zinc sulfate and copper. it is a displacement reaction, the more reactive metal reacts with the compound of the less reacive metal
Copper primarily bonds with elements such as oxygen, sulfur, and chlorine to form compounds. Depending on the oxidation state of the copper ion, it can bond with various other elements like carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus to form a wide range of compounds.
No, copper and chlorine are not likely to form a metallic bond. Metallic bonds typically occur between atoms of the same metal, while copper and chlorine are different elements. Instead, copper and chlorine are more likely to form an ionic bond where copper will donate electrons to chlorine forming a compound such as copper (II) chloride.
In copper sulfate, the bond type between copper and sulfur is an ionic bond. Copper has a positive charge while sulfate (SO4) has a negative charge, leading to the attraction between the two ions to form the compound.
No, copper and oxygen would not form a covalent bond. Instead, they would likely form an ionic bond, where copper would donate electrons to oxygen to create a copper oxide compound.
An alloy bond is formed between copper and zinc when they are combined to form brass. This bond involves the mixing of the atoms of copper and zinc at the atomic level, creating a homogenous material with unique properties.
Copper primarily bonds with elements such as oxygen, sulfur, and chlorine to form compounds. Depending on the oxidation state of the copper ion, it can bond with various other elements like carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus to form a wide range of compounds.
No, copper and chlorine are not likely to form a metallic bond. Metallic bonds typically occur between atoms of the same metal, while copper and chlorine are different elements. Instead, copper and chlorine are more likely to form an ionic bond where copper will donate electrons to chlorine forming a compound such as copper (II) chloride.
In copper sulfate, the bond type between copper and sulfur is an ionic bond. Copper has a positive charge while sulfate (SO4) has a negative charge, leading to the attraction between the two ions to form the compound.
This is an ionic bond between metals and nonmetals.
No, copper and oxygen would not form a covalent bond. Instead, they would likely form an ionic bond, where copper would donate electrons to oxygen to create a copper oxide compound.
An alloy bond is formed between copper and zinc when they are combined to form brass. This bond involves the mixing of the atoms of copper and zinc at the atomic level, creating a homogenous material with unique properties.
Copper Chloride is an ionic bond. So, no. It isn't a covalent bond. :)
No, solid copper wiring does not involve an ionic bond. Copper atoms in the wire form metallic bonds where electrons are delocalized and move freely between the atoms, creating a "sea of electrons" that holds the metal together.
No, copper chloride typically forms an ionic compound due to the large electronegativity difference between copper and chloride atoms. Copper loses electrons to form positively charged ions, while chloride gains electrons to form negatively charged ions, resulting in an ionic bond between them.
A nonpolar covalent bond will form between carbon (C) and hydrogen (H) due to the similar electronegativities of these elements. In this type of bond, the electrons are shared equally between the atoms.
Covalent bonds are between nonmetals.
No, copper and fluorine do not typically form an ionic bond. Copper is a transition metal which tends to form covalent bonds, while fluorine is a highly electronegative element that also forms covalent bonds. In this case, copper and fluorine would likely form a covalent bond rather than an ionic bond.