electrons. The electron density of these two bonding electrons is concentrated in the region between the two atoms, which is the defining quality of a sigma bond.Two p-orbitals forming a pi-bond.A double bond between two atoms is formed by the sharing of two pairs of electrons, one in a sigma bond and one in a pi bond, with electron density concentrated on two opposite sides of the internuclear axis. A triple bond consists of three shared electron pairs, forming one sigma and two pi bonds.Quadruple and higher bonds are very rare and occur only between certain transition metalatoms.Coordinate covalent bond (Dipolar bond)Adduct of ammonia and boron trifluorideA coordinate covalent bondis a covalent bond in which the two shared bonding electrons are from the same one of the atoms involved in the bond. For example, boron trifluoride (BF3) and ammonia (NH3) from an adduct or coordination complexF3B←NH3 with a B-N bond in which a lone pair of electrons on N is shared with an empty atomic orbital on B. BF3 with an empty orbital is described as an electron pair acceptor or Lewis acid, while NH3 with a lone pair which can be shared is described as an electron-pair donor or Lewis base. The electrons are shared roughly equally between the atoms in contrast to ionic bonding. Such bonding is shown by an arrow pointing to the Lewis acid.Transition metal complexes are generally bound by coordinate covalent bonds. For example, the ion Ag+ reacts as a Lewis acid with two molecules of the Lewis base NH3 to form the complex ion Ag(NH3)2+, which has two Ag←N coordinate covalent bonds.Metallic bondingMain article: Metallic bondingIn metallic bonding, bonding electrons are delocalized over a lattice of atoms. By contrast, in ionic compounds, the locations of the binding electrons and their charges are static. The freely-moving or delocalization of bonding electrons leads to classical metallic properties such as luster (surface light reflectivity), electrical and thermal conductivity, ductility, and high tensile strength.Intermolecular bondingThis section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this sectionby adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (January 2014) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Main article: Intermolecular forceThere are four basic types of bonds that can be formed between two or more (otherwise non-associated) molecules, ions or atoms. Intermolecular forcescause molecules to be attracted or repulsed by each other. Often, these define some of the physical characteristics (such as the melting point) of a substance.A large difference in electronegativitybetween two bonded atoms will cause a permanent charge separation, or dipole, in a molecule or ion. Two or more molecules or ions with permanent dipoles can interact within dipole-dipole interactions. The bonding electrons in a molecule or ion will, on average, be closer to the more electronegative atom more frequently than the less electronegative one, giving rise to partial charges on each atom, and causing electrostatic forcesbetween molecules or ions.A hydrogen bond is effectively a strong example of an interaction between two permanent dipoles. The large difference in electronegativities between hydrogen and any of fluorine, nitrogen and oxygen, coupled with their lone pairs of electrons cause strong electrostatic forces between molecules. Hydrogen bonds are responsible for the high boiling points of water and ammoniawith respect to their heavier analogues.The London dispersion forcearises due to instantaneous dipoles in neighbouring atoms. As the negative charge of the electron is not uniform around the whole atom, there is always a charge imbalance. This small charge will induce a corresponding dipole in a nearby molecule; causing an attraction between the two. The electron then moves to another part of the electron cloud and the attraction is broken.A cation-pi interaction occurs between a pi bond and a cation.Theories of chemical bondingThis section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this sectionby adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (January 2014) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Main article: Chemical bonding modelIn the (unrealistic) limit of "pure" ionic bonding, electrons are perfectly localized on one of the two atoms in the bond. Such bonds can be understood by classical physics. The forces between the atoms are characterized by isotropic continuum electrostatic potentials. Their magnitude is in simple proportion to the charge difference.Covalent bonds are better understood by valence bond theory or molecular orbital theory. The properties of the atoms involved can be understood using concepts such as oxidation number. The electron density within a bond is not assigned to individual atoms, but is instead delocalized between atoms. In valence bond theory, the two electrons on the two atoms are coupled together with the bond strength depending on the overlap between them. In molecular orbital theory, the linear combination of atomic orbitals (LCAO) helps describe the delocalized molecular orbital structures and energies based on the atomic orbitals of the atoms they came from. Unlike pure ionic bonds, covalent bonds may have directed anisotropic properties. These may have their own names, such as sigma bond and pi bond.In the general case, atoms form bonds that are intermediate between ionic and covalent, depending on the relative electronegativity of the atoms involved. This type of bond is sometimes called polar covalent.ReferencesJump up^ Rioux, F. (2001). "The Covalent Bond in H2". The Chemical Educator. 6 (5): 288. doi:10.1007/s00897010509a.Jump up^ Lewis, Gilbert N.(1916). "The Atom and the Molecule". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 38 (4): 772. doi:10.1021/ja02261a002. a copyJump up^ Laidler, K. J. (1993). The World of Physical Chemistry. Oxford University Press. p. 346. ISBN 0-19-855919-4.Jump up^ James, H. H.; Coolidge, A. S. (1933). "The Ground State of the Hydrogen Molecule". Journal of Chemical Physics. American Institute of Physics. 1 (12): 825-835. doi:10.1063/1.1749252.Jump up^ "Bond Lengths and Energies". Science.uwaterloo.ca. Retrieved 2013-10-15.Jump up^ Atkins, Peter; Loretta Jones (1997). Chemistry: Molecules, Matter and Change. New York: W. H. Freeman & Co. pp. 294-295. ISBN 0-7167-3107-X.External linksWikiquote has quotations related to: Chemical bondW. Locke (1997). Introduction to Molecular Orbital Theory. Retrieved May 18, 2005.Carl R. Nave (2005). HyperPhysics. Retrieved May 18, 2005.Linus Pauling and the Nature of the Chemical Bond: A Documentary History. Retrieved February 29, 2008.[hide] vteChemical bondsIntramolecular(strong)CovalentBy symmetrySigma (σ)Pi (π)Delta (δ)Phi (φ)By multiplicity1 (single)2 (double)3 (triple)4 (quadruple)5 (quintuple)6 (sextuple)MiscellaneousAgosticBentCoordinate (dipolar)Pi backbondCharge-shiftHapticityConjugationHyperconjugationAntibondingResonantElectron deficiency3c-2e4c-2eHypercoordination3c-4eAromaticitymöbiussupersigmahomospiroσ-bishomosphericalY-MetallicMetal aromaticityIonicIntermolecular(weak)van der Waals forcesLondon dispersionHydrogenLow-barrierResonance-assistedSymmetricDihydrogen bondsC-H···O interactionNoncovalentotherMechanicalHalogenAurophilicityIntercalationStackingCation-piAnion-piSalt bridgeAuthority controlGND: 4009843-6NDL: 00564418Categories:Chemical bondingQuantum chemistry
How tall is Steve Nave?
Steve Nave is 6' 0".
When was La nave created?
La nave was created in 1918.
When did Royston Nave die?
Royston Nave died in 1931.
When was Royston Nave born?
Royston Nave was born in 1886.
When did Eric Nave die?
Eric Nave died in 1993.
When was Eric Nave born?
Eric Nave was born in 1899.
What does nave mean as an adjective?
Nave is not an adjective. It is a noun for the middle part of a church.
When was Orville Nave born?
Orville Nave was born on 1841-04-30.
When did Orville Nave die?
Orville Nave died on 1917-06-24.
When was Howie Nave born?
Howie Nave was born on 1956-04-04.
What has the author Harald Nave written?
Harald Nave has written: 'Alaska-Feuerland'
What is the population of Nave San Rocco?
The population of Nave San Rocco is 1,279.
