Compounds with covalent bonds are generally more dangerous more open flames, because they are more likely to combust. Ionic compounds such as salt usually do not react as nearly much to flame. This results due to the different natures of the bonds.
Silicon and nitrogen typically do not form an ionic compound as both elements are nonmetals and tend to share electrons to form covalent bonds. In this case, they are more likely to form covalent compounds rather than an ionic compound.
No, bromine and carbon would not form an ionic compound. Carbon typically forms covalent bonds and bromine can also form both covalent and ionic bonds, depending on the element it is reacting with. In this case, a covalent bond would be more likely between bromine and carbon.
The chemical compound P2O2 does not exist. IF it could it would almost certainly be covalently bonded.
Yes that is all it contains there for it to be ionic or metallic the bond would have to have a metal for ionic and more than 2 elements for metallic composed of metals
No, Mn and Cl would likely not form a covalent compound. Manganese (Mn) typically forms ionic compounds, while chlorine (Cl) is a highly electronegative element that typically forms ionic compounds as well. Therefore, they would most likely form an ionic compound rather than a covalent one.
Chlorine oxide would be a covalent compound, and not an ionic compound.
An ionic compound is composed of metal and a nonmetal. Therefore NBr3 is a covalent compound, because it is made up of two nonmetals.
Silicon and nitrogen typically do not form an ionic compound as both elements are nonmetals and tend to share electrons to form covalent bonds. In this case, they are more likely to form covalent compounds rather than an ionic compound.
No, bromine and carbon would not form an ionic compound. Carbon typically forms covalent bonds and bromine can also form both covalent and ionic bonds, depending on the element it is reacting with. In this case, a covalent bond would be more likely between bromine and carbon.
The chemical compound P2O2 does not exist. IF it could it would almost certainly be covalently bonded.
Yes that is all it contains there for it to be ionic or metallic the bond would have to have a metal for ionic and more than 2 elements for metallic composed of metals
No, Mn and Cl would likely not form a covalent compound. Manganese (Mn) typically forms ionic compounds, while chlorine (Cl) is a highly electronegative element that typically forms ionic compounds as well. Therefore, they would most likely form an ionic compound rather than a covalent one.
An ionic compound dissociated in water is an electrolyte and is of course more conductive..
No, magnesium and sulfur would not form an ionic compound because they are both nonmetals. Ionic compounds are formed between a metal and a nonmetal. Magnesium and sulfur would likely form a covalent compound instead.
P2H4 is a covalent compound. It is made up of nonmetals (phosphorus and hydrogen) which typically form covalent bonds by sharing electrons.
The formual is suspect- such a compound would be covalent.
N2S4 is covalent as it is composed of non-metal elements (nitrogen and sulfur) which typically form covalent bonds by sharing electrons. The compound does not contain any metal ions which would indicate ionic bonding.